What's new

Winston Churchill wanted to nuke Kremlin ‘to win Cold War,’ FBI memo reveals

.
Yea an ape Africa is going to educate us about beastiality.:nhl_checking:
Who is talking about bestiality? :rofl: Looks like working in call centres all your life still hasn't improved your English :lol:

Now go on, don't you have some women to rape? Street shitting smelly Indian
 
.
Who is talking about bestiality? :rofl: Looks like working in call centres all your life still hasn't improved your English :lol:

Now go on, don't you have some women to rape? Street shitting smelly Indian
Wash your filthy mouth before you spout your gibrish, ape. Perhaps Ebola will get you soon.
 
.
Wash your filthy mouth before you spout your gibrish, ape. Perhaps Ebola will get you soon.
You should wash your mouth out too. I can smell the curry from miles away. Now go and answer the phone calls, you don't want to keep people waiting or you'll get fired. Filthy Indian.
 
. . . . .
I don't know what Churchill thought of us, but I'm sure it wasn't flattering. He probably thought we were backwards opium-smoking yellow monkeys :lol:. But that wouldn't be an uncharitable impression, given the state China was in at the time. The verity of a statement is totally independent of whether one likes it or not. Anyway, we set out to prove that late-19th/early 20th century China was a totally anomalous period in our history, and we accomplished that. Have you proved yet that Churchill statements on India were only applicable to India at the time, and not intrinsic to India as a civilization?

Anyway, you seem to be confused about Churchill's (or anybody else's) understanding of the term "country". Cultural and religious similarities, or a "unified identity" does not make a country. Only political sovereignty does. When were the instances of unified political control? The British Raj would be one instance. Mughals were also close. Two foreign dynasties that did not use Indian institutions but imposed their own (rendering your "unified identity" argument invalid). But I can't think of any other instances.


In that case, China is still a geographical expression, not a country.And this is more true for China than India. Manchu, Outer Mongolia, Tibet,Turkistan ( XinXiang ), and South China ( cooked Barbarian ) are not part of Chinese Nation.

India has a unifying Hindu identity except in Kashmir, Nagaland,Meghalya, and Manipur; only 1.7% of India's area.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Everyone has an impression, but seems Chinese are the greatest admirers of whitemen. :lol::lol: Churchill said those words during Peak of Indian freedom struggle and nationalism under Congress to delude himself. ;)

If you agree with Churchill you also agree with Sun Yat Sen(the father of Chinese nationalism) :)

“In order to restore our national independence, we must first restore the Chinese nation. In order to restore the Chinese nation, we must drive the barbarian Manchus back to the Changbai Mountains. In order to get rid of the barbarians, we must first overthrow the present tyrannical, dictatorial, ugly and corrupt Qing government.”

[ LETTER ] - Taipei Times

Didn't Manchus add more territories to China making them 'historical Chinese land' :lol::lol::lol:

How many times are you going to repeat your lie??

1) Your source is anonymous letter.
2) "Barbarian" is term used in antiquity, nobody uses it in 20th century, not even in 19 century.


Mancus didn't, Qing dynasty China expanded Chinese territories. Qing is an alliance of Manchu and Chinese.
 
.
This is ever more hilarious, the fake commie nationalism. :lol::lol:

Outrage as China lays claim to Genghis Khan - Telegraph

Substandard journalism which you love to quote. Totally taken out of context.
From the article:
"We define him as a great man of the Chinese people, a hero of the Mongolian nationality, and a giant in world history," said Guo Wurong, the manager of the new Genghis Khan "mausoleum" in China's Inner Mongolia province.

Chinese people, because his descendents from Golden family are Chinese citizen today.
 
.
Substandard journalism which you love to quote. Totally taken out of context.
From the article:
"We define him as a great man of the Chinese people, a hero of the Mongolian nationality, and a giant in world history," said Guo Wurong, the manager of the new Genghis Khan "mausoleum" in China's Inner Mongolia province.

Chinese people, because his descendents from Golden family are Chinese citizen today.

"Great man of Chinese people" :lol::lol:
 
.
How many times are you going to repeat your lie??

1) Your source is anonymous letter.
2) "Barbarian" is term used in antiquity, nobody uses it in 20th century, not even in 19 century.


Mancus didn't, Qing dynasty China expanded Chinese territories. Qing is an alliance of Manchu and Chinese.

since you agree with Winston Churchill, I hope you also agree with one of your own Sun Yat Sen seen as the father of Chinese Nationalism. :o::o:
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom