What's new

With powerful army and Chinese protection, Wa is de facto independent from Myanmar

ghost250

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
https://www.armyrecognition.com/ana...v3_N1hps_YTOaB6_g_7o86dao14gg6k2YI5qoyd_x4Epk






  1. You are here:
  2. Home
  3. Focus / Analysis

With powerful army and Chinese protection, Wa is de facto independent from Myanmar
analysis focus army defence military industry army
POSTED ON TUESDAY, 23 APRIL 2019 10:07



Joe Kumbun* reminds in the Irrawaddy, a newspaper from Myanmar (formerly Burma), that he had written, in May 2017, that the United Wa State Army (UWSA) could potentially create unprecedented political risk in the country through the intensified pursuit of its interests—claiming its territory as a state and rejecting the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) through its alliance with other ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) while strengthening its military capability.

With_powerful_army_and_Chinese_protection_Wa_is_de_facto_independent_from_Myanmar.jpg

The UWSA (United Wa State Army) is abundantly equipped by China with a wide range of sophisticated weapons (Picture source: Network Media Group)

In April 2017, Joe Kumbun details, the UWSA marked its 30th anniversary with a grand military parade. The UWSA’s armed forces displayed sophisticated weapons including heavy artillery, drones and helicopters. The UWSA now has an estimated 30,000 active military personnel, who are specially trained by Chinese military officers. It produces ammunition developed by Chinese technicians. Furthermore, it has modern weaponry such as tanks, 105mm howitzers, sniper rifles, anti-tank weapons and helicopters from China. The UWSA is the only group that owns the helicopters, which are armed with TY-90 air-to-air missiles.

China appears to have protected the Wa territory from any enemies, particularly the Tatmadaw (Myanmar’s army). The Chinese government needs the UWSA in order to play its political game in Myanmar. It has become more publicly visible that the UWSA is obtaining modern military equipment and weaponry from China. In 2013, China sent helicopters equipped with missiles, which could provide a “serious deterrent” to the Tatmadaw. It appears that China started pushing its investment in the UWSA after Myanmar veered toward the West by, for instance, accepting a visit from a U.S. warship in April 2017.

Besides, China’s regional rival, India, made a deal with the Tatmadaw to supply unprecedented torpedoes to Myanmar’s Navy in March 2017. The contract was worth US$37.9 million (57.67 billion kyats) and was a major turning point for the Tatmadaw, which began to look toward other countries after depending on China for many decades. India also provides night-vision devices, Bailey bridges, rocket launchers, mortars, rifles, communications and Inmarsat sets to the Myanmar Army.

China does not want Myanmar to drift out of its orbit, Joe Kumbun comments. If Myanmar were ever to fully abandon China and throw its lot in with the West, or should the Myanmar government fail to fulfill its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects and act against Beijing’s geopolitical and geo-economic interests, China will use its protected UWSA to enforce a “carrot and stick” approach to both the Myanmar government and the Tatmadaw.

The UWSA continues to claim state status for its territory, though it is located in Shan State of Myanmar. It also firmly rejects signing the NCA despite State Counselor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi having urged them to sign it. The UWSA controls the territories referred to by the government as “Special Region No. 2 in Shan State,” while the UWSA itself refers to them as Wa State. The 2008 Constitution officially classifies this territory as the Wa Self-Administered Division, but the UWSA referred to its territory as the Wa State Government Special Administrative Region on January 1, 2009.

Undeniably, the “Wa” enclave now has de facto independence from Myanmar, operating outside the sphere of national sovereignty, Joe Kumbun concludes.
 
. .
China does not want Myanmar to drift out of its orbit, Joe Kumbun comments. If Myanmar were ever to fully abandon China and throw its lot in with the West, or should the Myanmar government fail to fulfill its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects and act against Beijing’s geopolitical and geo-economic interests, China will use its protected UWSA to enforce a “carrot and stick” approach to both the Myanmar government and the Tatmadaw.
Now that is proper future planning!

Respect...
 
.
Now that is proper future planning!

Respect...
China currently does not support the regional independence of these Han people at the government level, and it is already a supporting to Myanmar government.
If China is Russia, and in the way of Russian behavior, Wa has been incorporated into China long time ago.

However, if the Burmese government is willing to go its own way and adopt military intervention and violent suppression (that is, massacres to maintain unity), no matter whether these areas are Han or not, China will never sit idly by.

Although these people in the border areas of Myanmar do not have Chinese nationality, they are Han Chinese. China needs to be responsible for them in humanitarian and national sentiments.
If it is not the evil British empire using military means to force the Qing government of China and the Republic of China to cede these lands, Those areas are originally the inherent territory of China, which is dominated by Chinese Han and other Chinese minorities.
 
Last edited:
.
China currently does not support the regional independence of these Han people at the government level, and it is already a supporting to Myanmar government.
If China is Russia, and in the way of Russian behavior, Wa has been incorporated into China long time ago.

However, if the Burmese government is willing to go its own way and adopt military intervention and violent suppression (that is, massacres to maintain unity), no matter whether these areas are Han or not, China will never sit idly by.

Although these people in the border areas of Myanmar do not have Chinese nationality, they are Han Chinese. China needs to be responsible for them in humanitarian and national sentiments.
If it is not the evil British empire using military means to force the Qing government of China and the Republic of China to cede these lands, Those areas are originally the inherent territory of China, which is dominated by Chinese Han and other Chinese minorities.
Burmese are also chinese right
 
.
China currently does not support the regional independence of these Han people at the government level, and it is already a supporting to Myanmar government.
If China is Russia, and in the way of Russian behavior, Wa has been incorporated into China long time ago.

However, if the Burmese government is willing to go its own way and adopt military intervention and violent suppression (that is, massacres to maintain unity), no matter whether these areas are Han or not, China will never sit idly by.

Although these people in the border areas of Myanmar do not have Chinese nationality, they are Han Chinese. China needs to be responsible for them in humanitarian and national sentiments.
If it is not the evil British empire using military means to force the Qing government of China and the Republic of China to cede these lands, Those areas are originally the inherent territory of China, which is dominated by Chinese Han and other Chinese minorities.
Those boat people from 1970s Vietnam were considered ethnic Chinese too but after living with them for a few decades we (specifically HKers) discovered they are actually Vietnamese. The label "ethnic Chinese" needs to be applied very, very carefully.
 
.
Those boat people from 1970s Vietnam were considered ethnic Chinese too but after living with them for a few decades we (specifically HKers) discovered they are actually Vietnamese. The label "ethnic Chinese" needs to be applied very, very carefully.
I am talking about Han Chinese to be accurate.

Burmese are also chinese right
The Chinese have two meanings: those with Chinese nationality and those with Chinese ancestry.

From a legal perspective, only those with Chinese nationality can be called Chinese, and those who do not have Chinese nationality in foreign countries can only be called Ethnic Chinese 华人/华裔.

Imagine if the Chinese government and the Chinese army carried out a massacre against Burmeses in China (whether or not they have Burma nationality), what do you feel!

Plus,China does not want to see turmoil in its surrounding areas, so as not to affect its economic rise. Do not underestimate China's ability and determination to take military action in order to develop its economy.
 
Last edited:
.
I am talking about Han Chinese to be accurate.
I know what you mean. I mean that China should not be claiming non-Chinese citizens. People outside of China have all kinds of different heritage. They tell you they are Chinese but in fact they are Vietnamese. It's too easy to fake it. The best solution is simply to bar anybody who is not a Chinese citizen. Plain and simple. Those Wa guys should not be considered Chinese even by ethnicity or heritage. They are their own de facto country since the Burmese refuse to give them citizenship.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom