qsaark
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,638
- Reaction score
- 0
Ejaz Saheb, would you explain this to me from the Islamic perspective?Two Nation Theory is wrong as it has no basis in Islam and that he disagrees with it totally.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ejaz Saheb, would you explain this to me from the Islamic perspective?Two Nation Theory is wrong as it has no basis in Islam and that he disagrees with it totally.
Having read all that I would like to present following.
U.S. and Canada live as two countries side by side, their trade is intertwined so that one cannot tell if it is from Canada or U.S. no restrictions no hurdles. both benifit.
their border is so open that at some places there are houses half in U.S and half in Canada.
so if the leaders of India and Pakistan wanted to make it so, they could do it by over comming their short sighted visions and their greed for high offices.
What is done is done, sit down talk like mature people, learn from and open up border like U.S. and Canada.
If Indian leadership could have little courage and allow Kashmir problem be solved by its people.
@FireFighter
None of the devout religious muslims and ulemas from for e.g. Deoband e.t.c supported the Two Nation Theory either. Infact, Iqbal never mentioned the words two nation theory as well. Some of the first graduates of AMU and his close friends of Sir Syed Ahmed were Hindus.
The Two Nation Theory was first explicitly propounded by Sarvarkar in his book Hindutva .
In conclusion I must put a straight question to pundit Jawahar Lal, how is India's problem to be solved if the majority community will neither concede the minimum safeguards necessary for the protection of a minority of 80 million people, nor accept the award of a third party; but continue to talk of a kind of nationalism which works out only to its own benefit? This position can admit of only two alternatives. Either the Indian majority community will have to accept for itself the permanent position of an agent of British imperialism in the East, or the country will have to be redistributed on a basis of religious, historical and cultural affinities so as to do away with the question of electorates and the communal problem in its present form.
It's been 60+ years but that communal problem in India still has not resolved where we have witnessed systematic massacres against Sikhs, Muslims, and Christian minorities.
See this is what you guys are fed with. Disinformation and total lies.
Amongst the prominent elite Deoband Ulema who supported the creation of Pakistan were Mualana Shabir Ahmed and Ashraf Ali Thanavi, whilst majority resisted only b/c they saw division of muslims and were of the opinion that muslims would come to power/rule again once the British leave. They been proven wrong in all accounts b/c that has not happened.
Here is Iqbal's rebuttal to Nehru where two nation theory originated:
It's been 60+ years but that communal problem in India still has not resolved where we have witnessed systematic massacres against Sikhs, Muslims, and Christian minorities.
Presidential Address, annual session of the All-India Muslim League, Allahabad, December 1930, by Sir Muhammad IqbalGentlemen, I have finished. In conclusion I cannot but impress upon you that the present crisis in the history of India demands complete organisation and unity of will and purpose in the Muslim community, both in your own interest as a community, and in the interest of India as a whole. The political bondage of India has been and is a source of infinite misery to the whole of Asia. It has suppressed the spirit of the East and wholly deprived her of that joy of self-expression which once made her the creator of a great and glorious culture. We have a duty towards India where we are destined to live and die. We have a duty towards Asia, especially Muslim Asia. And since 70 millions of Muslims in a single country constitute a far more valuable asset to Islam than all the countries of Muslim Asia put together, we must look at the Indian problem not only from the Muslim point of view, but also from the standpoint of the Indian Muslim as such. Our duty towards Asia and India cannot be loyally performed without an organised will fixed on a definite purpose. In your own interest, as a political entity among other political entities of India, such an equipment is an absolute necessity.
Ejaz Saheb, would you explain this to me from the Islamic perspective?
“Strange as it may appear Mr. Savarkar and Mr. Jinnah instead of being opposed to each other on the one nation versus two nations issue are in complete agreement about it. Both agree, not only agree but insist that there are two nations in India – one the Muslim nation and the other the Hindu nation.”
.....
“They differ only as regards the terms and conditions on which the two nations should be. Jinnah says India should be cut up into two, Pakistan and Hindustan, the Muslim nation to occupy Pakistan and the Hindu nation to occupy Hindustan. Mr. Savarkar on the other hand insists that, although there are two nations in India, India shall not be divided into two parts, one for the Muslims and the other for Hindus; that the two nations shall dwell in one country and shall live under the mantle of one single constitution: that the constitution shall be such that the Hindu nation will be enabled to occupy a predominant position that is due to it and the Muslim nation to made to live in the position of subordinate co-operation with the Hindu nation.”
Keep the borders between Pakistan and India closed forever. Pakistan-India relations is no where near U.S.-Canada relations. No Pakistani should trust indians, they hate Pakistan's very existence and unlike U.S. and Canada, Pakistan and India dont share the same ideologies infact we have conflicting ideologies and conflicting interests.
If Pakistan opens borders with any neighbour it will be with a friendly neighbour like China, not india.
frankly speaking the partition idea was proposed by the aligarh muslim elite and the awadh taluqadars.The people of present day pakistan literally had no idea of partition until 1946,there were a nobody in indian politics at that time .The Muslim league was nothing but a coterie of disgruntled nawabs and the old UP ruling elite .It never even had clout among the muslim masess including jinnah,faz-ul-haq of Praja karshak party(East bengal)and Mohammad shaukat ali and Sikandhar and khizr Hayat khan (Unionist party) Punjab,Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan of NWFP had more grip over the people.The Unionist Party only agreed to partition when they understood that Nehru would abolish the Zamindari system