Zaka Ashraf ‘proposes’ Jinnah-Gandhi trophy to BCCI, India is our brotherly nation. !

[Kuru]

From 1920 the whole standing of ML was no change in Muslim majority provinces (and establishment of sindh as separate province)

I can also make a few demands - and that too; based on religion - that I know you will reject. This way, I can claim that I tried to remain united but YOU fkd it up.

For example, I can make a nonsense demand that only Jains and Paris’s should have the right to vote. Ofcourse such demands won’t make sense, but you see, I’m trying to keep us united so you have to agree with me otherwise I’ll blame you for separation.

Once you reject the demands, I’ll call for ‘direct action day’ and let the civilians kill each other. Now that sounds like a very noble plan, you know.

Mujib also gave a ‘few points agenda’ to remain united - asking more autonomy for his state, and the rest is history.

That’s why I said, both Jinnah and Mujib have same ideologies. So let’s have a Mujib-Jinnah Cup, sponsored by BCCI.

 

[hatehs]

I can also make a few demands - and that too; based on religion - that I know you will reject. This way, I can claim that I tried to remain united but YOU fkd it up.

Why is it a nonsense demand? Bharat is built on reserwations and quotas for religion-based communities (mainly Hindu caste groups) who felt entitled enough to make demands for selective treatment. Apparently, almost every one of you chimps is one way or another, covered by a reserwation or quota:

Reservations in India: Almost every Indian now covered by one quota or another | India News - Times of India

India News: The new quota announced by the government on Monday will cover practically all of the population not already covered by reservations, reveals an analy

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

​

But ZINNAH was UNREAJONABLE for making RELIZION-BASED demands. Chale chal.

 

[ziaulislam]

I can also make a few demands - and that too; based on religion - that I know you will reject. This way, I can claim that I tried to remain united but YOU fkd it up.

For example, I can make a nonsense demand that only Jains and Paris’s should have the right to vote. Ofcourse such demands won’t make sense, but you see, I’m trying to keep us united so you have to agree with me otherwise I’ll blame you for separation.

Once you reject the demands, I’ll call for ‘direct action day’ and let the civilians kill each other. Now that sounds like a very noble plan, you know.

Mujib also gave a ‘few points agenda’ to remain united - asking more autonomy for his state, and the rest is history.

That’s why I said, both Jinnah and Mujib have same ideologies. So let’s have a Mujib-Jinnah Cup, sponsored by BCCI.

Dude .you are saying Muslims asked for division..I am saying it happened because u did not listen

Yes you can bring demands if u have the vote bank and representation that's how democracy works and anything works. Are you kid???

Jinnah had 96% seats in 1946 elections, Hindus /Nehru had two options

Form a federation or divide the country
Ironically Nehru not only divided the country but also formed a federation afterwards anyway

Now why are we going round and round. If you guys were serious you would have accepted the demands of 1/3 Indian population per British census(10 crore in 1947)

But nah Nehru didn't care and I guess he was representing people like you..so why bring it up? Partition happened because Hindus wanted it ...simple

 

[karmaa]

What are you talking about? Jinnah was one of the leading nationalists of his time. He ended up seeing through the facade presented by radical Hindus and saw their barbarity - he ended up not letting his guard down like others did in their dealings with them. This was a crucial mistake which leaders like Ambedkar made, and look what happens to their people now, getting urinated on by monkeys who chug down bottles of cow urine.

Every jihadi of India pretends first as nationalist , when he fails to achieve his goal he starts to support pakistan and talks more of muslim ummah .

 

[Goritoes]

B!tch please, Jinnah had class and stature while Ghani was sleeping with young girls and treating his wife like sh!t... I would take Jinnah as Leader over Ghandi any day.

 

[El Sidd]

Jinnah had a very dim view on cricket. It may be that the mortal disliked sports much alike his companion Gandhi who probably was physically incapable of any sport.

The colonial history of the sports of cricket is largely ignored in Pakistan. It serves a painful reminder of the darkest hour of our nation.

Political parties should include a promise of eradication of the sports of cricket in Pakistan. It has only provided the country with womanizing drug dealing corrupts and some lunatic missionaries.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Jinnah had class and stature

Ask 10 people from around the world, do they know Jinnah or they know Gandhi?

Jinnah who??

 

[El Sidd]

Ask 10 people from around the world, do they know Jinnah or they know Gandhi?

Jinnah who??

Jinnah is cherished by those he left behind as free citizens of the world.
Gandhi is hated by hundreds of millions of his own people who he freed from British slavery.

 

[Kuru]

Dude .you are saying Muslims asked for division..I am saying it happened because u did not listen

Yes you can bring demands if u have the vote bank and representation that's how democracy works and anything works. Are you kid???

Jinnah had 96% seats in 1946 elections, Hindus /Nehru had two options

Form a federation or divide the country
Ironically Nehru not only divided the country but also formed a federation afterwards anyway

Now why are we going round and round. If you guys were serious you would have accepted the demands of 1/3 Indian population per British census(10 crore in 1947)

But nah Nehru didn't care and I guess he was representing people like you..so why bring it up? Partition happened because Hindus wanted it ...simple

You missed the point in my previous post Zia. But it’s okay, we can disagree there.

But using your own logic, Mujib’s demands were also rejected to keep Pakistan united, isn’t it?

As per your own logic of “we wanted to remain united and hence we offered a few demands”, Mujib also wanted a United Pakistan and made few demands but his “genuine efforts” were turned down.

This is why I say Mujib and Jinnah had same ideology, and to keep their lasting legacy alive, we should have a Mujib-Jinnah trophy, with complete support of BCCI.

 

[karmaa]

No need.

!ndia can f#*k off...

They are too much of pussies to come to Pakistan.

Tell 'em to grow a pair before considering such a Tournament.

Arrange some good 7 star hotels and uninterrupted power supply , stop terrorists roaming on roads , peaceful atmosphere then we can think about a tour of pakistan .

Jinnah is cherished by those he left behind as free citizens of the world.
Gandhi is hated by hundreds of millions of his own people who he freed from British slavery.

Nobody knows jinnah , Iqbal or Zaka asraf in Europe or America .Everyone knows Gandhi , Indira gandhi , Rajiv gandhi and Rahul the Italian gandhi .

 

[ziaulislam]

You missed the point in my previous post Zia. But it’s okay, we can disagree there.

But using your own logic, Mujib’s demands were also rejected to keep Pakistan united, isn’t it?

As per your own logic of “we wanted to remain united and hence we offered a few demands”, Mujib also wanted a United Pakistan and made few demands but his “genuine efforts” were turned down.

This is why I say Mujib and Jinnah had same ideology, and to keep their lasting legacy alive, we should have a Mujib-Jinnah trophy, with complete support of BCCI.

Exactly mujeeb and jinnah had same ideology and both were right. Pakistan wasn't suppose to be a single country this was changed in 1947 at Delhi convention when mujeeb mentor sarwhadhy decided to do so given his concerns for india's dominance(guess he was right seeing bengaldesh now). He was unfortunately sided lined later by large military establishment and forced to resigned)

The one major and very big difference is one was a militant and other wasn't.

Seem people like you is why Pakistan was needed, someone who refuses to accept the reality of 10 crore people and their vote bank

Pakistan when wa made was one of most largest country in the world.

I was surprised and still am how did Hindu ignored Muslims demands but then I see Hindu saying Muslims don't exist and we all are Hindus or Indians and realize okay now I get it.

 

[Kuru]

Exactly mujeeb and jinnah had same ideology and both were right.

This is what I said in my first post in this thread and suggested that you guys should have Mujib-Jinnah Trophy instead.

For the rest, we can disagree with each other.

 

[ziaulislam]

This is what I said in my first post in this thread and suggested that you guys should have Mujib-Jinnah Trophy instead.

For the rest, we can disagree with each other.

Why?
What's your IQ.
Is cricket a political chess

If that's case you guys should have American Indian trophy or Russian Indian trophy


It a suggestion by second largest cricketing country to largest cricketing country

If you don't want play don't play.

But what's this hypocrisy of okay to play international leagues but not bilateral

Be a man and don't play international leagues and don't let Pakistani players on too


Indians pretending to change a money game into politics..the reason for no bilateral league is BCCI will make less money as it has to be shared as compared to IPL

 

[Kuru]

Why?
What's your IQ.
Is cricket a political chess

If that's case you guys should have American Indian trophy or Russian Indian trophy


It a suggestion by second largest cricketing country to largest cricketing country

If you don't want play don't play.

But what's this hypocrisy of okay to play international leagues but not bilateral

Be a man and don't play international leagues and don't let Pakistani players on too


Indians pretending to change a money game into politics..the reason for no bilateral league is BCCI will make less money as it has to be shared as compared to IPL

I don’t know why are you so triggered despite me being very calm with my responses.

We don’t play bilateral because I think (my personal opinion) the kinda money you make with it (as opposed to multilateral series - or any other sport for that matter) is a lot which Indian government probably believes can be used to sponsor terrorism in India.

I know you won’t accept it and it’s okay, we can again disagree but no need to get hyper buddy.

 

[karmaa]

I don’t know why are you so triggered despite me being very calm with my responses.

We don’t play bilateral because I think (my personal opinion) the kinda money you make with it (as opposed to multilateral series - or any other sport for that matter) is a lot which Indian government probably believes can be used to sponsor terrorism in India.

I know you won’t accept it and it’s okay, we can again disagree but no need to get hyper buddy.

No need to play if terrorism is not stopped.