What's new

Zardari to Patterson: ‘Indian involvement in Mumbai attacks’

Hence my point ..that ISI involvement in the attack is not just a conspiracy theory..it is based on the accounts of those who were involved in the attack
...however if you want more non Indian sources..hinting at ISI involvement the attack..those I can provide.

No, it's a conspiracy theory, because nothing has come out of this whole headley incident, except things in the media. It's easy to put things out in the media As long as nothing is done about is, one has to assume that the evidence is shaky and the whole story is a fantastic conspiracy theory. Nothing was provided to Pakistan either. If you want to use empty statements in media as your basis, then I am sure you've come across the following:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakist...ts-terrorists-pak-terrorist-claims-video.html

On the basis of above video, why do you still refer to believing in Indian involvement in Pakistan as a conspiracy theory?
 
.
Err... I am talking about conspiracy theories against ISI.

my point was to make you aware that indian conspiracy theory is acceoted by intl community & pakistan's theory is not!!
 
.
my point was to make you aware that indian conspiracy theory is acceoted by intl community & pakistan's theory is not!!

That particularly claim is in no way relevant to the discussion.

There are still conspiracy theories made by Indians that have no evidence behind them.
 
.
No, it's a conspiracy theory, because nothing has come out of this whole headley incident, except things in the media. It's easy to put things out in the media As long as nothing is done about is, one has to assume that the evidence is shaky and the whole story is a fantastic conspiracy theory. Nothing was provided to Pakistan either. If you want to use empty statements in media as your basis, then I am sure you've come across the following:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakist...ts-terrorists-pak-terrorist-claims-video.html

On the basis of above video, why do you still refer to believing in Indian involvement in Pakistan as a conspiracy theory?

Why do you think nothing has come out of it..after all there was law suit against ISI admitted into a US court based on it.

Besides ISI is not at autonomous body ..it reflect your army and govts decision.
 
.
That particularly claim is in no way relevant to the discussion.

There are still conspiracy theories made by Indians that have no evidence behind them.

it's very much relevant to the thread my friend. Here we have your President coming out with a conspiracy theory saying it's a inside job by indians, which no one buys apart from people within pakistan!!
 
.
Why do you think nothing has come out of it..after all there was law suit against ISI admitted into a US court based on it.

Besides ISI is not at autonomous body ..it reflect your army and govts decision.

Nothing has come out of it in any meaningful way. Making statements in media is no big deal. The lawsuit against ISI was by a few families, hence irrelevant.
 
.
it's very much relevant to the thread my friend. Here we have your President coming out with a conspiracy theory saying it's a inside job by indians, which no one buys apart from people within pakistan!!

What I was discussing has no relevant with the LeT's involvement, which is what you're discussing.
 
. .
Nothing has come out of it in any meaningful way. Making statements in media is no big deal. The lawsuit against ISI was by a few families, hence irrelevant.

Are you saying if the said law suit is proved..then you will accept that ISI was involved in the attack..because it will no longer be just an accusation by a few families..but will carry the seal of US judiciary?
 
.
Are you saying if the said law suit is proved..then you will accept that ISI was involved in the attack..because it will no longer be just an accusation by a few families..but will carry the seal of US judiciary?

Is that relevant at this point? Nothing has been proven at this point, despite 2.5 years into the whole thing.

Besides, US judiciary has no such jurisdiction. You have to prove this at UN.
 
.
Is that relevant at this point? Nothing has been proven at this point, despite 2.5 years into the whole thing.

Besides, US judiciary has no such jurisdiction. You have to prove this at UN.

It is !!..because the case against Pakistan has been incrementally building up ..but still you say..not enough proof to prove Pakistan's involvement.

Besides US has no jurisdiction on ISI ..but if proved the case is no longer a conspiracy theory but a proven fact.
 
.
I think so pakistan is suffering from a phobia of 11's do you guys think both 9/11 & 26/11 was. A inside job seriously why will any country do that india did this just to look you guys bad your image was a bad even before 26/11
 
.
Even the Pakistanis know that this was a Pakistani operation. Kasab is living proof.
 
.
How it's been inclemently building up? No particular state has done ANYTHING about it, only some individuals that don't matter. The case has to be built in the UN or something, by states, not by unknown random individuals.

Yeah well let's wait for that to actually happen. It's a conspiracy theory, at least as of now. We've been waiting 2.5 years for this to proven. Even as of now there's nothing being done by any state.
 
.
How it's been inclemently building up? No particular state has done ANYTHING about it, only some individuals that don't matter. The case has to be built in the UN or something, by states, not by unknown random individuals.

Yeah well let's wait for that to actually happen. It's a conspiracy theory, at least as of now. We've been waiting 2.5 years for this to proven. Even as of now there's nothing being done by any state.

Simply because the guilty are not brought to book, doesn't make it a conspiracy theory. Adolf Eichmann wasn't hung until 1962 - the world did know the truth about what he did to the Hungarian Jews in 1945 itself. Similarly, it might be difficult to bring elements in the Pakistani state to book for 26/11 - doesn't mean it is theory.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom