Zaid Hamid CIA Asset

[dvk1982]

Then stop complaining

i normally never complain unless sth real crass is pushed into the minds of viewers.... Even for movies u have reviews however bad they may be...

 

[Developereo]

oh then you should also laugh at british american and whole world media. cuz these days what ever is in Indian media is on british media in couple of days.


at least indian mediad do not lay the claim that he is amar singh


and above all

indian muslims and lower castes are with pakistan we should declare war on india. they will fight from our side


man you guys should have done that thinking about the uprising within india for your support............



After listening to him each Indian realizes how much identity crisis you guys have and how much you guys have been screwed.... thats the secret behind watching him....

You misunderstand me. I am not defending Zaid Hamid. He is a TV personality and he has his opinions. I am neither for him or against him. I do not even watch him.

I am simply pointing out that India has its share of sensationalist jingoists.

 

[dvk1982]

That's the problem right there. Most Indians have lost the ability to distinguish between Bollywood sensationalism and TOI/Rediff sensationalism.

whatever u say boss... I pity indians if they consider Zaid's statements seriously.. on the other hand we can always argue abt the merits of what we get to see from his show... One thing is for sure.. It has Entertainment value.. esp when so much of passion is put in....

 

[Bushy]

In that case, I stand corrected. The Indian equivalent of Zaid Hamid is not Bharat Verma, but Times of India, Rediff, NDTV, etc, etc.

In fact, most mainstream Indian media would qualify as jingoistic tabloid, in the same league as Bharat Verma or Zaid Hamid.



That's the problem right there. Most Indians have lost the ability to distinguish between Bollywood sensationalism and TOI/Rediff sensationalism.

Oh yes Developereo, you are so right. We assassinated Musharraf when he visited Delhi for India Today Conclave (The one you see these days is an imposter!). The Pakistani singers in Indian TV programs were poisoned! Can you believe, the articles of Pakistani writers in TOI, India Today, Hindustan Times, are all put into the 'fun' section! Even the Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi's interview in Rediff was meant only to ridicule the Pakistanis. Oh damn this media, now I hate Pakistanis sooooooooo much.

Thanks man, you just opened my eyes

 

[Bushy]

You misunderstand me. I am not defending Zaid Hamid. He is a TV personality and he has his opinions. I am neither for him or against him. I do not even watch him.

I am simply pointing out that India has its share of sensationalist jingoists.

Yes, Indian media is sensationalist when you watch IndiaTV or AajTak and a few more. But equating ToI, and HT and IE, with Zaid Hamid... no way man.

By the way, how come I never see any of you criticizing Punjab Kesari?

 

[Developereo]

the articles of Pakistani writers in TOI, India Today, Hindustan Times, are all put into the 'fun' section

Thank you, you just proved my point about how puerile and unprofessional Indian media is. Anybody can cherry pick the silliest crap from any collection to score cheap points.

DAWN invites serious articles from Indian columnists and puts them on the front page.

Too bad the Indian media doesn't have to guts or integrity to do likewise with respectable Pakistani journalists. Why are they so afraid to expose their readers to a different point of view?

Punjab Kesari?

Who? what? Sounds like a dessert...

 

[Bushy]

Thank you, you just proved my point about how puerile and unprofessional Indian media is. Anybody can cherry pick the silliest crap from any collection to score cheap points.

DAWN invites serious articles from Indian columnists and puts them on the front page.

Too bad the Indian media doesn't have to guts or integrity to do likewise with respectable Pakistani journalists. Why are they so afraid to expose their readers to a different point of view?

Now what do I talk with you, when you can't even differentiate between a statement and a sarcasm?

Who? what? Sounds like a dessert...

You have no idea what you are missing lol Yes, it is a dessert after some heavy reading

P.S. You are the third one I am noticing after Omar1984 and BATMAN who has first edited my post and then quoted it so as to suit your convenient replies. Be a man, post it in its entirety and let everyone see what you are replying to.

 

[Developereo]

Now what do I talk with you, when you can't even differentiate between a statement and a sarcasm?

I don't read TOI and Rediff religiously so I don't know what is in the fun section. It is entirely plausible that Indian media would pick up some loony Pakistani writers to try and make some silly point.

P.S. You are the third one I am noticing after Omar1984 and BATMAN who has first edited my post and then quoted it so as to suit your convenient replies. Be a man, post it in its entirety and let everyone see what you are replying to.

I have not altered a single word you wrote.

I replied to relevant parts of your post. Take a couple minutes and browse around this and other forums. Trimming quoted posts down to relevant sections is the norm in internet forums. In fact, some forums don't even allow a post if it contains fewer characters than the quoted post.

 

[Bushy]

I don't read TOI and Rediff religiously so I don't know what is in the fun section. It is entirely plausible that Indian media would pick up some loony Pakistani writers to try and make some silly point.



I have not altered a single word you wrote.

I replied to relevant parts of your post. Take a couple minutes and browse around this and other forums. Trimming quoted posts down to relevant sections is the norm in internet forums. In fact, some forums don't even allow a post if it contains fewer characters than the quoted post.

I did look around, and did I not cite two other examples? Of course I agree with you man! Not only trimming but also twisting the quoted posts is a norm. But mere the fact that something is a norm, does not make it right.

You trimmed my sarcastic remark (because rest of it would have shown what I meant), then quoted it as a serious one, and portrayed me as confessing to your allegations.

If you remember, Gasht did exactly that while posting Zaid Hamid's videos, where Zaid Hamid himself confessed being a friend of the CIA (though it was sarcastic). Now if my sarcastic remarks can be taken at face value, then your Zaid Hamid is just as much a CIA asset. But don't worry, I am more mature than that.

Such trickery is very cheap and doesn't serve any purpose, I suggest you come out of it.

 

[Developereo]

Not only trimming but also twisting the quoted posts is a norm.

It may be a norm for you, but I haven't seen anyody here change someone's actual words in a quoted post.

You trimmed my sarcastic remark (because rest of it would have shown what I meant), then quoted it as a serious one,

I truly thought these were actual articles. I have seen stranger allegations in print, and I wouldn't put anything past sensationalist writers on either side of the border.

and portrayed me as confessing to your allegations.

I did nothing of the sort. I took your post at face value.

Such trickery is very cheap and doesn't serve any purpose, I suggest you come out of it.

There was no trickery involved; I truly thought you were quoting actual articles.