After 1924 however, with the advent of modern nation-states, there has been a constant struggle to establish a legitimate Muslim political order in Muslim-populated regions. Korea or Japan they are not populated Muslim countries, and unlike Muslims they never in world rulers politics and muslim dominated countires are at the center of this struggle are a set of issues: Islam’s relationship to the state, state’s relationship to Islam, and role of religion in public life.
Democracy, in its contemporary perception, can be divided into liberal and religious democracy. The former, because of some issues related to it(we tried in pakistan since 72 years and it is not working), which directly or indirectly negate the creator's absolute authority on his creation in terms of leadership, governance, political freedom, etc. is not encouraged by Islamic law. Islamic Law, according to the provisions of some verses from the holy Qur’an encourages democracy but not liberal democracy like that of the
western world. The religious democracy that can go with our modern time and solve many contemporary problems of the Muslim world is the model which was introduced by late Ayatollah Imam Khomeini after the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. The Iranian religious democracy, in general, is based on an instrumental and methodological view towards democracy. The main claim in religious democracy is to establish a government based on majority religious values because It believes that democracy is stable only when reaches out of political borders to become an inner part of individual and social life; you are living in a Muslims majority country, right or in Japan or Korea or Singapore ?This would happen in Islamic societies only when democracy is rooted in Islamic traditions and customs. In other words observing the cultural situation and realities in Islamic societies, the best and most stable democracy is religious democracy.
and only solution to these rapist are
View attachment 669681