This guy takes the meaning of retard to the next level
Use your eyes for a moment and stop relying on the wikipedia. This tank has nothing in common with the M-60 other than the fact they are both tanks. The wikipedia info you're using is NOT talking about the Zulfiqar-3 tank I posted, but earlier tanks made in the 80's. But obviously you're too thick to understand that.
As for the rest of your BS, all tanks in the world today would be turned into junk with ATM's. We saw what hezbollah did to our super duper merkava did we not?
This Z-3 tank is not being invested in, the main Iranian tank will be the upcoming Karrar. We'll wait and see the capabilities of that and then judge. Now go back to editing and reading wikipedia.
Yeah of course, should I rely on Iranians that faked numerous amounts of times? should I remind you about the F313?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulfiqar_(tank)
How retarded are you? can't you read?
17.85 hp/ton (Zuliqfar 3)
"
he Zulfiqar-3[10] is the most "advanced" variant of the Zulfiqar family. It features considerable upgrades to the fire control system, chassis, engine and main gun. The new variant is equipped with the 2A46 125 mm smoothbore cannon with an autoloader, a laser rangefinder and a new fire control system.[11] It is also fitted with a reinforced turret and the wheels are covered by an armoured skirt.[12][13]"
2A46 is based on the T64's cannon and T72
"The tank has a distinctive box-shaped, steel-welded turret of local design.[4] The Zulfiqar is believed to be developed from major components of the Soviet T-72 and American M48 and M60 tanks.[5] The suspension is modelled on the M48 /M60 Patton tanks supplied to Iran by the U.S. The SPAT 1200 transmission also seems to be a local development of that of the M-60. Zulfiqar-1's combat weight has been reported to be 36 tonnes with a 780 hp diesel engine; giving the tank a 21.7 hp per ton ratio.[4] Some sources see resemblances between the Zulfiqar design and the Brazilian prototype Osório.[4]
The Zulfiqar is operated by a crew of three personnel. The automatic loader is believed to be the same one from the T-72 tank.[6]"
Nope
No ATGM can destroy the Merkava 4 now because of our advanced APS
And what? the same group that launched 1000 ATGMs against our Merkavas, destroying only 3, none of them are Mk4?
And what I was talking about that the Zulifiqar cannot fire ATGMs.
Yeah of course, should I rely on Iranians that faked numerous amounts of times? should I remind you about the F313?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulfiqar_(tank)
How retarded are you? can't you read?
17.85 hp/ton (Zuliqfar 3)
"
he Zulfiqar-3[10] is the most "advanced" variant of the Zulfiqar family. It features considerable upgrades to the fire control system, chassis, engine and main gun. The new variant is equipped with the 2A46 125 mm smoothbore cannon with an autoloader, a laser rangefinder and a new fire control system.[11] It is also fitted with a reinforced turret and the wheels are covered by an armoured skirt.[12][13]"
2A46 is based on the T64's cannon and T72
"The tank has a distinctive box-shaped, steel-welded turret of local design.[4] The Zulfiqar is believed to be developed from major components of the Soviet T-72 and American M48 and M60 tanks.[5] The suspension is modelled on the M48 /M60 Patton tanks supplied to Iran by the U.S. The SPAT 1200 transmission also seems to be a local development of that of the M-60. Zulfiqar-1's combat weight has been reported to be 36 tonnes with a 780 hp diesel engine; giving the tank a 21.7 hp per ton ratio.[4] Some sources see resemblances between the Zulfiqar design and the Brazilian prototype Osório.[4]
The Zulfiqar is operated by a crew of three personnel. The automatic loader is believed to be the same one from the T-72 tank.[6]"
Nope
No ATGM can destroy the Merkava 4 now because of our advanced APS
And what? the same group that launched 1000 ATGMs against our Merkavas, destroying only 3, none of them are Mk4?
And what I was talking about that the Zulifiqar cannot fire ATGMs.
Damn you are retarded
F-313 is the fateh-313 missile, that is fake? Are you high?
Once again retard, the wikipedia is NOT talking about zulfiqar-3 but Z-1 or 2. Here is the z-1:
Even then, we are talking about wikipedia here which can be edited by some 12 year old kid like yourself. Either way, you're too thick to understand which tank they're even talking about. This is what happens when you're clueless about what you're talking about
First tank in the first video, the Magach 7, retired, based on an M60, not Merkava.
AND THE SAME ABOUT THE ZULFIQAR 3What an absolute imbecile this guy is. Even your own wikipedia sources states this:
"The Zulfiqar-1 is based on the M60 Patton model acquired under the pre-revolution era. The Zulfiqar-1 was first revealed in public in 1994. A total of six prototypes were completed and field tested in 1997. The Zulfiqar-1 is protected by a welded steel hull and the turret is reinforced by a composite armour. The Zulfiqar-1 is armed with a 125mm Smoothbore gun taken from a T-72"
Under ZULFIQAR 1. How god damned retarded are you? You can't even read the source which you are posting
What?How's the Hasbara going, Little Beny?
Comparing prototypes to fully operational tanks, are we?
That's right little Benny, get your technical information from Wikipedia. Next you'll be assuring us of Wikipedia's ultimate reliability in the fields of;
electronics,
astronomy,
comics,
US Politics,
Crime,
cinema,
So kid, maybe you should find a better source of military-technical information other than fvcking Wikipedia. You could ask Kim Kardashian, or George Bush's butthole. I hear brick walls are great sources of information for Iranian main battle tank programs as well nowadays.
I said that the Zulqifar or what ever is based on the M-60You claimed Z-3 was based on M-60 ad yet even your own source did not say that. Are all you zionists this retarded?
