What's new

Women prefer men in red

Of course you can. You choose not to. If you get punched by someone, regardless of their gender, you have the right punch them back. :azn: Whether or not you choose to is another story.

In Texas, woman beaters are looked down upon. You simply do not do it. It is best to walk away. If the cops show up from a domestic violence call 99% of the time the guy goes to jail. Not to mention what man ( when he is about 3 times stronger) would hit a woman??
 
. .
In Texas, woman beaters are looked down upon.

Well if a woman hits you first then you have every right to hit them back. It's no longer about being a woman beater if that happens.

If the cops show up from a domestic violence call 99% of the time the guy goes to jail.

Yeah, well that's a problem and a sexist double standard in your (or any other western country). Just because it's happening, doesn't mean it's right.

Not to mention what man ( when he is about 3 times stronger) would hit a woman??

I don't buy the strength argument. Are you going to take a punch from a 100 lb guy? Probably vast majority of men won't. Conversely, if a 150+ lb woman punches you, are you going to take it?

The logic doesn't add up.

Strength isn't the problem here. It's gender. Men have been brought up thinking that you don't hit women since they are weaker. That reeks of being pussy-whipped since it should say that you don't hit physically-weak people.
 
.
I am going to test this out, I will wear a red suit with red shirt, red shoes and a red scarf around my neck.

Let's see what happens.

images
:devil::chilli::devil:
 
Last edited:
.
I am going to test this out, I will wear a red suit with red shirt, red shoes and a red scarf around my neck.

Let's see what happens.

Have you taken a trip to any village in our region, esp. in the South...men wear either bright pink or highlighter-green or, more sensibly to a western eye, navy blue.

All this gender-specificity of colour seems only a matter of perception. Pink is THE manly colour in Lar Sindh!
 
.
SMC reply:

A 100 lb. guy is somehow different from a 125lb gal. Granted, physical violence is wrong all the way around.

I guess I was joking about the blackeyes ( though I have seen friends of mine with one).. the only time she swung at me, I ducked, and she missed, and we ended up laughing about it later.

There is a fine line between being pussy-whipped and being in love. After 30 years of marriage, I think I know the difference.

I still can't bring myself to hitting a woman. Heck all you have to do is just hold her hands and restrain her!!:D
 
. .
no they want you to be in pink so they could like you just the way they like there cellphone .. !!!
 
.
SMC reply:

A 100 lb. guy is somehow different from a 125lb gal. Granted, physical violence is wrong all the way around.

I guess I was joking about the blackeyes ( though I have seen friends of mine with one).. the only time she swung at me, I ducked, and she missed, and we ended up laughing about it later.

There is a fine line between being pussy-whipped and being in love. After 30 years of marriage, I think I know the difference.

I still can't bring myself to hitting a woman. Heck all you have to do is just hold her hands and restrain her!!:D

Fair enough I guess. My point regarding a 100 lb guy was not so much comparing his strength to another female but more about the argument that women are weaker so you shouldn't hit. That isa clear double standard since not all women are weak and not all guys are strong, yet the emphasis is only put on not hitting women. What about not hitting weaker men? What about hitting stronger women? To me, the logic doesn't add up, and is one of the many entrenched anti-male double standards.

I suppose I understand your point about being pussy-whipped. Now another guy was saying on a forum that men should hit the gym so they can take a punch from a woman. That's crystal-clear pussy-whipped.

About restraining - well if you can restrain her then thats great, but in the event that you can't you then you should be free to hit her.
 
.
Fair enough I guess. My point regarding a 100 lb guy was not so much comparing his strength to another female but more about the argument that women are weaker so you shouldn't hit. That isa clear double standard since not all women are weak and not all guys are strong, yet the emphasis is only put on not hitting women. What about not hitting weaker men? What about hitting stronger women? To me, the logic doesn't add up, and is one of the many entrenched anti-male double standards.

I suppose I understand your point about being pussy-whipped. Now another guy was saying on a forum that men should hit the gym so they can take a punch from a woman. That's crystal-clear pussy-whipped.

About restraining - well if you can restrain her then thats great, but in the event that you can't you then you should be free to hit her.

Here is the deep South take on it (assuming it is a spouse or such):

A 100lb. guy who tries to take on someone like me (6ft. and in fairly good shape) is a dumbass and richly deserves a pounding.

Most women will not try fisty cuff a guy. They will usually throw stuff ( plates etc.) Easily avoided - you can dodge it etc. If they get out of control, you can also walk away. Go to a friend's house till she cools off etc.

If she is completely out of control, call the cops. Remember I said 99%? when cops clearly see you were NOT nutso, she will go to jail.

I still don't see a reason to hit a woman. I would have a hard time justifying it.

If the woman is a stranger in a public place, let the cops handle it also.
 
.
well couple days back i bought this t shirt with this printing .. it may not be the best but its cooll

9-fpj-b.png


and this

PMR-G-M.jpg


and this ...

FTT-B-M.jpg
 
.
A 100lb. guy who tries to take on someone like me (6ft. and in fairly good shape) is a dumbass and richly deserves a pounding.

Right, so why not apply the same standard to women? If you want equal standards, that is. If a woman tries to take on a stronger man, she is a dumbass and richly deserves a pounding.

But what many people (not just you ) suggest is quite interesting.

If a 100 lb guy hits a strong guy, he's a dumbass and deserves a pounding.
If a woman (assuming she's roughly as strong as a 100 lb guy) hits a strong guy, she is weak and you should walk away.

Doesn't add up, ya know.

Most women will not try fisty cuff a guy.

Neither will most guys. But the point I am making is to show examples which prove double standards.

They will usually throw stuff ( plates etc.) Easily avoided - you can dodge it etc.

What would you do if a guy does it?


If they get out of control, you can also walk away. Go to a friend's house till she cools off etc.

Again, what if a guy did the same?

If she is completely out of control, call the cops. Remember I said 99%? when cops clearly see you were NOT nutso, she will go to jail.

And get what, a night in jail? Compared to maybe weeks or months for a guy doing the same.

Btw, I am not trying to flame you. It's very frustrating to see so many men think like this (due to no fault of their own since they were brought up like this).
 
Last edited:
.
SMC and TJ


well i have seen ppl hiting and beating women, most probably this happens in a joint familly system and the women wants to seperate and create its own territory but the guy donot wants to leave his parrents and his familly, so 90% of quarells in Pakistan happen over this issue and gues what in many cases the guys either give in and take it or in some minor cases they break it .. !!!

Its the wife who comes out victorious in majority of cases .. !!!
 
. .
Oh guys , All 3 RGB is very common among punjabi villagers , if you guys dnt belive me then watch out punjbi movies.
My suggestion: if your complextion is dark or darkish then dnt ever try to wear red. It will make u ............,
 
.
Back
Top Bottom