one more thing french will never be able to give us the pruduction rate and political favours as Russia & US combo can do for us look at the bigger picture
that said US is also willing to give complete TOT & even whole mcahine & tools(production line) will french do that i think not
as for...
@ Dr Somnath im also against IAF going for Rafale as it serves no purpose other than to have a counter weight to russian hegemony but for that i guess USA is a much safer bet and when it comes to countring china whether we like it or not one day we have to stand up to chinese hegemony and...
well bhai jan as per most posters here we are enemies ...right !
and a smart enemy tries best to find your weak spots and fight on his terms and try to manouver the results accordingli
and when owr work is done by a needle why should we use a sabre for the same :azn:
even most pakistanies including musharraf has said never take dont take the H.Gul seriousli remeber he is retired for more than 20 years now and all this tunda episode to me is just a stunt by congressies with a little help from there 'chaps' sitting across the border ...nuf said
with deu respect Mods bhai jaan that was past at least 10 years back stop dreaming about golries of your maazi haaliya tareekh me kha bhale maar rahen hain apke jaanisar
greedy french will always put spanners in wheels if ever rafale deal is signed and will never give TOT they promissed and will milk india as they did with scorpene subs
guys this thread is about do IAF needs rafale
the answer is no ...why
1. too damn expensive both in terms of list price and after sales
2. not too far ahead of the super sukoi which will start coming in a few months
3. we have better options we can go for F16-SU 35 combo
to me F 16 -...
IT is a wrong choice and very late ...why
1. we have 200 MKIs and 70 are on there way and still opposition have no answer to them when they will get MLU they will be more leathel than MKI+Rafale with there over sized rodome carrying an ASEA with latest EW upgrade & certainli more power and a...
who told you that India does not have so called TNWs secondli as CP earlier told Prahaar is a spin of AAD missile so it has to be highli manevourable at high speeds
two things
1. ask the OP who started by compaering the two missiles & how did china came into picture 150 KM rangea threat for china are you sireous or is it that pakistanies when cant deny there weakness bring china as face saver
2.who told you that prahaar is not as good or even...
Few things
1. NASR & Prahaar are both solid feul, quick reaction battle field tactical missile systems
2. NASR range is 60 KM while Prahaar's range is 150 KMs , while prahaar is able to carry more load aswell & while NASR will fire 2 Prahaar will fire 6 from a single launcher(more diff to...
so as per you all those who massacre innocent and unarmed citizens are warriors
no wonder you call Gen Zia Marsd E Momin -Mard E Haq after what he did in syriya & jordan for his arab masters