Frankenstein
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,985
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People stop this nonsense and trolling causing tension here ..
but it isnt a failure, LCA isAnd JF= Joint failure how about this..
Enough to fight against low class enemy. simple logic
tit for tat buddy, they started it
What's more ironic is that the LCA is not a new venture for the Indians, in the past they have had experience with the likes of Kiran Mk I & II, Ajeet was another conversion while the HF-24 was meant to be indigenious, albeit all with mixed results.
For those who thrive in oblivion and compare the LCA with JF-17, need a reality check as within a decade the JF-17 has excelled from a drawing board to serial production with first Squadron inducted, while the LCA has been around for almost a quarter of century with an uncertain future.
lols, when i was five i used to ask my Indian cousin when will India make its LCA he said after 10 years, when i was 15 i ask em again he said after 2 or 3 years, and now i am 18 he is saying that it will take another couple of years
but it isnt a failure, LCA is............
Re: wow..take a look at that Indian news reporter in jf-17 simulator
Indian Members Muaff kar do yarr.. ghalti se Pakistan has got this plane and this is just one little 2.5 gen JF-17 all made by China and only painted by Pakistan. We are not match to you guys as you are super doper creatures with super alien tech in your hands. So please go take some water and let this little toy fly in Pak airs. I hope this little gadget would not have blow your night sleeps away. So take a chill-pill and stop jumping at every thread that has even number "17" in its title. Go cool yourself down and enjoy a happy life.
New Recruit
hey wait i just thought about a solution to inxrease tejas radius.......@ Indian Members,
Since it's Teja, Teja, in your Baheja, check out it's specifications displayed by HAL at Aero India,
Take off distance.........1300 m
Landing Distance........ 1700 m
Combat Radius.......... 300 km ?????
(IMG:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Dc2Wx4jR9F8/S36pQgBKyyI/AAAAAAAABOk/iYPLfQ-UkfE/s1600/CIMG2779.JPG)
(IMG:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Dc2Wx4jR9F8/SxKldW3HK_I/AAAAAAAAAoU/nNbiDdLtOcA/s1600/Image050.jpg)
The Me 109 fighter of Luftwaffee in WWII had a combat radius of 350km and that was the earlier E version !!!
i thinks LCA tejas design is copied from mirage 3 design
Suggest you return to your desk and do your home work first before any chest thumping. What you are claiming for the 90s was a feasibility study by Grumman on a project designated Sabre II.JF-17 was a joint venture with pakistan, JF-17 was ready in the late 90's Itself, But when India bought Sukhoi 30 MKI , Pakistan wanted china to make it even more powerful... and it took you another 7-8 years to make it according to the needs of pakistan....
Imagine That A joint venture by itself took you 18 years to Induct... LCA which started in 1983 was finished in 2001 and due to changing needs of IAF, LCA took much more years, And After the IAF conducted multi-disciplinary trial of LCA The IAF Is impressed by this machine... So there is nothing to burn about it... atleast I can say that its ours... However the Mods have warned me not to ask pakistans contribution to JF-17....
Yea, during hostilities, escaping jet fighters usually engage the afterburner, if the statics given are correct, and if the LCA ever participates in any combat missions, while the tankers tend not loiter too close to the border, i leave the rest to your judgement.hey wait i just thought about a solution to inxrease tejas radius.......
you put a probe that can be used to fill the plane and it can remain in air longer...............hows that for an idea........
opps!!!!! i guess someone smarter than me has already thought of that........
something that looks like this...
and hence tejas can have longer combat radius.....
Yea, during hostilities, escaping jet fighters usually engage the afterburner, if the statics given are correct, and if the LCA ever participates in any combat missions, while the tankers tend not loiter too close to the border, i leave the rest to your judgement.
Suggest you return to your desk and do your home work first before any chest thumping. What you are claiming for the 90s was a feasibility study by Grumman on a project designated Sabre II.
JF-17 or rather the FC-1 didn't make news until mid-90s, even then there is confusion whether it was JF-17 or the J-10.
It doesn't need an armchair jockey to acknowledge that the JF-17 holds the record for being the first aircraft in history to be actually designed by an airforce (PAF) and then completed in record time.