Yechury says yoga is 'dog's body movement', Twitter users lash out

[gau8av]

who is she ?? someone from aap ??

yup

some Atishi Marlena, and before you get any dirty thoughts about 'marlena', the mar here is for marxist and lena is from lenin.. her parents named her so

 

[jamahir]

yup

some Atishi Marlena, and before you get any dirty thoughts about 'marlena', the mar here is for marxist and lena is from lenin.. her parents named her so

i knew i had read about her.

well, she seems to have forsaken socialism, from what i read.

but if asked to choose from aap, i will take swara bhaskar and gul panag.

and before you get any dirty thoughts about 'marlena'

atishi "marlena"...

 

[Sky lord]

good question... and i ask you to consult this current thread ( Che Guevara!!! And China ), which is a discussion between me, a chinese member and a vietnamese... i should say your answer is there.



1. there was a third big power ( the germany-japan-italy axis ) hostile to both.

2. usa government wasn't as big a imperialist as it is now ( nato was formed in 1949, after end of ww2 ) and wasn't encroaching hugely on ussr region of influence.

p.s - russia was one of the republics in ussr.

So basically all that nonsense you just spouted about socialist countries never fighting with other socialist countries was just something you pulled out of your @ss. They indeed do so under the right circumstances and communist and capitalist countries also ally under the right circumstances, so maybe that is what Socialist Nehru was doing, allying with whosoever he felt pressured to go with.

 

[jamahir]

@gau8av

she - "hi... aa tishi marlena".

he - "yahaan ?? "

 

[livingdead]

the idea is to get every citizen to participate in the political running of society and have the whole system as decentralized semi-independent communes.

each neighborhood in a city calls its residents to a ground or hall and elects a secretariat... this is done with each resident participating and voicing opinion... the secretariat will then be responsible for maintainence of the neighborhood ( security, lighting etc ), for getting and discussing local needs with the city administration, for discussing local and societal issues with local residents and delivering opinions and decisions of local residents to city administration or higher... the local residents confer in a truly democratic manner, with disregard for age, gender, profession or other attributes... this gathering at neighborhood-level becomes called "basic people's congress".

if a city has ten neighborhoods, there will then be ten "basic people's congress" ( bpc ) gatherings with their own secretariats.

the secretariats of each bpc will gather to discuss local and city issues at city level... each secretariat will be delivering the opinions of their bpc's and the needs of their bpc's and how city resources can be allocated to each bpc in a clean manner... and to help make discussions smoother and to help get resources from higher level and to deliver the city's opinions to higher level, the gathered bpc secretariats will elect a secretariat for the city, and this secretariat can be from among them or from some neighborhood or any other person who is deemed suitable... the city-level gathering will become called "municipal people's congress" ( mpc ).

for easier administration of a larger society, some cities can be gathered together into a region and the city secretariats will gather in "regional people's congress" ( rpc )... this can avoided for a small-population society.

either the mpc or the rpc, the relevant secretariats gather at societal level in the "general people's congress" which takes decisions at societal level and to discuss world issues and how to participate in them... to help smoother discussions, the gather secretariats at this top level elect a "general secretariat"... the gathering becomes called "general people's congress" ( gpc )

in all this, each citizen's novel opinions are delivered from the bpc through a chain until it reaches the gpc, each decision by a bpc is delivered until it reaches the gpc... this makes each citizen of the society a politician and a decision maker and opiner... direct-democracy.

done within the guidance of socialism, this will yield and simplest and almost-perfect society... this entire system is called "jamahiriya" and if all societies human-wide are so changed, it will lead to "world jamahiriya"... this plus some more scientific changes will lead to true communism... a vision worth changing one's life for and working towards it.

i suggest you put a diagram for the bpc, mpc, rpc, gpc to understand them more easily.

for more ( The Green Book - I ).

"aam aadmi party" has a similar but smaller-scale idea in form of "swaraj".

@levina @Spring Onion ^^^

@hinduguy ( you may have seen this before ).

Direct democracy will not work in populous countries, besides you are assuming everybody wants to participate in it, thats a big thing to ask. Most people might not want the responsibility.
In socieites like India, its downright dangerous, it will descend to mobocracy, crude majority will crush minority. Khap panchayats will weild enermous power.

I quite like the fact that we can choose the people who are willing to work on behalf of us. By dividing them into two groups, and making sure its the interest of one group to oppose and expose other, we keep the balance.
It is quite genius, I dont like countries run by all party coalition or united council, you need effective opposition.

 

[Hindustani78]

yup

some Atishi Marlena, and before you get any dirty thoughts about 'marlena', the mar here is for marxist and lena is from lenin.. her parents named her so

ex Spokeperson of AAM AADMI Party

i knew i had read about her.

well, she seems to have forsaken socialism, from what i read.

but if asked to choose from aap, i will take swara bhaskar and gul panag.





atishi "marlena"...

Gul Panag hasnt won elections on AAP ticket

 

[The Huskar]

ussr was technically founded in 1922 and dissolved in 1991... about 68 years... the same duration as the indian republic's existence... ussr was military superpower, a human space flight power, a technological innovator, a great influence upon human history, helper of development in other nations... and india ??

Let me also present a simple counter argument.
Birth of USSR and India may have been due to ebullition of revolutionary propositions but the problems both these regimes faced since its birth day were disparate.

1.USSR never had to deal with an nation who had missed the era of industrial revolution.It never had a over abundance of human capital with little to negligible practical sophistication.It was a nation improvised by the lavishness of its Czar and his nobles.

2.World War 2 was the war that gave birth to defence infrastructure in the European,American and East Asian nations.It is regarded the the primary stimulus that led to many innovation in the different sectors of human needs.Be it Gillette safety razor or synthetic fuel,the military innovations of World War 2 had metamorphosed to civilian items of daily comfort.India had missed that congruence of avant-garde scientific supernova and ,in my opinion, lost a great chance of scientific prevalence among Indian population.USSR did fairly well in this era if I remember my history correctly.

3.Nehru,even before his advent as the Prime Minister of independent India,was a mother lode of bad ideas.His style of governance was impractical for a nation that had such a bone breaking poverty.He,instead of making the population able in various spheres of excellence,made them a parasite to the nation by implementing such a moronic subsidiary system.His idea of centralising all major industries,in an pathetic attempt of copying USSR, and its continuation by subsequent PM's had severely backfired and almost led to India's bankruptcy in 1991.

4.The quota system,in my opinion,is the Kohinoor diamond that sits atop the crown of sludge that is the Indian democracy.Instead of helping the poor,regardless of his birth affiliations,made a system so exploitable that it may in future have a ripping effect in the fabric of this democracy.USSR never had to deal with a system that rewards the unworthy due to his accident of birth,did it??

So tell me,inspite of having such a diverse range of complication,India is still standing on its feet,whereas USSR is now lost in the epoch of history.What does that tell you about Communism and Democracy.

BTW.China is not a real communist country.It is more like a one party monarchy with capitalistic flavors.

 

[jamahir]

ex Spokeperson of AAM AADMI Party

but still in aap ??

Gul Panag hasnt won elections on AAP ticket

i don't really know what is her position in the party or that of swara bhaskar.

good picture.

 

[Sky lord]

Let me also present a simple counter argument.
Birth of USSR and India may have been due to ebullition of revolutionary propositions but the problems both these regimes faced since its birth day were disparate.

1.USSR never had to deal with an nation who had missed the era of industrial revolution.It never had a over abundance of human capital with little to negligible practical sophistication.It was a nation improvised my the lavishness of its Czar and his nobles.

2.World War 2 was the war that gave birth to defence infrastructure in the European,American and East Asian nations.It is regarded the the primary stimulus that led to many innovation in the different sectors of human needs.Be it Gillette safety razor or synthetic fuel,the military innovations of World War 2 had metamorphosed to civilian items of daily comfort.India had missed that congruence of avant-garde scientific supernova and ,in my opinion, lost a great chance of scientific prevalence among Indian population.USSR did fairly well in this era if I remember my history correctly.

3.Nehru,even before his advent as the Prime Minister of independent India,was a mother lode of bad ideas.His style of governance was impractical for a nation that had such a bone breaking poverty.He,instead of making the population able in various spheres of excellence,made them a parasite to the nation by implementing such a moronic subsidiary system.His idea of centralising all major industries,in an pathetic attempt of copying USSR, and its continuation by subsequent PM's had severely backfired and almost led to India's bankruptcy in 1991.

4.The quota system,in my opinion,is the Kohinoor diamond that sits atop the crown of sludge that is the Indian democracy.Instead of helping the poor,regardless of his birth affiliations,made a system so exploitable that it may in future have a ripping effect in the fabric of this democracy.USSR never had to deal with a system that rewards the unworthy due to his accident of birth,did it??

So tell me,inspite of having such a diverse range of complication,India is still standing on its feet,whereas USSR is now lost in the epoch of history.What does that tell you about Communism and Democracy.

BTW.China is not a real communist country.It is more like a one party monarchy with capitalistic flavors.

Beautifully explained.

I think we need look no further than west and east Germany, one country divided in two, so the same culture, resources, people - only difference was in the political and economic system . West Germany after WW2 became a prosperous place while the East struggled - one was soft capitalist (sort of) and the other was communist.

 

[The Huskar]

Beautifully explained.

I think we need look no further than west and east Germany, one country divided in two, so the same culture, resources, people - only difference was in the political and economic system . West Germany after WW2 became a prosperous place while the East struggled - one was soft capitalist (sort of) and the other was communist.

Indeed.
Communism never works unless you have a technocratic system in place.Even then,overtime too many sacrifices for greater good leads to too much anger among the populace.Who knows how many skeletons is the CCP hiding in its closet.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

celebrating yoga day and knowing nothing about yoga by majority Indians indeed a shame you should be ashamed of.

Go back read my posts i already explained why this statement is not wrong.

and yes at least i know better than many here



and a hindu low life always hide behind a Muslim name on PDF

1. We Indians 'worship stones'. How do you expect us to have shame?
2. Hindus are always 'low life' s. What's so surprising there either? Didn't you read in your textbooks?

Everybody loves doggy pose.

Yeah but the humans patented it. So not sure if the dogs do. Anymore.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Yeah but the humans patented it. So not sure if the dogs do. Anymore.

Yup, dogs love bitches eternally. In case of humans, stay in a relation for more than 2 years, doggy pose is all you can bear.