Your lot is of looters, martial law implementers,'- Sanaullah to retired general

[Finer]

Did you even read the article? If you had you will see that RS even dismissed Generals as well.

Anyway the point is that a guy that himself is the product of Zia's Martial Law is pointing fingers at the people that created him.

If that was the case, then why did General Raheel protect Musharraf from the accountability using exit-strategy?

Nawaz Sharif is the product of the main establishment, not just Zia-ul-Haq. And so is MQM. I think you missed the irony of the point which you posted the clue whether as sarcasm or in serious mode.

Again, those are small parties. Even in democracy, many small parties have been dismissed as well. But when it comes to the bigger party, that is where the accountability is tested the most and as often, it is proven unheard.

At least in democracy, bigger players like Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif were not spared. But when it comes to the bigger players in the main establishment, unheard from 1947 to this day. Not even Musharraf is being taken to the accountability thank to General Raheel. It is probably due to the fear of getting tag like traitor hence nobody speak for the accountability against the main establishment.

 

[Imad.Khan]

If that was the case, then why did General Raheel protect Musharraf from the accountability using exit-strategy?

Nawaz Sharif is the product of the main establishment, not just Zia-ul-Haq. And so is MQM. I think you missed the irony of the point which you posted the clue whether as sarcasm or in serious mode.

Again, those are small parties. Even in democracy, many small parties have been dismissed as well. But when it comes to the bigger party, that is where the accountability is tested the most and as often, it is proven unheard.

At least in democracy, bigger players like Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif were not spared. But when it comes to the bigger players in the main establishment, unheard from 1947 to this day. Not even Musharraf is being taken to the accountability thank to General Raheel. It is probably due to the fear of getting tag like traitor hence nobody speak for the accountability against the main establishment.

so i am sure you would have proof of your claim that RS protected Mushy from accountability, right?

Also your leader was incharge of Pakistan when Mushy case was running, is he that impotent that he can't even hold his enemy accountable?

 

[Rakshas]

He needs another treatment by armed forces because he forgets how badly he was humiliated when he bad mouthed against army.

He was found naked, all facial and head hair shaved with full body showing beating marks.

 

[Finer]

so i am sure you would have proof of your claim that RS protected Mushy from accountability, right?

Also your leader was incharge of Pakistan when Mushy case was running, is he that impotent that he can't even hold his enemy accountable?

Because of military takeover twice in the history with the main establishment? Or the fact that he was almost hanged to death after the military takeover? Naturally, Nawaz Sharif would be cautious to avoid military takeover for the third time.

How come General Raheel is able to punish small keys yet remain resistance on the bigger keys like Musharraf? What was stopping General Raheel from implementing accountability against Musharraf? There is no democracy takeover unlike military takeover with the history of sentencing Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto to death and almost did the same with Nawaz Sharif.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Because of military takeover twice in the history with the main establishment? Or the fact that he was almost hanged to death after the military takeover? Naturally, Nawaz Sharif would be cautious to avoid military takeover for the third time.

How come General Raheel is able to punish small keys yet remain resistance on the bigger keys like Musharraf? What was stopping General Raheel from implementing accountability against Musharraf? There is no democracy takeover unlike military takeover with the history of sentencing Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto to death and almost did the same with Nawaz Sharif.

Its not the responsibility of COAS to hold accountable ex-Military men. Its the responsibility of the sitting govt. So don't blame RS for the incompetence of NS, and if NS is too scarred to do it then he shouldn't have taken the top spot

 

[hassamun]

Did anyone ask Sanaullah that did he know that the First Martial Law in Pakistan was done by a Civil Head of State in 1958?

During the tenures of Field Marshall Ayub and General Musharraf there have been great economic improvements in Pakistan. Yes they have made a few wrong decisions but they are also human...

Why do then most civilians hate the armed forces so much?

Some things done by General Musharraf...
http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/2092/50-reasons-pakistan-needs-musharraf/

 

[Thəorətic Muslim]

Interestingly Pakistani Generals are actually more popular than it's politicians.

And while the question is of pensions and land given.

Where does the Pakistani Cricket teams get their "gifts" from? How can politicians who don't even own a house in their name get the money from?

Where's the accountability for losing half of your country?

Where's the accountability of taking responsibility? The Army is doing policing duties in Karachi, in Sindh, in Lahore, in Multan, in KPK, in Balochistan. Whys a politician's peacock protected by a dozen of Punjab's Elite Force, Billo riding around in a 35 vehicle convoy, another Parliamentarian protected by 2 police trucks while riding his heavy bike?

An entire division is raised for protecting Chinese, what about the 180Million Pakistanis? Why aren't Police forces being expanded for that duty? Or they're basic duty of protecting the public?

He's the "Law Minister" why aren't terrorists being put behind jails rather than walking around Lahore? or Multan and Faisalabad?

Army Generals across the world are thanked for their service and given pensions, positions on multinational corporations board of directors (be it civilian or military industrial), and yes land.

When Justice is being given to politicians why is it they start blasting other institutions? or political dynasties?

Justice will reach them too, it's just that it's a bit<h to you first.

 

[Finer]

Its not the responsibility of COAS to hold accountable ex-Military men. Its the responsibility of the sitting govt. So don't blame RS for the incompetence of NS, and if NS is too scarred to do it then he shouldn't have taken the top spot

True but Military takeover will prevent the accountability against top league of the main establishment. Precisely to the point where accountability is unheard when it comes to the main establishment.

In Turkey, the military takeover is treason where the accountability applies to all including their main establishment.

Did anyone ask Sanaullah that did he know that the First Martial Law in Pakistan was done by a Civil Head of State in 1958?

During the tenures of Field Marshall Ayub and General Musharraf there have been great economic improvements in Pakistan. Yes they have made a few wrong decisions but they are also human...

Why do then most civilians hate the armed forces so much?

Some things done by General Musharraf...
http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/2092/50-reasons-pakistan-needs-musharraf/

Most civilians hate the military takeover because they impose their authority against the wills of Pakistanis? Why do you think the military takeover is considered as dictatorship? Pakistan is not fond of military takeover given the history.

 

[Zibago]