Aid from US up until around 2009 was only 500 million a year. The way some of these arm chair basement experts blow it into some sort of a bonanza that Pakistan is getting is really hilarious to hear over these years. Not to mention the fact that we lose far more money due to this WoT.
Umm.. hello, 85% of Americans believed this lie at the time and thought Iraq was making those WMDs and wanted to attack the US or another country. If that isn't a conspiracy theory, I don't what is.
I know the difference. What makes it an "observation" but not a conspiracy theory? So now...
O rly? :lol: Muslims making conspiracy theories you say?
What about:
Iraq having WMDs
Iran making nukes
ISI or Iran supporting Taliban and/or Al Qaeda
The other conspiracy theoriy crap your media and people talk about Iran, North Korea, China, Pakistan
I am sure you're aware of what a...
Ah bharatis keep going with their conspiracy theories, yet they call others conspiracy theories.. lol. Seriously guys, grow up, will ya? And do you guys seriously feel no shame in being highest grade hypocrites?
Read your post carefully. You don't mention insurgencies or anything specific. You mention "the killings". Is murder not a killing? And you call me a simpletom? :lol:
All anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Everything on the internet and real life experiences suggest otherwise. You can keep lying to yourself. 80% of your military is on our borders, and yet you keep calling us obsessed and whatnot. Quit lying yourself.
:lol::lol:
How would you know...
:lol::lol:
You're lying to yourself and you probably know that.
The amount of interest bharatis show in Pakistan's internal affairs -- from everything to economy, poverty, social issues, etc -- is mind boggling. Please quit lying.
:lol:
I think we need re-calibrate who the man in the relationship is and who the woman is. :lol:
She slapped you for what you do personally, if I were you I'd slap her back.
:lol:
Oh my..
Someone needs to check if they still have their manhood in place..
New version of a 'man': one...
I'll still stick to that statement. The last terrorist attack in Lahore before this was in January of last year. You have to look at the frequency of attacks, not that one happened just now, and therefore the terrorist can launch attacks freely in major cities.
So anywhere a big crime can take place, that means that area is not under government control? Is Manhattan in US government control? 9/11 happened there..
Terrorist attacks never cause fall in population growth dude.. I am not sure where you're getting that claim from. There are just so many people born that terrorist attacks are a drop in a bucket.
As far as economy, foreign investment etc, yes, and as I mentioned it's because of a perceived...
I don't think you quite understood my post..
regardless, yes people killed in terrorist attacks invokes a strong response, but at the end of the day you have to look at the logical conclusion. What does it mean in the grand scheme? Does 40 people killed in a bomb blast result in a less safer...
You're not making good analogies.
26 soldiers will killed by a foreign state, that's why that invoked stronger response.
126 soldiers were killed in a single event. If 275 soldiers were killed in a single event that'd invoke even a bigger response.
You have to look at the logical...