What's new

Yogi Adityanath’s anti-Mughal stand has reasons. Akbar identified himself as a ghazi

LOL. Arabs ate lizards and camels, not poultry and beef.

Central asian invaders ate Horses, not goats and poultry and fish.

75% of global spices are from India. Any dish with Indian spices in it is an Indian invention. Period.

Now go list out the Number of non veg dishes WITHOUT Indian spices

These gutter illiterates which probably represents unfortunately vast majority of hindu faith adherants today will be saying these exact brainwashed things, Probably RSS has taught them that what history they have previously learnt is garbage and they need to relearn it from RSS/BJP. They cry about hindu persecution during muslim period and demolition of mythical 80,000 temples, the list goes on and on with this hate filled gibberish. I recently shared Kapil mishra's tweet how taj mahal was a hindu temple called teju mahalaya

India is going through jungle raj today and hindutvas behaving as junglis.

regards
We will do what ever we desire to do with it. Exhume the grave or turn it into a public toilet. its non of your concern.

How is taj mahal indian when it was constructed by the foreign mughals? :lol:

regards
 
Last edited:
Kashmiri is not Indian .
Part controlled by India Is 100% Indian and 100% Kashmiri.

That little strip you call Azad Kashmir is not Kashmiri, they eat different food, 99% people there speak a different language and have a totally different culture in every aspect apart from being muslim. It is basically north Punjab, full of Pakistani Punjabis. Mirpur has no Kashmiri culture. It is Kashmir in name only but reasonably developed because expat Punjabis, mostly from the UK have poured a lot of money there and built their houses and other civvie infrastructure has come up.

I was told this by a Kashmiri muslim, and on doing some research actually found it to be true. The wazwan is some of the best food in India but it's not everyday food but mostly for occasions. Regular homestyle Kashmiri chicken/mutton etc is also proper delish though.

You keep yours, we keep ours.

Also, drop the charade of caring for Indian Kashmiris, we saw ZERO sympathy from you guys for Indian Kashmiri deaths in the last arty fight from a few days ago. LOC to IB is the only solution in this age of nuclear weapons. Sadly neither our govt, not yours would ever agree to such a settlement of the matter.
WTF is original Indian food ? Biriyani, Kormas and Kebabs ARE original Indian food dumbass.

You think Indians did not figure out how to roast meat over a coal fire and infusing it with Indain spices ? :lol:

Imagine someone gloating over eating rotting corpses of animals and calling Vegetables as poop. Pathetic.
"Biriyani, Kormas and Kebabs ARE original Indian food "

I'm down with that.

Nobody eats rotting meat, smartass. Watch that video, that is about Hindu temple food without using ingredients such as tomatoes and potatos that came from outside of Bharatvarsh. Damn Portuguese bought them here.

It's OG brahman food, funeral food as I call it.. but funeral food is better these days because you can have aloo tamatar subzi at least lol

and well done, ban ho gya fir se.. I can teach you stealth trolling if you want. :P
 
Last edited:
So the truth is out, even Akbar disliked Hindus.

Mughals civilization is foreign to India. I'm happy Indians are realizing it. Hindutva India needs to ban everything associated with Mughal culture.
Since they are at it. May be we can find a way to dismantle mughal monuments and recreate them in pakistan? Let's start with taj Mahal first. They should completely disown their mughal heritage.
 
If it was built as a Mahal and not as a Kabra then it is clear that the Hindus built it since it was on Raja Jai singh's land. :lol:



Feel free to PROVE me wrong.


What is "radical" Hindu ?

Raja Jai Singh was Aurengzeb's biggest supporter and general.
 
Is that a joke?

No.

In a fresh controversy over the Taj Mahal, BJP leader Vinay Katiyar claimed that the 17th century monument was built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan after destroying a Hindu temple. Katiyar claimed the Hindu temple which existed there earlier was called “Tejo Mahalaya” and it housed a Shivling. This was, however, not the first time a member of the BJP had made similar claims. In 2014, BJP leader Lakshmikant Bajpayee also said the “Tejo Mahalaya” existed before the Taj Mahal.

That's the old narrative. The new one is no temple was demolished, Taj Mahal itself is Hindu building owned by Hindu Jai Singh and borrowed by Shahjahan to bury his wife and in return Jai Singh got some fairytale housing somewhere else.

Hindutva continues to produce some of the best historians in human history. :lol:

@paritosh You may be surprised by this, but not your children, they will learn this in school and this will be normal history for them and any Muslim saying otherwise is fanatic anti-Hindu. This sort of fabrication and revisionism has been going on for decades.
 
Last edited:
No.



That's the old narrative. The new one is no temple was demolished, Taj Mahal itself is Hindu building owned by Hindu Jai Singh and borrowed by Shahjahan to bury his wife and in return Jai Singh got some fairytale housing somewhere else.

Hindutva continues to produce some of the best historians in human history. :lol:

@paritosh You may be surprised by this, but not your children, they will learn this in school and this will be normal history for them and any Muslim saying otherwise is fanatic anti-Hindu. This fabrication and revisionism has been going on for decades.
You know how to hit the mark mate, that did hit home.
While my original intent was to ridicule the poster I quoted, by dragging him into the depths of the stupid revisionism that you mentioned in the first part of your post, the wisdom in the rest of your post has made me realise the futility of resisting what is to come.
There are enough people in India who represent the other side, I have hope.
 
No country can claim that it follows the ancient rituals or culture and has no newer/foreign element to it. There is a history written by Mughals, there is a history which is being rewritten by far right Hindus and there is something in between.
If Mughals indeed abolished some customs/Rituals that were tenets of honduism, then they surely be condemned by the Hindus.
Hindus should reinstate satti while at it. How dare they still allow the British to change their religious freedom even 70yrs post independence
 
Only cow slaughter and tax are Islamic. The rest, including slavery (caste) are hardcore Hindu culture.

I want your gov to ban Mughal food, clothing, architecture etc. that you Hindus appropriated.

add bathing and toilets to...


true Rss hindus in thier natural element....

1605588204853.png
 
Looks like Mughal architecture to me...and the whole world. Enjoy!

LOL

10 Facts that suggests Taj Mahal was built on a Shiva Temple
by Aayush




An ivory-white marble mausoleum on the south bank of the Yamuna river in the Indian city of Agra where around 8 million people visit every year and at times there are over 50 thousand people visiting on a single day is non-other than one of the seven wonders of the world, The Taj Mahal. People all over the world famously identifies this beautiful piece of architecture as a sign of love. History tells us that it is so due to it being a tomb built by the Mughal emperor, Shah Jahan, to house the tomb of his favorite wife, Mumtaz. We are all aware of these facts that have been taught to us since our school days.
Taj-Mahal.jpg
Photo by Anubhav Vanamamalai on 500px.com

As a turn of events, India’s government has been dragged into a bizarre row over whether the Taj Mahal, widely seen as a masterpiece of Muslim architecture, should be converted into a Hindu temple. A legal case, first brought by six lawyers in Agra in April, claims that the monument famously built by a seventeenth-century Mughal emperor as a tomb for his beloved wife was originally an ancient shrine to the Hindu god Shiva. The petition, which was accepted by the Agra Court, it calls for ownership of the monument to be transferred to Hindus.

Here are some evidence that suggests that the claims could actually be true and suggests it to be a site of Hindu origin being a Shiva Temple.
Tejomahalaya.jpg
source
#1. Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient center of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night during the month of Shravan. However, during the last few centuries, the residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples, which are Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar, and Rajarajeshwar. Sadly, they had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently, the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Nagnatheshwar i.e., The Lord Great God of Agra, The Deity of the King of Cobras.

#2. The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats and their name for Shivaji is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28, 1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Linga. From this, it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej.

#3. The octagonal shape of the Taj Mahal has a special Hindu significance because Hindus alone have special names for the eight directions, and celestial guards assigned to them. The pinnacle points to the heaven while the foundation signifies to the netherworld. Hindu forts, cities, palaces, and temples generally have an octagonal layout or some octagonal features so that together with the pinnacle and the foundation they cover all the ten directions in which the king or God holds sway, according to Hindu belief. A central dome with octagonal cupolas at its four corners is a common feature of Hindu temples.
#4. The Taj Mahal has identical entrance arches on all four sides. This is a typical Hindu building style known as Chaturmukhi, i.e. four-faced. Chaturmukhi style is mainly seen in Jain temples in India and Hindu temples of Southeast Asia. Here, the size & scale of the central structure and its form/elevation is completely different from that of the Taj as can be seen in examples below. The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the Hindu style. They are used as lamp towers during the night and watch towers during the day. Such towers serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding altars and the altar set up for God Satyanarayan worship have pillars raised at the four corners. The Taj Mahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been an Islamic building it should have faced the west.

#5. The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the ‘Tej-Linga’ amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya. Also, Hindu temples are often built on river banks and sea beaches. The Taj is one such built on the bank of the Yamuna river an ideal location for a Shiva temple.
#6. A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory, has revealed that the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan, since the doors of the Taj, broken open by Muslim invaders repeatedly from the 11th century onwards, had to b replaced from time to time. The Taj edifice is much more older. It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e., almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan.
#7. Description of the gardens around the Taj of Shahjahan’s time mentions Ketaki, Jai, Jui, Champa, Maulashree, Harshringar and Bel. All these are plants whose flowers or leaves are used in the worship of Hindu deities. Bel leaves are exclusively used in Lord Shiva’s worship. A graveyard is planted only with shady trees because the idea of using fruit and flower from plants in a cemetery is abhorrent to human conscience. The presence of Bel and other flower plants in the Taj garden is proof of its having been a Shiva temple before seizure by Shahjahan.

#8. The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb’s time. Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Also, The Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the Koran but nowhere is there even the slightest or the remotest allusion in that Islamic overwriting to Shahjahan’s authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder he would have said so in so many words before beginning to quote Koran.

#9. The cost of the Taj is nowhere recorded in Shahjahan’s court papers because Shahjahan could have never built the Taj Mahal. That is why wild estimates of the cost by gullible writers have ranged from 4 million to 91.7 million rupees.Twenty thousand laborers are supposed to have worked for 22 years during Shahjahan’s reign in building the Tajmahal. Had this been true, there should have been available in Shahjahan’s court papers design drawings, heaps of labor muster rolls, daily expenditure sheets, bills and receipts of material ordered, and commissioning orders. There is not even a scrap of paper of this kind.
#10. The second name, ‘Mahal’ is never Muslim because in none of the Muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as ‘Mahal’. Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal? Both its components namely, ‘Taj’ and’ Mahal’ are of Sanskrit origin.

 
LOL

10 Facts that suggests Taj Mahal was built on a Shiva Temple
by Aayush




An ivory-white marble mausoleum on the south bank of the Yamuna river in the Indian city of Agra where around 8 million people visit every year and at times there are over 50 thousand people visiting on a single day is non-other than one of the seven wonders of the world, The Taj Mahal. People all over the world famously identifies this beautiful piece of architecture as a sign of love. History tells us that it is so due to it being a tomb built by the Mughal emperor, Shah Jahan, to house the tomb of his favorite wife, Mumtaz. We are all aware of these facts that have been taught to us since our school days.
Taj-Mahal.jpg
Photo by Anubhav Vanamamalai on 500px.com

As a turn of events, India’s government has been dragged into a bizarre row over whether the Taj Mahal, widely seen as a masterpiece of Muslim architecture, should be converted into a Hindu temple. A legal case, first brought by six lawyers in Agra in April, claims that the monument famously built by a seventeenth-century Mughal emperor as a tomb for his beloved wife was originally an ancient shrine to the Hindu god Shiva. The petition, which was accepted by the Agra Court, it calls for ownership of the monument to be transferred to Hindus.

Here are some evidence that suggests that the claims could actually be true and suggests it to be a site of Hindu origin being a Shiva Temple.
Tejomahalaya.jpg
source
#1. Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient center of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night during the month of Shravan. However, during the last few centuries, the residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples, which are Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar, and Rajarajeshwar. Sadly, they had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently, the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Nagnatheshwar i.e., The Lord Great God of Agra, The Deity of the King of Cobras.

#2. The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats and their name for Shivaji is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28, 1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Linga. From this, it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej.

#3. The octagonal shape of the Taj Mahal has a special Hindu significance because Hindus alone have special names for the eight directions, and celestial guards assigned to them. The pinnacle points to the heaven while the foundation signifies to the netherworld. Hindu forts, cities, palaces, and temples generally have an octagonal layout or some octagonal features so that together with the pinnacle and the foundation they cover all the ten directions in which the king or God holds sway, according to Hindu belief. A central dome with octagonal cupolas at its four corners is a common feature of Hindu temples.
#4. The Taj Mahal has identical entrance arches on all four sides. This is a typical Hindu building style known as Chaturmukhi, i.e. four-faced. Chaturmukhi style is mainly seen in Jain temples in India and Hindu temples of Southeast Asia. Here, the size & scale of the central structure and its form/elevation is completely different from that of the Taj as can be seen in examples below. The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the Hindu style. They are used as lamp towers during the night and watch towers during the day. Such towers serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding altars and the altar set up for God Satyanarayan worship have pillars raised at the four corners. The Taj Mahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been an Islamic building it should have faced the west.

#5. The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the ‘Tej-Linga’ amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya. Also, Hindu temples are often built on river banks and sea beaches. The Taj is one such built on the bank of the Yamuna river an ideal location for a Shiva temple.
#6. A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory, has revealed that the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan, since the doors of the Taj, broken open by Muslim invaders repeatedly from the 11th century onwards, had to b replaced from time to time. The Taj edifice is much more older. It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e., almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan.
#7. Description of the gardens around the Taj of Shahjahan’s time mentions Ketaki, Jai, Jui, Champa, Maulashree, Harshringar and Bel. All these are plants whose flowers or leaves are used in the worship of Hindu deities. Bel leaves are exclusively used in Lord Shiva’s worship. A graveyard is planted only with shady trees because the idea of using fruit and flower from plants in a cemetery is abhorrent to human conscience. The presence of Bel and other flower plants in the Taj garden is proof of its having been a Shiva temple before seizure by Shahjahan.

#8. The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb’s time. Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Also, The Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the Koran but nowhere is there even the slightest or the remotest allusion in that Islamic overwriting to Shahjahan’s authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder he would have said so in so many words before beginning to quote Koran.

#9. The cost of the Taj is nowhere recorded in Shahjahan’s court papers because Shahjahan could have never built the Taj Mahal. That is why wild estimates of the cost by gullible writers have ranged from 4 million to 91.7 million rupees.Twenty thousand laborers are supposed to have worked for 22 years during Shahjahan’s reign in building the Tajmahal. Had this been true, there should have been available in Shahjahan’s court papers design drawings, heaps of labor muster rolls, daily expenditure sheets, bills and receipts of material ordered, and commissioning orders. There is not even a scrap of paper of this kind.
#10. The second name, ‘Mahal’ is never Muslim because in none of the Muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as ‘Mahal’. Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal? Both its components namely, ‘Taj’ and’ Mahal’ are of Sanskrit origin.

We don't care even if it was. It's called history. If you don't accept this architectural evolution, ask permission from UNESCO if you can tear it down because history hurts your feelings. Be sure to ask though, because we know you can't do it by yourselves.
 
We don't care even if it was. It's called history. If you don't accept this architectural evolution, ask permission from UNESCO if you can tear it down because history hurts your feelings. Be sure to ask though, because we know you can't do it by yourselves.
Hindus are big on circumstantial stuff and word salad... if these were presented as evidence in a court of law, it wouldn't have even entered trial proceedings... tossed out as hearsay and circumstantial!
But this is what they have been using since getting a majoritarian state frim Brits... rewriting everything on vedic and general hearsay.
 
Hindus are big on circumstantial stuff and word salad... if these were presented as evidence in a court of law, it wouldn't have even entered trial proceedings... tossed out as hearsay and circumstantial!
But this is what they have been using since getting a majoritarian state frim Brits... rewriting everything on vedic and general hearsay.
There's lots more word salad for those snowflakes to toss their way through..
"Hindus have successfully demanded a temple where the Babri Mosque once stood. However, the events of December 6, 1992 are a continuation of a medieval practice, which we thought we had left behind when we became independent. As it has been pointed out by many, in the medieval era, the destruction of one religious structure to build another was not unique to the Muslim rulers, recently dramatised as barbaric by the historians in Bollywood. Countless rulers of all faiths across the sub-continent have done the same. Hindu kings too destroyed Hindu temples, and more often than not, Jain and Buddhist sites as well.

If each religious group asked for their heritage to be reinstated, the Jains and the Buddhists may have a lot to ask of the Hindus — but they wouldn’t know whom to ask, given that the Hindus themselves never self-identified under this unified category, as has been pointed out by several scholars."

@SuvarnaTeja



" Dr. Jayaprakash: ‘The Hindu ruler Pushyamitra Sunga had destroyed 84,000 Buddhist stupas which were built by Emperor Ashoka. This was followed by the demolition of Buddhist centres in Magadha. Thousands of Buddhist saints were killed mercilessly. King Jalaluka destroyed the Buddha viharas within his jurisdiction on the ground that chanting of hymns by Buddhists disturbed his sleep! In Kashmir, King Kinnara demolished thousands of viharas and captured the Buddhist villages to please Brahmins. A large number of Buddha viharas were usurped by Brahmins and converted into Hindu temples where entry of ‘untouchables’ was prohibited. Notably, Buddhist places were regularized as Hindu temples by writing Puranas, which were invented myths or pseudo history. The important temples at Tirupathi, Aihole, Undavalli, Ellora, Bengal, Puri, Badarinath, Mathura, Ayodhya, Sringeri, Bodhigaya, Saranath, Delhi, Nalanda, Gudimallam, Nagarjunakonda, Srisailam and Sabarimala are some of the striking examples of Brahminical usurpation of Buddhist centres.’"


The peaceful brahminist religion and its adherents enjoy selective memory loss amongst other pleasures it would seem.
 
@SuvarnaTeja
This Shiva Temple called Taj Mahal looks very Islamic with minarets and whatnot, so maybe Lord Shiva was a circumcised man and you fellas have lost his true teachings. :)
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom