Xi Jinping reshuffles, scolds PLA brass amid stand-off with India

[Indischer]

No certification required, the result is there for all to see, how wild Indian media is. It's also been pointed out by some Indian members here. If there were better regulation, such article wouldn't have been published.

Debunking a fabricated article is not self-aggrandization.

What result is there for all to see? That the Chinese media does not faithfully report many many events and occurrences to it's own people?

You didn't just 'debunk' the article, did you? You went into a tirade against the Indian media from the high horse POV of your media, which is really more of a donkey. I'd prefer a wild media any day over your 'tamed' one. But that's just my choice. I don't go about bandying your media for what it truly is....a toothless state mouthpiece. So it really is not up to you to certify any other Nation's media as it is for me to certify yours.

 

[Fattyacids]

What result is there for all to see? That the Chinese media does not faithfully report many many events and occurrences to it's own people?

You didn't just 'debunk' the article, did you? You went into a tirade against the Indian media from the high horse POV of your media, which is really more of a donkey. I'd prefer a wild media any day over your 'tamed' one. But that's just my choice. I don't go about bandying your media for what it truly is....a toothless state mouthpiece. So it really is not up to you to certify any other Nation's media as it is for me to certify yours.

You're free to read Chinese media and see if they fabricate news like Indian media do.

Yes, I debunked it. I posted the exact Xinhua article that TOI quoted.

Debunking a falsified report is not tantamount to a tirade. Your personal attack is closer to one.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

wow.. Just because I talk about Indians in the wild west show automatically make me a Chinese. You need to learn about American culture and that we have our own Indians as well. In fact, the term "Indians" was created by westerners for both Asian Indian and American Indians.

Interesting that you understand layman hindi ...... so a pakistani then ?

 

[Indischer]

You're free to read Chinese media and see if they fabricate news like Indian media do.

Yes, I debunked it. I posted the exact Xinhua article that TOI quoted.

Debunking a falsified report is not tantamount to a tirade. Your personal attack is closer to one.

How would you know what Xinhua posts are not fabricated?

Debunking an article is obviously not a tirade, but when you blame the entire media, it does become one. And what personal attack are you talking about? I don't recall using any expletives to either define or address you.

 

[Fattyacids]

How would you know what Xinhua posts are not fabricated?

Debunking an article is obviously not a tirade, but when you blame the entire media, it does become one. And what personal attack are you talking about? I don't recall using any expletives to either define or address you.

Straw-men logic. Xinhua is the source that TOI quoted. To debunk TOI lie, all that's needed is to show the source article. Whether Xinhua is credible or not, is irrelevant to the fact that TOI fabricated the article.
(One can simply cross-reference Xinhua with others from mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan)

This is why you can never have a rational argument with many Indians here. It was Janon who brought in the entire indian vs Chinese media into discussion. Don't I have a right to reply? I do. Hence, your accusation of me going into a tirade riding on a donkey qualify as personal attack.

 

[Indischer]

Straw-men logic. Xinhua is the source that TOI quoted. To debunk TOI lie, all that's needed is to show the source article. Whether Xinhua is credible or not, is irrelevant to the fact that TOI fabricated the article.
(One can simply cross-reference Xinhua with others from mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan)

This is why you can never have a rational argument with many Indians here. That long post was a reply to Janon who started bringing in indian vs Chinese media. Don't I have a right to reply? I do. Hence, your accusation of me going into a tirade riding on a donkey qualified as a personal attack.

You're again ignoring the fact that I have no problems against you debunking an article, but only against you painting the entire Indian media yellow while simultaneously attempting to somehow portray Chinese media as any better. Were you selectively debunking that article alone? You weren't. So how are you any better than any Indian?

 

[Abingdonboy]

So another rogue army on India's borders......

 

[Fattyacids]

You're again ignoring the fact that I have no problems against you debunking an article, but only against you painting the entire Indian media yellow while simultaneously attempting to somehow portray Chinese media as any better. Were you selectively debunking that article alone? You weren't. So how are you any better than any Indian?

Do you have comprehension problem? It was Janon who started indian vs Chinese media. I have every right to reply. Anyone with half a brain can compare the both media and make a non-bias judgement for himself, even Indian members commented how wild and unregulated Indian media can be. If you can't accept it, that's your personal problem. Deal with it!

 

[unbiasedopinion]

Integrity of journalism meaning fair and accurate reporting, which your so called, free media, failed to deliver.
Reading between the lines are meant for books and comprehension test.
If you're too daft to understand the difference, let me remind you PLA are still camping in Ladakh!!

Sooner they will retreat. For your information, looks like your government either deliberate creates conducive environment to have anti-china alliance or stupid enough not to understand the action of its army and its repercussion.

One side your state media says India follows Independent policy where as on another hand pushed India to other camp by having aggressive moves. When something unfavorable going to happen then you will cry and shout. Too much of kiddish behaviour.

 

[Indischer]

Do you have comprehension problem? It was Janon who started indian vs Chinese media. I have every right to reply. Anyone with half a brain can compare the both media and make a non-bias judgement for himself, even Indian members commented how wild and unregulated Indian media can be. If you can't accept it, that's your personal problem. Deal with it!

This, below, is from your very first comment on this thread, way before Janon made any sort of comparison. Seems like you also have the habit of forgetting what you write.

Indian media penchant to fabricate and distort facts is truly astounding, no different from some PDF Indians. The re-shuffling and anti-corruption drive is not related to the border standoff. Neither was PLA general scolded. Here is the original report from Xinhua as quoted by TOI. Compare the two. Typical Indian lie!!

Who is it that painted the entire Indian media (and most Indians too) as liars? You could've said the report is false, but you didn't stop there. Hence, my advice to you to get off that donkey still stands. Obviously, I'm not telling every Chinese man to do that!

 

[Fattyacids]

This, below, is from your very first comment on this thread, way before Janon made any sort of comparison. Seems like you also have the habit of forgetting what you write.

Indian media penchant to fabricate and distort facts is truly astounding, no different from some PDF Indians. The re-shuffling and anti-corruption drive is not related to the border standoff. Neither was PLA general scolded. Here is the original report from Xinhua as quoted by TOI. Compare the two. Typical Indian lie!!

Who is it that painted the entire Indian media (and most Indians too) as liars? You could've said the report is false, but you didn't stop there. Hence, my advice to you to get off that donkey still stands. Obviously, I'm not telling every Chinese man to do that!

What a desperate attempt. You're doing exactly what TOI was doing, cherry picked words and quote out of context to make a case. When one is thin on reasoning, this is expected.
Listen, the crux of my post was to debunk TOI with the source from Xinhua. Intuitively, anyone with a decent IQ knows those words refer to TOI. Is TOI not Indian? Is TOI not Indian media?

Point no 2. My dressing down on entire Indian media came only after Janon's, post 59. That was one that ruffled you. Which prompted you to quote from that post:

"And WHO exactly certifies this regulatory body as 'good'?

You have done zilch that others haven't already done. So better stop your self-aggrandization.""

If you were truly ruffled by my 1st post, you would've raised it earlier. Why wait and quote content from my later post???

This is a perfect example why one can't never have a honest and rational discussion with many PDF indians.

 

[Indischer]

What a desperate attempt. You're doing exactly what TOI was doing, cherry picked words and quote out of context to make a case. When one loses an argument, that's what he resort to.
Listen, the crux of my post was to debunk TOI article with the source from Xinhua. Intuitively, anyone with a decent IQ knows those words refer to TOI. Is TOI not Indian? Is TOI not Indian media?

Second, my dressing down on entire Indian media came only after Janon's, post 59. That was one that ruffled you. Which prompted you to quote from that post of mine:



If you truly ruffled by my 1st post, you've raised it earlier. Why quote content from my other post???
This is a perfect example why one can't never have a honest and rational discussion with many PDF indians.

How pathetic can you get man? That quote is from post # 14 on this thread, not 59 or whatever the heck you're referring to. Read what you've written in post 14 before constructing baloney around it.

And besides, where did you get this notion TOI = Indian media? TOI is a small and specific subset of Indian media, not it's entirety, as you so eloquently have tried to prove. If TOI is wrong, it alone needs to be plonked, not the entire Indian media. Perhaps you're conditioned to believe that Xinhua = Chinese media and decided to apply the same rule to India?

Indian media penchant to fabricate and distort facts is truly astounding, no different from some PDF Indians. The re-shuffling and anti-corruption drive is not related to the border standoff. Neither was PLA general scolded. Here is the original report from Xinhua as quoted by TOI. Compare the two. Typical Indian lie!!


Xi stresses military headquarters' loyalty to Party - Xinhua | English.news.cn
BEIJING, Sept. 22 (Xinhua) -- President Xi Jinping stressed the loyalty of headquarters of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) at a meeting with PLA chiefs of staff here on Monday.

Headquarters of PLA forces must have absolute loyalty and firm faith in the Communist Party of China, guarantee a smooth chain of command and make sure all decisions from the central leadership are fully implemented, said Xi, also chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC).

Headquarters of all PLA forces should improve their combat readiness and sharpen their ability to win a regional war in the age of information technology, he said.

The PLA chiefs of staff met in Beijing on Sunday, discussing how to improve the efficiency of military command under new circumstances. Fang Fenghui, chief of the PLA general staff, attended the meeting.

Military commanders should have a better understanding of international and domestic security situations as well as the latest military development, Xi said.

They should also strictly discipline themselves and the armies as well as contribute to the reform of national defense, he added.

At Sunday's meeting, PLA chiefs of staff focused on streamlining the operational headquarters of all PLA forces with information technology and revised several important protocols, according to a statement issued afterwards.

All PLA forces should follow the instructions of President Xi and update their operations to meet new goals and missions set by the CMC, the statement said.

This is the 14th post on this thread. I don't see Janon anywhere before this made an appearance.

 

[Fattyacids]

How pathetic can you get man? That quote is from post # 14 on this thread, not 59 or whatever the heck you're referring to. Read what you've written in post 14 before constructing baloney around it.

And besides, where did you get this notion TOI = Indian media? TOI is a small and specific subset of Indian media, not it's entirety, as you so eloquently have tried to prove. If TOI is wrong, it alone needs to be plonked, not the entire Indian media. Perhaps you're conditioned to believe that Xinhua = Chinese media and decided to apply the same rule to India?

Exercise some honesty. Post 14 was my very first post, the one with Xinhua article in it, the one which you cherry picked the words and took them out of context.

As I said, if you were truly ruffled by my 1st post, why didn't you raise it earlier? Instead you quoted content from my later post. No. 59, the one where I truly addressed the entire Indian media. It came after Janon's.

So spare me your dumb rhetoric. You don't need to specific down to the last decimal. In the context of my post, anyone with a decent IQ knows I'm addressing TOI. TOI is Indian, and TOI is part of Indian median. Your lie is busted. You can join TOI.
Playing around with words don't win you argument.

 

[Indischer]

Exercise some honesty. Post 14 was my very first post, the one with Xinhua article in it, the one which you cherry picked the words.

As I said, if you were truly ruffled by my 1st post, why didn't you raise it earlier? Instead you quoted content from my later post--the one where I truly addressed the entire Indian media.

Spare me your dumb rhetoric. You don't need to specific down to the last decimal. In the context of my post, anyone with a decent IQ knows I'm addressing TOI. TOI is Indian, and TOI is part of Indian median. Playing around with words don't win you argument.

Is your high IQ preventing you from reading your own words on post 14, from which alone I quoted you? You've made sweeping statements against the entire Indian media in your very first post and are too intelligent not to read and comprehend it now?

And do you expect me to read all your posts and reply to them the instant you post them? I came across your tomfoolery much later, and I've addressed them right away. Why are you acting dumb when your shenanigans have been laid bare? Do you also view your pathetic attempts to weasel out and disown your own words as proof of high IQ?

And a useful tip for next time: Address TOI as TOI, not India/Indian media/ Indian State etc etc. High IQ also entails attention to detail.

 

[Fattyacids]

Is your high IQ preventing you from reading your own words on post 14, from which alone I quoted you? You've made sweeping statements against the entire Indian media in your very first post and are too intelligent not to read and comprehend it now?

And do you expect me to read all your posts and reply to them the instant you post them? I came across your tomfoolery much later, and I've addressed them right away. Why are you acting dumb when your shenanigans have been laid bare? Do you also view your pathetic attempts to weasel out and disown your own words as proof of high IQ?

And a useful tip for next time: Address TOI as TOI, not India/Indian media/ Indian State etc etc. High IQ also entails attention to detail.

If you're trouble with reading and comprehension, I'll re-post my reply for you. See how I busted your lie. I did give a dressing down of entire Indian media, but not in post 14. It was post 59. And I stand by what I said.

Exercise some honesty. Post 14 was my very first post, the one with Xinhua article in it, the one which you cherry picked the words and took them out of context.

As I said, if you were truly ruffled by my 1st post, why didn't you raise it earlier? Instead you quoted content from my later post. No. 59, the one where I truly addressed the entire Indian media. It came after Janon's.

So spare me your dumb rhetoric. You don't need to specific down to the last decimal. In the context of my post, anyone with a decent IQ knows I'm addressing TOI. TOI is Indian, and TOI is part of Indian median. Your lie is busted. You can join TOI.
Playing around with words don't win you argument.

If you cannot make rational and intelligent argument, it's not my responsibility to coach you.

If you want to pile on more personal attack coz you lose the argument, be my guest! This is not the first time I debate with PDF Indians.