Yasin Malik detained at Srinagar airport, 'escorted to his home'

[illusion8]

British India ))))

Under the occupation of Brit Kingdom.

The passport had to be issued by the occupier just like in case of Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

It does not and did not make Kashmiris as Indians.



Sir the BRITISH INDIAN EMPIRE.

and the word Indian was more of a contemporary use )

you know it as well.

Just because a Pakistani wants it - doesn't mean that India is going to change its passport for its people of different states. and your posts doesn't make sense - specially about the British passport and the passport clearly mentioning "Indian Empire"

 

[third eye]

British India ))))

Under the occupation of Brit Kingdom.

The passport had to be issued by the occupier just like in case of Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

It does not and did not make Kashmiris as Indians.

Notice the difference . The Brits gave us a 'British Indian Passport' not a British Passport.

The passport issued to Yasin Malik is an Indian Passport not an Indian Kashmiri Passport.

The implications are for us all to see.

 

[Spring Onion]

Yes I do know it. but one cannot compare the passports of Pre and Post Interdependent India, as the British never saw us as Brits. Mr. Yasin Carries an Indian Passport and lives in India , which is enough for him to be called an Indian.

Sir one can compare that.

The Kashmiris traveling on passport issued by occupier India is very much a compulsion once people of sub-continent had who had to agree to British passport issued by occupier Kingdom because one can not just block openings for study, trade, political gains, religious traveling by refusing the passport.

Kashmiris have to play smart and find all possible openings and carry their just demand for independence through all possible means.

Just because a Pakistani wants it - doesn't mean that India is going to change its passport for its people of different states. and your posts doesn't make sense - specially about the British passport and the passport clearly mentioning "Indian Empire"

nobody is asking you to change your passport.

the reality is passport issuing does not make Kashmiris Indians.

and as for the british passport i already replied to that.

it was BRTISH INDIA )) means territory under occupation of Britain.
Further Means the passport did NOT represent Independent India but British occupied India. Just like Indian passport for Kashmiris does not represent Kashmiris but occupied govt of India.

 

[SURYA-1]

Sir one can compare that.

The Kashmiris traveling on passport issued by occupier India is very much a compulsion once people of sub-continent had who had to agree to British passport issued by occupier Kingdom because one can not just block openings for study, trade, political gains, religious traveling by refusing the passport.

Kashmiris have to play smart and find all possible openings and carry their just demand for independence through all possible means.



nobody is asking you to change your passport.

the reality is passport issuing does not make Kashmiris Indians.

and as for the british passport i already replied to that.

it was BRTISH INDIA )) means territory under occupation of Britain.
Further Means the passport did NOT represent Independent India but British occupied India. Just like Indian passport for Kashmiris does not represent Kashmiris but occupied govt of India.

Why don't you ask your government then to lead by example and librate oppressed Kashmiries first, then may be in decade or two we would think on those lines.

Paranoid Pakistanis shedding crocodile tears for lost cause.We all knew how do you feel for Kashmiries during earthquake.Your army was exposed by international media.

 

[IndianArmy]

Sir one can compare that.

The Kashmiris traveling on passport issued by occupier India is very much a compulsion once people of sub-continent had who had to agree to British passport issued by occupier Kingdom because one can not just block openings for study, trade, political gains, religious traveling by refusing the passport.

Kashmiris have to play smart and find all possible openings and carry their just demand for independence through all possible means.

Except Pakistan, I dont think there is any second nation which considers us occupiers. We did not snatch a free land for us to be called occupiers. The frustrations of a few cannot give birth to a nation.

There is no compulsion for them to travel on Indian passports. You can Invite those who are not willing to be a part of us and grant your citizenship to them.

The real issue is, it is not the Kashmiris who are playing in Kashmir but Pakistan.

If Kashmiris were really un-happy with us, wouldn't it have resulted in another Bangladesh?

 

[bronxbull]

As a Kashmiri he can go wherever he damn well pleases.

Indian have no say here; they are just scared and uneasy about Pakistani contact with Kashmiri counterparts/citizenry

he has to be alive to do all that

 

[illusion8]

Sir one can compare that.

The Kashmiris traveling on passport issued by occupier India is very much a compulsion once people of sub-continent had who had to agree to British passport issued by occupier Kingdom because one can not just block openings for study, trade, political gains, religious traveling by refusing the passport.

Kashmiris have to play smart and find all possible openings and carry their just demand for independence through all possible means.



nobody is asking you to change your passport.

the reality is passport issuing does not make Kashmiris Indians.

and as for the british passport i already replied to that.

it was BRTISH INDIA )) means territory under occupation of Britain.
Further Means the passport did NOT represent Independent India but British occupied India. Just like Indian passport for Kashmiris does not represent Kashmiris but occupied govt of India.

Who cares what they think?? he applied for the Indian passport, you can issue him a Pakistani passport if you want.

As for your analogy of Pre and Post Independence India - that's just stupid.

 

[jayron]

by looking at the rape speed in India half of India must have been in Tihar jail.

How did India treat you when you visited?

Looks like you can get away with what every f1lth you spout.

 

[Bombaywalla]

^^ you guys are wasting your time responding to half baked imbeciles.

 

[bangbros]

He should have been Escorted to Thiar Jail...:

if i was there i would have escorted him to hell..

 

[SURYA-1]

if i was there i would have escorted him to hell..

He won't go to hell ,he is destined for 72,000 virgins. If you know what I mean.

 

[SURYA-1]

Indian modes operandi. Usually mass graves (children, men, women)

How can you expect us to mark the disowned ones .

 

[Arav_Rana]

6 feet space 6 feet below ground level is more secure. Isn't it?

Bad idea.
Why waste land for traitors and terrorists ?
Just throw in furnace.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

You can't compare ttp to these guys

Be realistic yaara. Things have been reasonably quiet in Kashmir. Issues exists and can't be wished away but violence is down.

And no, not because of AFSPA

Except Pakistan, I dont think there is any second nation which considers us occupiers. We did not snatch a free land for us to be called occupiers. The frustrations of a few cannot give birth to a nation.

There is no compulsion for them to travel on Indian passports. You can Invite those who are not willing to be a part of us and grant your citizenship to them.

The real issue is, it is not the Kashmiris who are playing in Kashmir but Pakistan.

If Kashmiris were really un-happy with us, wouldn't it have resulted in another Bangladesh?

The potential is always there actually. All it would need is a spark.

It took years of mismanagement from the center, election fraud and foreign meddling and arming of rebels - and it eventually bore some fruit no?

 

[Spring Onion]

Except Pakistan, I dont think there is any second nation which considers us occupiers. We did not snatch a free land for us to be called occupiers. The frustrations of a few cannot give birth to a nation.

emotionalism )) ehh. the land is disputed according to INTERNATIONAL LAW and still on UN lists as so. Its another matter that big powers yet to take it up. Which they will one day when they find a suitable moment.

There is no compulsion for them to travel on Indian passports. You can Invite those who are not willing to be a part of us and grant your citizenship to them.

Kashmiris dont need anybody's citizenship. They have their own country called Kashmir currently occupied by India.

The real issue is, it is not the Kashmiris who are playing in Kashmir but Pakistan.

If Kashmiris were really un-happy with us, wouldn't it have resulted in another Bangladesh?

Thats why India is forced to impose curfew every day in occupied Kashmir and thats why India needs thousands of occupier forces there.

And oh by the way thats why we had seen even women coming out against Indian atrocities there