What's new

World saw how China was forced to withdraw from Doklam: RSS

.
“Perhaps for the first time India’s stand was very tough…entire world has seen and acknowledged that China was forced to withdraw,” RSS Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh (chief spokesperson) Manmohan Vaidya said.

Praising the central government for its “tough” handling of the Doklam crisis, RSS today said that it was the first instance that “China was forced to withdraw”. “Perhaps for the first time India’s stand was very tough…entire world has seen and acknowledged that China was forced to withdraw,” RSS Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh (chief spokesperson) Manmohan Vaidya said. He was addressing the media at hotel Kridha Residency of Vrindavan after the three-day Samanvay Baithak of RSS and its affiliate organizations.

Vaidya also “congratulated” the new cabinet, and applauded the government for appointing Nirmala Sitharaman as the defense minister. “It is a good decision…we welcome her,” Vaidya said. Among the organizations who attended the meet included Sanskar Bharti, Sahkar Bharti and Bharatiya Kisan Sangh. Top brass of RSS including Sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat, Sarkaryavah Bhaiyyaji Joshi and senior leaders of various organizations remained present for three days. These organizations also supported demonetization during the meet. “Shocks (in economy) were witnessed earlier but now people are coming out of those earlier shocks and are realizing that the decision of demonetization will benefit country in the long run,” Vaidya said.

Significantly, weeks after the note ban, ahead of the Uttar Pradesh polls, several senior RSS leaders of the state had submitted a report to the central leadership that the move caused severe hardships to people. Vaidya noted that the affiliates also shared their observations on ongoing economic situation. “Small and medium scale industries must be promoted for India’s economic growth,” he said, emphasizing that focus should be on “job creation” and “agriculture-based industries”.

Several outfits like Swadeshi Jagran Manch and Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh are learnt to have expressed reservations against economic policies of the government. Vaidya also credited the Indian “family system” for saving its economy. Taking note of a the global recession a few years earlier, he said that “India bore the least impact of economic meltdown” because of its “strong family system”. He also noted that the RSS expressed concern on “Casteism” and it was acknowledged that “the Sangh has to undertake efforts to eradicate it” and “organisations should spread harmony and fraternity” to remove differences”.

Talking about Swadeshi, he said that it “is not limited to consumption of goods”. “Your language, dress, the manner in which you celebrate festivals and birthdays,” he said, adding that the RSS supports the SJM call to boycott Chinese goods.
 
.
no one can shake pla
giphy-facebook_s.jpg
 
. .
.
Facts never change no matter how much big u lie on the ground reality dokhlam has Chinese presence what was left over was few Indian bodies
 
. .
So according to BBC and Reuters, its Indians that withdraw, Chinese soldiers stayed put. Does India sensor Reuters/BBC or this guy is just a compulsive liar.
 
.
So according to BBC and Reuters, its Indians that withdraw, Chinese soldiers stayed put. Does India censor Reuters/BBC or this guy is just a compulsive liar.
not all countries are like china, where bad news is suppressed to make the country look good. in india its usually the other way around, the bad stuff get more screen time due to ratings
 
.
not all countries are like china, where bad news is suppressed to make the country look good. in india its usually the other way around, the bad stuff get more screen time due to ratings

I beg to differ . In this case, Indians have been ignoring the international press talking about India gave in by withdrawing while Chinese troops stayed put. So the narrative was spinned to be about that China have been unable to build the road so India won. This guy is now altering the facts by saying China withdraw, when their troops are still there. That is a proven fact. As much of a fact that Indian troops left.
 
.
I beg to differ . In this case, Indians have been ignoring the international press talking about India gave in by withdrawing while Chinese troops stayed put. So the narrative was spinned to be about that China have been unable to build the road so India won. This guy is now altering the facts by saying China withdraw, when their troops are still there. That is a proven fact. As much of a fact that Indian troops left.
really? i think its you guys doing the ignoring
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...who-blinked-in-china-india-military-standoff/
india "won" because its conditions were met, ie status quo, ie no road building by china
 
.
I beg to differ . In this case, Indians have been ignoring the international press talking about India gave in by withdrawing while Chinese troops stayed put. So the narrative was spinned to be about that China have been unable to build the road so India won. This guy is now altering the facts by saying China withdraw, when their troops are still there. That is a proven fact. As much of a fact that Indian troops left.

they called you sissy

really? i think its you guys doing the ignoring
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...who-blinked-in-china-india-military-standoff/
india "won" because its conditions were met, ie status quo, ie no road building by china

is that Tapsee Pannu?
 
.
really? i think its you guys doing the ignoring
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...who-blinked-in-china-india-military-standoff/
india "won" because its conditions were met, ie status quo, ie no road building by china

Who wins is subjective. But who withdraw and who stayed is not. Also, China had not resumed road building.

It's not honest to said that China is forced to withdraw when it's India that withdraw their troop.

http://www.Bbc.com/news/world-asia-41070767

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ree-to-end-border-standoff-idUSKCN1B80II?il=0

These ones also claimed that Indian troops withdraw.

they called you sissy



is that Tapsee Pannu?


India is starting their campaign of misinformation by making up facts such as China withdraw its troops. When in fact, India withdraw.

Let's not talking about the road building here, it's about an Indian now claimed that it's China that withdraw.
 
.
Who wins is subjective. But who withdraw and who stayed is not. Also, China had not resumed road building.

It's not honest to said that China is forced to withdraw when it's India that withdraw their troop.

http://www.Bbc.com/news/world-asia-41070767

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ree-to-end-border-standoff-idUSKCN1B80II?il=0

These ones also claimed that Indian troops withdraw.




India is starting their campaign of misinformation by making up facts such as China withdraw its troops. When in fact, India withdraw.

Let's not talking about the road building here, it's about an Indian now claimed that it's China that withdraw.

Forget it man, these slumdogs have their own interpretation of things. Many Western Media already convinced that China lost the standoff and naturally the slumdogs can easily grab those articles and proclaim victory. Time will tell, once our roads are completed they will be the one finally realizing how naive it was jumping up and down and prematurely celebrated this so called win.
 
.
Who wins is subjective. But who withdraw and who stayed is not. Also, China had not resumed road building.

It's not honest to said that China is forced to withdraw when it's India that withdraw their troop.

http://www.Bbc.com/news/world-asia-41070767

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ree-to-end-border-standoff-idUSKCN1B80II?il=0

These ones also claimed that Indian troops withdraw.




India is starting their campaign of misinformation by making up facts such as China withdraw its troops. When in fact, India withdraw.

Let's not talking about the road building here, it's about an Indian now claimed that it's China that withdraw.

Sissy
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom