World should not turn soft towards Taliban: Tajikistan tells UNSC

[Reichsmarschall]

we will nuke them to the stone ages.

Easy there tiger, no need to go full retarded over some nobodies

 

[Dalit]

Easy there tiger, no need to go full retarded over some nobodies

Come on. It is just Indians. Tajikistan is another lapdog of Hindustan.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Come on. It is just Indians. Tajikistan is another lapdog of Hindustan.

You can't threaten people with nukes, it sets bad precedent. Not good for PR

 

[Dalit]

You can't threaten people with nukes, it sets bad precedent. Not good for PR

Of course you can. We just did and we love it. Fvck the PR. As Trump puts it, to hell with political correctness. We got them and hell we are going to use them whenever necessary.

LOL papa America is so desperate that it had to send an ambassador to Pak after all. We know exactly why. These pathetic Yanks have no honor.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Of course you can. We just did and we love it. Fvck the PR. As Trump puts it, to hell with political correctness. We got them and hell we are going to use them whenever necessary.

LOL papa America is so desperate that it had to send an ambassador to Pak after all. We know exactly why. These pathetic Yanks have no honor.

Please get off whatever you're smoking. If Pakistan was as powerful and influential as you're purporting it to be you wouldn't be serving islamophobic Dutch thousands of miles away from this supposed hyper global power. Patriotism is one thing but some of you overseas bloke really go over the board.

 

[Lincoln]

Let's think about this a little more maturely. The entire reason Pakistan wants a stable Afghanistan is so that it can connect with the central asian states and trade with them. There's alot of potential for CPEC from central asian states if Afghanistan can become stable.

However, Tajikistan is right. The security situation in Afghanistan is not stable. ISIS-K attacks are happening left, right and center, other ethnic and religious terrorists groups are roaming more freely, which has led to TTP regrouping. I don't think the Taliban can handle it, it's different when you no longer can hide in valleys and mountains but have to be the one on top.

Furthermore, we all can agree that Afghanistan is a mess of a place when it comes to power struggles. Even Imran Khan said that an all inclusive government is the best solution for Afghanistan, Taliban don't seem to be coming down on promise. Power struggles will continue, leading to instability.

Human rights is a social-political issue, but it's another commitment they're failing to fulfill. Can't expect to have good relations with Central Asian states when we have this mess in between.

Frankly, now Taliban is in power, that doesn't mean we turn a soft spot for them. We need to push them to fulfill their commitments.

 

[TNT]

Tajikistan is basically an indian poodle and trying to act as a loyal servant. Why are they constantly doing military exercises along the border? Why are they provoking taliban? Have taliban attacked them or entered their territory? This stupid dictator needs to know that taliban will chew their whole country if they want, but then they will run n hide behind russia.
If this poodle doznt stop creating problems, then Pakistan and china should ask Russia to stay silent for a couple of weeks and let taliban slap these mofos.

 

[Titanium100]

Let's think about this a little more maturely. The entire reason Pakistan wants a stable Afghanistan is so that it can connect with the central asian states and trade with them. There's alot of potential for CPEC from central asian states if Afghanistan can become stable.

However, Tajikistan is right. The security situation in Afghanistan is not stable. ISIS-K attacks are happening left, right and center, other ethnic and religious terrorists groups are roaming more freely, which has led to TTP regrouping. I don't think the Taliban can handle it, it's different when you no longer can hide in valleys and mountains but have to be the one on top.

Furthermore, we all can agree that Afghanistan is a mess of a place when it comes to power struggles. Even Imran Khan said that an all inclusive government is the best solution for Afghanistan, Taliban don't seem to be coming down on promise. Power struggles will continue, leading to instability.

Human rights is a social-political issue, but it's another commitment they're failing to fulfill. Can't expect to have good relations with Central Asian states when we have this mess in between.

Frankly, now Taliban is in power, that doesn't mean we turn a soft spot for them. We need to push them to fulfill their commitments.

Lol at instability just because some puppet says it must be true ridiculous analogy.. The connectivity has already ocuured.. All this other stuff only exist on twitter... IEA is free to do their choosing in electing whomever they want..

The rest is cheap talk and waste of time.. We have gas pipelines and other connectivity going already.. AFG is more important than any PAk city to us.. That should seal all this under a big capital letter

 

[Maula Jatt]

Let's think about this a little more maturely. The entire reason Pakistan wants a stable Afghanistan is so that it can connect with the central asian states and trade with them. There's alot of potential for CPEC from central asian states if Afghanistan can become stable.

However, Tajikistan is right. The security situation in Afghanistan is not stable. ISIS-K attacks are happening left, right and center, other ethnic and religious terrorists groups are roaming more freely, which has led to TTP regrouping. I don't think the Taliban can handle it, it's different when you no longer can hide in valleys and mountains but have to be the one on top.

Furthermore, we all can agree that Afghanistan is a mess of a place when it comes to power struggles. Even Imran Khan said that an all inclusive government is the best solution for Afghanistan, Taliban don't seem to be coming down on promise. Power struggles will continue, leading to instability.

Human rights is a social-political issue, but it's another commitment they're failing to fulfill. Can't expect to have good relations with Central Asian states when we have this mess in between.

Frankly, now Taliban is in power, that doesn't mean we turn a soft spot for them. We need to push them to fulfill their commitments.

Good, we are practically right next to them, it affects us way more than any other country on planet

Someone needs to keep giving them stick for f ing up, or else they'll turn full khwarji on our a**

But at the same time they need economic and millitary assistance for taking on ISIS

Don't go soft, make sure they don't ende up going insane
But not to hard where people end up joining ISIS in droves

Lmao............... What? little small Tajikistan days could be numbered if it doesn't behave...

If you think Pakistan would allow anyone to mess with it's stragetic depth you are deluded.. UNSC This or that. CSTO can't even safe Tajikistan we will nuke them to the stone ages.. A lion is here I promise you I will not be bullied on the LAND nor will anyone in the world be able to undo my redlines or economic security that I promise and assure you. My stragetic goal is linked to the economy and connectivity

You play right in the hands of Afghan nationalists who claim Pakistan to be nothing more than a 21st century colonial power

 

[ARMalik]

Well heavily armed Taliban forces are at the Tajik Border. These Tajik bastar.ds need to behave and become good little kids or Taliban will put a big bamboo down your back side. But one thing is for sure - Tajikistan NEEDS TO BE CLEANED UP BIG TIME !!

 

[BATMAN]

Tajikstan's depressed cuz Northern alliance lost.
end of story.

quite believable but i would still like to read story posted in OP from Tajik source, rather than Indian source.

 

[Battlion25]

quite believable but i would still like to read from Tajik source, rather than Indian source.

This..... honestly just lock this thread... @waz

 

[jamahir]

We can geninuely take Russia in a military clash we outnumber them and have the necesasry logistics to take out their satelittes and blind them.

Name these logistics.

And this is the thread OP of mine I spoke of yesterday. Note the underlined :

Washington: Contradicting perceived proximity to the Soviet Union in the Cold War era, India under the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had toyed with the idea of supporting anti-Russian civilian groups in Pakistan if the then Zia regime was thrown out by Moscow, a recent declassified CIA document has claimed.

According to CIA documents of the era, which were recently declassified and posted on the CIA website under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which is similar to India's Right to Information Act, Gandhi wanted non-interference from both the United States and the then USSR. "Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi would like both the USSR and the United States to end their involvement in South Asia," noted the 31-page CIA document titled 'The Soviet Presence in Afghanistan: Implications for the Regional Powers and the US'.

While taking note of the historic India-USSR relationship in particular in the defence field, the CIA report of April 1985 noted that India is likely to become increasingly concerned about long-range Soviet intentions in the region and could find itself moving towards confrontation with the Soviets if Pakistan was effectively neutralised.

"New Delhi regards Pakistan as a strategic buffer against the USSR and would oppose Moscow's effort to dominate Pakistan. New Delhi and Moscow would find themselves supporting rival factions within Pakistan," said the report, according to which Moscow had plans to change the regime in Pakistan and extend its influence beyond Afghanistan. In that case, the report said, "The Indians would seek to significantly reduce their dependence on Moscow and reorder their strategic relationship with the USSR, the United States and China if they perceived Soviet ambitions as extending beyond Afghanistan toward the subcontinent."

According to the report, the Soviets tried to heighten India's suspicion about Pakistan's intentions and its security relationship with the US in order to foster Indo-Pakistani tensions and heighten New Delhi’s dependence on Moscow. "In Soviet view, conflict between India and Pakistan would work toward solving Moscow's Afghan problem and would give Moscow opportunities to strengthen its position in South Asia," the report said.

"If (Gen) Zia (Ul Haq) regime were to fall, the Indians might try to prevent Soviet attempt to dominate Pakistan by supporting rival Pakistani political factions, Soviet military moves against an already neutralised Pakistan could even result in military confrontation with India," it added.

Six months later when Gandhi was planning to meet General Zia on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, the CIA analyzed that the then Indian Prime Minister, despite his strong public views on Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, was unlikely to push him hard on it. "Gandhi is unlikely to push Zia hard about the Pakistani nuclear program, although he probably will at least mention his continuing concern," noted the top secret CIA document dated October 21, 1985.

"For his part, Zia is also likely to propose ideas on ways to improve the bilateral relationship. He may suggest regular high-level diplomatic talks in addition to the formal Joint Commission sessions that focuses on trade, communications and cultural exchanges," the report said. "Zia may also solicit Gandhi's views on whether as the Pakistanis believe the Soviets are becoming serious about a negotiated settlement in Afghanistan," it said.

So if Zia ul Haq was deposed by Pakistani leftists then India would support Zia's mullah-based cadre and against the leftists by getting Zia back into power because India essentially didn't want to get into USSR's Socialist alliance via the USSR gaining political and socio-economic influence in the national policy in Pakistan. Zia wasn't some great independent entity but someone propped up or to-be-propped-up by bigger powers including India. @Dalit. @Taimoor Khan, this is for you too.

This stupid dictator needs to know that taliban will chew their whole country if they want, but then they will run n hide behind russia.

Stupid dictators are now in Afghanistan, not in Tajikistan. And I want to see Taliban take on the Russian military.

IEA is free to do their choosing in electing whomever they want..

What is this IEA ?

 

[HttpError]

Taliban should open a front with Tajikistan and should demand the return of all the escaped traitors.

 

[TNT]

Stupid dictators are now in Afghanistan, not in Tajikistan. And I want to see Taliban take on the Russian military.

Oh i forgot, u r the moron who thinks libya under Gaddafi was ideal democracy. Yeah Tajikistan is a democracy and the president been sitting there democratically since 27 years, right?
USSR was beaten like a dog not very long ago, so yeah bring them.