What's new

Xi Says China Will Continue Efforts to Assimilate Muslims

Reading the story in detail, one can clearly see the title is an injection by the author that's completely fabricated. It is akin to having a title "Bush says US will eradicate all Muslims" when he declared war on terror. The tactics these people use are getting more and more pathetic and desperate.

Is the UN finding that you have subjugated millions of Muslims to reeducation and assimilation camp also fabricated? Your comment assumes that this article is somehow in some silo and the ten's of findings by credible investigations around this same attitude and behavior exhibited by Xi is non- existent

 
.
Is the UN finding that you have subjugated millions of Muslims to reeducation and assimilation camp also fabricated? Your comment assumes that this article is somehow in some silo and the ten's of findings by credible investigations around this same attitude and behavior exhibited by Xi is non- existent


Ah, another creative title as the statement is not by UN human rights council, its high commissioner or even its spokesmen, but a panel member which are basically hired consultants, who in turn cites an unsourced estimate with no investigation or verification. This is how twisted the media has become, thanks to gullible readers who doesn't even spend time reading the actual article, but rather just the title.

Now, this is an actual UNHRC finding. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/PK/KashmirUpdateReport_8July2019.pdf
 
Last edited:
.
View attachment 675576


Chinese leader Xi Jinping declared success in his approach to governing the region of Xinjiang, signaling no letup in the Communist Party’s forceful campaign to assimilate millions of ethnic Muslims on the country’s northwestern frontier.

“Practice has proven that the party’s strategy for governing Xinjiang in the new era is completely correct,” and it must continue for the long term, Mr. Xi said at a two-day party conference on Xinjiang policy that concluded Saturday, according to a state media report.

Addressing a Beijing gathering of officials from the party leadership, central government and Xinjiang, among others, Mr. Xi also ordered the entire Communist Party to consider it a political mission to implement the Xinjiang strategy, which he said brought the region closer toward long-term peace and stability.
Managing Xinjiang affairs well “is a major task for the entire party and the entire nation,” and one that requires strengthening the party’s “unified leadership” across the country, Mr. Xi said.


These remarks marked Mr. Xi’s most full-throated public endorsement of the high-pressure campaign Beijing has waged to stamp out separatist sentiment in Xinjiang—an effort that has encompassed mass detentions and forced-assimilation of ethnic Muslims over recent years, and stirred international backlash over allegations of widespread human-rights abuses.


This week’s conference was the party’s first major conclave on Xinjiang policy since 2014. It is expected to chart Beijing’s agenda in the region for the next five years or so. The meeting wasn’t announced ahead of time.

The Communist Party has long struggled to manage Xinjiang, a mountainous frontier abutting Central Asia where about 12 million Turkic-speaking Muslim Uighurs live. Separatist sentiment among Uighurs has simmered there for decades, occasionally flaring into deadly attacks against symbols of Beijing’s authority and the country’s Han Chinese majority.


The party’s previous Xinjiang policy conclave took place amid a spate of deadly attacks that were attributed to Uighur separatists. Among them was a bomb-and-knife attack in April 2014 that rocked Xinjiang’s capital of Urumqi shortly after Mr. Xi concluded a tour of the region. A bomb attack at a Urumqi street market the following month killed at least 31 people, just days before that year’s Xinjiang policy conclave.

At the May 2014 conference, Mr. Xi demanded an all-out effort to quash separatism and terrorist activities in Xinjiang, and his administration has since adopted increasingly hard-line measures to stamp out resistance to Communist rule in the region.

These efforts have intensified dramatically since 2017, as local authorities rolled out the use of blanket digital surveillance, mass-internment camps and political-indoctrination programs to rein in the Uighur population. Officials have also targeted Uighur culture, demolishing neighborhoods and tearing down mosques and other religious sites.

Human-rights advocates and Western governments have denounced these methods, while United Nations officials have voiced concern and sought access to Xinjiang to carry out fact-finding visits. Chinese officials have denied committing any rights abuses, while portraying their policies in Xinjiang as a benign effort to help Uighurs improve their lives. They have also declared success in restoring stability to the region, saying no cases of violent terrorism have taken place there for more than three years.


This week, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute published a pair of research reports—based largely on satellite imagery—alleging that Chinese authorities have razed or damaged two-thirds of the mosques in Xinjiang and continued to expand mass-detention camps for Uighurs over the last past year.

China’s Foreign Ministry rejected those claims as smears. Chinese officials have previously accused ASPI, which is partly funded by the Australian and U.S. governments, of concocting research on China—an allegation that ASPI researchers have denied.

In his conference speech, Mr. Xi made no reference to these programs or his 2014 demands for eradicating separatism and terrorism in Xinjiang. Instead, he listed what he described as major policy achievements since 2014, including economic and social development, rising incomes and reduced poverty rates.

Mr. Xi said Xinjiang’s gross domestic product grew by an annual average of about 7.2% from 2014 to 2019, reaching the equivalent of about $200 billion at current rates, while more than 2.9 million residents were assessed to have “escaped poverty” over the same period.

“On the whole, Xinjiang is presenting a favorable situation of social stability and people living and working in peace,” Mr. Xi said. “The facts provide ample proof that our country is successful in its ethnic policy.”

In an apparent response to international criticism of Beijing’s Xinjiang policy, Mr. Xi demanded comprehensive efforts to “tell Xinjiang’s stories well,” and to publicize the region’s development successes “with the courage of our convictions.”

Mr. Xi also called for greater efforts to strengthen a sense of Chinese national identity in Xinjiang, such as through research and educational programs that inculcate correct attitudes on history, culture and religion. Efforts to “sinicize” Islam—infusing pro-party ideas into religious practices—must also continue, he said.

The goal, according to Mr. Xi, is to ensure the “common consciousness of the Chinese nation takes root deep inside people’s hearts.”

Write to Chun Han Wong at chunhan.wong@wsj.com


This is completely crazy, how can you command love and loyalty by force. The Soviets and Russians couldn't assimilate ethnic identies after a century of rule, each country quickly rediscovered their identity as soon as they found space.
Enforcement is never indefinite, better to encourage them to be proud Chinese citizens, then use such tactics.
 
.
This is completely crazy, how can you command love and loyalty by force. The Soviets and Russians couldn't assimilate ethnic identies after a century of rule, each country quickly rediscovered their identity as soon as they found space.
Enforcement is never indefinite, better to encourage them to be proud Chinese citizens, then use such tactics.

Yes, it's crazy simply because it is but another hit piece that's far removed from reality.
 
.
Ah, another creative title as the statement is not by UN human rights council, its high commissioner or even its spokesmen, but a panel member which are basically hired consultants, who in turn cites an unsourced estimate with no investigation or verification. This is how twisted the media has become, thanks to gullible readers who doesn't even spend time reading the actual article, but rather just the title.

Now, this is an actual UNHRC finding. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/PK/KashmirUpdateReport_8July2019.pdf

So a multitude of countries, investigations are all lying. The credibility only lies with CCP, Global Times. Got it.


 
.
So a multitude of countries, investigations are all lying. The credibility only lies with CCP, Global Times. Got it.



Read the articles. None of them has any actual investigation or finding, just political posturing.
 
.
Read the articles. None of them has any actual investigation or finding, just political posturing.
many do talk about actual findings, but then you call it all a hoax. You think your narrative is working and you are getting more buyers of 'nothing here to see'?
 
.
many do talk about actual findings, but then you call it all a hoax. You think your narrative is working and you are getting more buyers of 'nothing here to see'?

What actual finding? Have any of these people even been to Xinjiang? The article you linked provided no finding, only claims. You can't tell the difference between the two?
 
.
Xinjiang in 2016: Weekly violence and attacks
Xinjiang in 2020: Not a single attack in three years, GDP increased, employment increased, literacy rate increased, poverty level dropped

Whatever Beijing is doing, it's working wonderfully. If our enemies cry about it, we should do it even more.

As far as this debunked "genocide" theory, Xinjiang had 3.6 million Uyghurs in 1954. In 2018, the number of Uyghurs was at 12 million, increasing four fold in 60 years. Uyghurs are the fastest growing group in China. Why don't you take your stupid somewhere else.

Mao almost eradicated separatism and religious extremism, and it's one of the only few things I liked about him. That prick Hu Yaobang brought it back in the 1980's. I would spit on that guy's grave.
 
.
What actual finding? Have any of these people even been to Xinjiang? The article you linked provided no finding, only claims. You can't tell the difference between the two?
There are tens of articles in the Uyghur thread of proof that had to be smuggled out because you don't allow a real visit of all facilities, just pre-determined ones you guide with a group of picked players. But it does not matter, you think 22 countries, UN groups, everyone is lying. Credibility is only coming from the CCP+ GlobalTimes. :rolleyes1:

https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/25/chinas-weak-excuse-block-investigations-xinjiang








 
.
Xi in my honest opinion is not really good at foreign policy nor sees the picture of the future. I have no idea why he will pursue such unnecessary political move for his regime cause this will definitely come and hurt him in the most important stage of them all.

The Americans fully know that WW3 in the distant future against China is unavoidable and China is losing the Muslim support in the whole world and in such war it's not hard to imagine who the muslims will support and which ever side they make alliagance with will win that war. A Western-Muslim Alliance will overcome china but Xi doesn't see it this way as of yet. If you ask any muslim who will you side with they will say the lesser evil in such scenario because despite disagreements with the US they don't have this retarded foreign policy or local policy. This will be the downfall of China in a potential WW3.

The Uighur people are an significiant amount inside china and they pose no threat to china whatsoever as they number less then 9mio that is a very very very insignficiant minority that shouldn't even be talked about let alone giving them all this coverage. This could very well be where China has lost WW3 before it even began and this could come and hurt them really bad by pursuing a very unnecessary and irrelevant political move that will cloud her future in the long run and it may not be visible to china currently but it will become visible one day if they don't change course because it is inevitable. Sometimes you gather unintentional future haters by simply pursuing a reckless and a pointless policy that seems to anger awole lot of people unnecessarily and if this was necessary for china I would have understood it but to be honest 9m is insignficiant minority on epic porportions


Are you foolish or are you fooling others? China is preparing to be totally isolated even it's not going to happen.
 
. . .
There are tens of articles in the Uyghur thread of proof that had to be smuggled out because you don't allow a real visit of all facilities, just pre-determined ones you guide with a group of picked players. But it does not matter, you think 22 countries, UN groups, everyone is lying. Credibility is only coming from the CCP+ GlobalTimes. :rolleyes1:

https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/25/chinas-weak-excuse-block-investigations-xinjiang









You don't see how ridiculous it is to call the prison system concentration camps and try to link these with the vocational training facilities? You mean Xinjiang does not have and should not have prisons? What do you expect from any prison?
 
.
You don't see how ridiculous it is to call the prison system concentration camps and try to link these with the vocational training facilities? You mean Xinjiang does not have and should not have prisons? What do you expect from any prison?
Yeah, that must be it. Got 22 countries, UN human rights groups, and all the other investigators all fooled.

Some more vocational training resorts
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom