Youth killed in anti Israeli protests in Kashmir

[Jzaib]

indians cant digest the fact that they are muslims first and indian later .. i always advocate that to them .. for a Muslim his religion is above his nationality her family or friends ... Muslim all over the world is bonded by islam ... may be it is Gaza or may be it is kashmir ..

 

[solkahn]

Israel was Jewish land as long as the obeyed GOD, THEY DISOBEYED GOD IN RETURN THEY WERE ANNIHILATED, and muslims got what they had it's simple how long you there gona keep it, the end of ISRAHEL is nearing day by day night by night to its END as all the prophecies of QURAN are gona be reaching there in due time

 

[Biplab Bijay]

Truth hurts manipulation &denial can't change reality of obvious facts

Truth hurts manipulation &denial can't change reality of obvious facts.

 

[ranjeet]

indians cant digest the fact that they are muslims first and indian later .. i always advocate that to them .. for a Muslim his religion is above his nationality her family or friends ... Muslim all over the world is bonded by islam ... may be it is Gaza or may be it is kashmir ..

What exactly has being Muslims first brought to them? Nothing but Death. All over the world Muslims are killing Muslims for being more Muslims than the other. First decide what and who is real Muslim.

 

[Fracker]

Oh for your gods sake. Read before you rant. The Raja of Kashmir had all the rights. All princely states did. They were legally given the option to choose and the Raja did choose. He signed the IoA.
Legally, it is valid.

Raja of Kashmir was the ruler, but as per separation plan by British. Rights were with Kashmiri people, bot British. If that was the case then many of the state ruler joined Pakistan, but since majority of the people living there were hindus, in 1948 War those was given back to India.

Accept one thing, if ruler has the right, then Junagadh, Hyderabad in india should be given back to Pakistan, if people has the right then Kashmiri should choose where ever they wanna join. Not some Raja.

This does not even make sense. Please write coherent sentences.
The land historically belonged to Jews, then the romans kicked them out and the cycle continued till jews and christians kicked muslims out. Because you, choose to fixate on a particular period of time when muslims were living there does not mean it becomes muslim land.
You can(if you want) choose to look at different periods of time when muslims were not on that land.

And now Israel is Jewish land.

So you mean if we have power, we can literally murder/or throw all the White in USA, and return whole States back to North Indians?

Truth hurts manipulation &denial can't change reality of obvious facts

It does, and will.. until things like struggle for stopping strategic partnership in AF, Water Problems, Sia Chin Struggle, other things surrounding will continue, until one fall. And for your information, Muslims and tribes don't go back until the oppressor empire falls, this is history of Afghanistan, and india can become next.

 

[solkahn]

Hopefully endian get get nuked because if we're gona die thirsty and without our jugular then we should take all the yindoos with us problem solved. Oh yeah

 

[Jzaib]

What exactly has being Muslims first brought to them? Nothing but Death. All over the world Muslims are killing Muslims for being more Muslims than the other. First decide what and who is real Muslim.

well bowing down to imperials or dieing standing up for a cause ...we prefer the the later .. india understand money and their own interest .. we fools dont work that way .. if we see something wrong and believe it in heart it is so hard for us to maintain silence


muslims started killing muslims after the west decided to come and fix the proplem and bcoz of their interference ... for example afghanistan would have been peaceful place if russian wouldnt have attacked them... iraq was way more peaceful b4 US came and give them democracy... libya was peaceful before euorpe intervention, same gues for syria ... then u pick and choose .. then the west have no problem supporting martial law in egypt and supporting dictators when it suites them .. too much intrest of west in the wealth of middle east is the main problem .. keeping them dividing and pitching them against one other bvenift the west .. like they support Saddam attack on iran .. they never interfered .. then when iraq attacked in Kuwait

 

[solkahn]

Hopefully all YINDOOS SHOULD get nuked because if we're gona die thirsty and without our jugular then we should take all the yindoos with us problem solved. Oh yeah

 

[Contrarian]

Raja of Kashmir was the ruler, but as per separation plan by British. Rights were with Kashmiri people, bot British. If that was the case then many of the state ruler joined Pakistan, but since majority of the people living there were hindus, in 1948 War those was given back to India.

Accept one thing, if ruler has the right, then Junagadh, Hyderabad in india should be given back to Pakistan, if people has the right then Kashmiri should choose where ever they wanna join. Not some Raja.

Pakistan did not really take anything and give anything back. It lost more territory in each war than it captured.

You are right on Junagadh though. No doubt Junagadh could have joined Pakistan and legally had the right to do so. But we played our cards well and despite Pakistani protests we captured it.
It does not take away from the fact that J&K accession to India is legal with IoA signed. Pakistan tried to do what we did with Junagadh and Hyderabad. Only thing is you did not succeed. You got a small part of J&K.

So you mean if we have power, we can literally murder/or throw all the White in USA, and return whole States back to North Indians?

How else do you think the Arabs came and settled there if not for conquest?
And if conquest is disallowed, then Arabs have no right over Israel.

 

[Fracker]

Pakistan did not really take anything and give anything back. It lost more territory in each war than it captured.
No doubt Junagadh could have joined Pakistan and legally had the right to do so. But we played our cards well and despite Pakistani protests we took it.
It does not take away from the fact that J&K accession to India is legal with IoA signed..

Double standards, but can this double standard of your mental, can stop us not malign with India? The time bomb which India is sitting, will soon bust and you will see how wrong decisions were made while not solving the issue on right time.

How else do you think the Arabs came and settled there if not for conquest?
And if conquest is disallowed, then Arabs have no right over Israel.

As of history, Conquest is not disallowed, no where, but removing the locals and putting someone else is wrong from the start. Most of the Christians locals reverted into Islam and become Muslim Majority. Since Islamic Empire local Language was Arabic, they adopt Arabic, like it happened in iraq, syaria, Turkey, Kuwait, and Edgypt. No conquer of Jerusalem from muslims bring this madness. They didn't kick out Christians, neither they stop Jews to enter. This Jews only sagga or Christians only Sagga is from Christians only who did this in history with Jews, and now they are doing same while allowing Israel to exists with No Muslim.

 

[ranjeet]

well bowing down to imperials or dieing standing up for a cause ...we prefer the the later .. india understand money and their own interest .. we fools dont work that way .. if we see something wrong and believe it in heart it is so hard for us to maintain silence


muslims started killing muslims after the west decided to come and fix the proplem and bcoz of their interference ... for example afghanistan would have been peaceful place if russian wouldnt have attacked them... iraq was way more peaceful b4 US came and give them democracy... libya was peaceful before euorpe intervention, same gues for syria ... then u pick and choose .. then the west have no problem supporting martial law in egypt and supporting dictators when it suites them .. too much intrest of west in the wealth of middle east is the main problem .. keeping them dividing and pitching them against one other bvenift the west .. like they support Saddam attack on iran .. they never interfered .. then when iraq attacked in Kuwait

Seeing how USA and KSA treats your country I would beg to differ, And as far as seeing something wrong and not mainting silence about it, there are umpteen examples where you guys maintained silence and couldn't even moan a little in discomfort. So save us the selective murder of humanity rants, it doesn't suit you guys.

Regarding the internal politics of how and when the blood bath started in Islamic countries,I don't really care.

 

[Jzaib]

Seeing how USA and KSA treats your country I would beg to differ, And as far as seeing something wrong and not mainting silence about it, there are umpteen examples where you guys maintained silence and couldn't even moan a little in discomfort. So save us the selective murder of humanity rants, it doesn't suit you guys.

Regarding the internal politics of how and when the blood bath started in Islamic countries,I don't really care.

what ever

 

[Contrarian]

Double standards, but can this double standard of your mental, can stop us not malign with India? The time bomb which India is sitting, will soon bust and you will see how wrong decisions were made while not solving the issue on right time.

Let me put this straight. If you are under the assumption that Pakistan does not use double standards then you are wrong or naive.
Kashmir remains with India not because its legal but because we were able to keep it in war. If we had lost in the wars, all the legality in the world could not have got it back to us.

When Pakistan attacked Kashmir, it was in contravention to laws, but that would not have made an iota of difference had Pakistan succeeded.

As of history, Conquest is not disallowed, no where, but removing the locals and putting someone else is wrong from the start. Most of the Christians locals reverted into Islam and become Muslim Majority. Since Islamic Empire local Language was Arabic, they adopt Arabic, like it happened in iraq, syaria, Turkey, Kuwait, and Edgypt. No conquer of Jerusalem from muslims bring this madness. They didn't kick out Christians, neither they stop Jews to enter. This Jews only sagga or Christians only Sagga is from Christians only who did this in history with Jews, and now they are doing same while allowing Israel to exists with No Muslim.

Yes, many Christians converted and many were sent away. Same with Jews, but there is no conclusion that Israel is Muslim land. That is what I was telling you.
You can choose to take any slice of history and find that Israeli land was held by different faiths.

 

[Fracker]

Let me put this straight. If you are under the assumption that Pakistan does not use double standards then you are wrong or naive.
Kashmir remains with India not because its legal but because we were able to keep it in war. If we had lost in the wars, all the legality in the world could not have got it back to us.

When Pakistan attacked Kashmir, it was in contravention to laws, but that would not have made an iota of difference had Pakistan succeeded.

I said same thing, let's see for how long.

Yes, many Christians converted and many were sent away. Same with Jews, but there is no conclusion that Israel is Muslim land. That is what I was telling you.
You can choose to take any slice of history and find that Israeli land was held by different faiths.

I said earlier, Land belong to the people living their, when Muslims came, most of the Christians converted who were living their. The Language Become Arab, and Jerusalem started to be known as Arab Land a.k.a Arab people. what ever suites you. And when Muslim Conquer no Christian was sent back, no Jews was kicked out (in reality, they were already kicked out by Christians). Hazrat Umar (RA) allowed all religions, christians, jews & muslims all to practice their religious duties in the city. So those jews who return back to city, were also called arabs? This land remain united with arab from 670s upto 1911. So, this was the arab land with arab people. Arab gave this name Palestine to this land. So Arabs a.k,a Muslims, x-christians, x-jews were also x-israeli who used to own the land, started to be called as palestinis?

Then this British conquer this land they displaced the original arabs a.k. owner of the land from those who were living in Europe to Palestine. Till 1947, their was no Israel. In 1948, UN allowed original owners (arabs) to be displaced and handover the land to jews of europe.

 

[rockstar08]

No difference between Invaders terrorists, be it Pakistanis or Arabs.

@all indians



very disappointing behavior from an indian ... you use democracy and protest against your own state for the support of some unknown people .. call yourselves Secular .. BS


No no. coz muslims are all the same, be it Pakistani or Arab? Invading other's the lands not belongs to them, imposing their views on others, spreading their faith with sword.

i never say Pakistan is secular
and this thread is about Kashmir .. they are not your property , they are under your oppression