What's new

Xinjiang Province: News & Discussions

. . . .
But Tibetans do not accept China as their own country. Historically Tibet was never a part of China nor Tibet integrated with china willfully.

Why don't you look up the Qing empire and get back to me on whether Tibet was "historically" a part of China or not?
 
Last edited:
. . .
because this is a fact.




It is fault of wrong history taught to you by CCP.

Chinese have held Tibet way longer than we've held any of the north eastern states. The Yuan dynasty had it. Ming lost it and Qing got it back. Where are you learning your history from?? Tibetians don't like it? Fair enough. But somehow relating them to India really is a bridge too far
 
Last edited:
.
Beautiful and amazing pictures. One of best place. planing to drive from Gilgit to Kashgar and fly from their to Shanghai.
Thanks for uploading. Plz do more if you can..
 
. . .
Chinese have held Tibet way longer than we've held any of the north eastern states. The Yuan dynasty had it. Ming lost it and Qing got it back. Where are you learning your history from?? Tibetians don't like it? Fair enough. But somehow relating them to India really is a bridge too far
there is no country named india. Just a bunch of British conolies integration
 
.
But Tibetans do not accept China as their own country. Historically Tibet was never a part of China nor Tibet integrated with china willfully.
Being a senior member these trolls aren't cool,its their part and we don't have any right to comment on its sovereignty.
 
. .
there is no country named india. Just a bunch of British conolies integration
This is fair enough after the comments from Indian members but let me tell you mate Indian history dates 4000 b.c. The time of ramayana.There was no country named India but an unified landmass known as Hindustan was always there which is called India presently. :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom