Search results

Didnt we built STOBAR ground facility for certification. Why you unable to see beyond horizon? Also, Rafale - M certified to operate from steam catapults, there is nothing like in world certification for carrier.

How you got the numbers 30 fixed wings & 10 helos? You got any proof or firing blank shots in air? They can, but they need certification. And for certification one need ground facility equipped with EMALS or steam catapult on ground.

Wow, just wow on your sheer stupidity. 100% force never deployed during peace time, the figure hover from 60-70%. When Command get orders from MoD that be ready for activating OP Plan, then Navy start to think about deploying 100% force. The Navy buy the Rafale M for sure. IAC-1 will never...

I dont know why every Pakistani started to think EEZ as sovereign territorial water. And if you want to ask that India can lay underwater pipeline or not then read this https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/Beckman-Davenport-final.pdf

Maybe you are unaware of some facts, MiG-29 going to serve in IAF well by 2030, Rafale short term requirement to serve as replacement of MiG-27.

And how the Israel deploy ATGM in Iran? They have any expeditionary force? Hell even India China dont have expeditionary force. The main threat to Iran is KSA, not Israel, in more realistic sense.

Because they are martian in space suit. LoL.

If Block 60 was offered to Pakistan, then why Pakistan still buying Blk 52? There is any logic inside it?

Seems like you vowed to be idiotic. If I remember correctly I given you some links in a threads about these international laws. But it seems like your idiocies unable to grasp these. India don't need to. Even if we need to go head on, then India use dominance escalation in maritime SLOC.

Law to bypass EEZ? Are you serious? :rofl: What are you smoking? No one need permission to bypass Pakistani EEZ. Even no one need permission no lay pipeline in EEZ. EEZ are not sovereign & territorial waters. Hell, even no other nation need permission to enter in EEZ.

That is interesting, very interesting.

Choked Arabian Sea? Where you living, on Mars? Obviously the project cost going to increase to bypass Pakistaini EEZ? And if India want to show international laws to Pakistan then thats other thing. But choked? We dont have personnel deployed in Farkhor AFB. Period.

Obviously, deterrence is all about leaking, not secrecy. Lol, In hindi, that is not Republic of , but Ganrajaya. If you dont know hindi, dont try one.

WTF Iran have to do with 9/11?

Nope, if IRNSS is East, then Gagan is west. Totally different things.

Like what? Your higher moral ground? Leased never means owned or using against your foes (same as the case with NATO Sharing program), & if that is US property, then there should be US personnel that authorize launch process. But that is not the case. Also there is a difference between Turkey...

Yeah its UK property, I never saying it is not. If your mind unable to grasp whole argument, then its not my problem.

So as to counter narrative, India become foul way back in 1963, even when NPT was non existential? That is the whole gist of argument, not NPT. But about your points. You are indeed right about MTCR, but about NPT there is a loophole. And if Trident is US property, then why UK need whole...

Let him read China Pakistan axis first, then see what he conclude. I m always good bro, little bit advice again always keep in mind about Supreme National Interest of your nation, instead of keeping higher moral ground. That's help you alot.

Thanks for that, but I m better with Indian songs or sometimes Pakistani.