FULL_METAL
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,224
- Reaction score
- -15
- Country
- Location
masala nahi beta masla hota hai, pehle apni zubaan saaf karo phir toilet saaf karnaSuna hai apke yaha toilet ka masala hai.,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
masala nahi beta masla hota hai, pehle apni zubaan saaf karo phir toilet saaf karnaSuna hai apke yaha toilet ka masala hai.,,
I think India shall retaliate by Tactical Nuke on Pakistan's Military and Nuclear establishment.
That would be a somewhat balance response; counter force strike, but how does that reflect the "massive retaliation" threat?
I do not think that India shall target any civilian population unless Indian civilian population is targeted. Massive means more in number to destroy the total military and Nuclear capability of Pakistan.
Indian Nuclear Doctrine states the use of nuclear weapons by Pakistan on Indian troops anywhere, requires India to response with "massive retaliation"
what does "massive retaliation" mean: only military targets, or also possibly civilian targets
Pakistan doctrine seems to be situation dependent and split on three levels; tactical, operational, and strategic
one would assume it means, if overwhelmed with tactical thrusts in one sector, it would be met with a nuclear response to push back that limit thrust
Pakistan's doctrine is actually just copying the NATO strategy for countering soviet tank thrusts into western Europe through the FULDA Gap
A definitive NO
that's the Point
Pakistan is not, and can not be the Third Largest
it will run out of uranium ore soon, probably in about 5-10 more years
India already has more fissile material, plutonium that just needs to be reprocessed today, then Pakistan can hope to make with what limit raw material it has
this is why Pakistan is rapidly developing as much fissile material it can, and then look to negotiate some balance on the subcontinent
and while India probably has fewer ready to go weapons, all it has to do is tell its scientist we want 100 more by next year from the stocks of fissile material
Keep your gates closed
Nahi toh TTP aajayga
masala nahi beta masla hota hai, pehle apni zubaan saaf karo phir toilet saaf karna
Pakistan would respond by going massive
but both nations have population centers near many of their military installations
would counter-force strikes cause massive unintentional civilian collateral deaths?
give an example of what you think they would target; technically they exchanged list of "nuclear" production/energy sites both sides agreed not to target, but who knows with these circumstances would all bets be off?
What happen if we simultaneously fire 50 or more nuclear missiles in India targets all the major IAF installations, Military H.Q reactors all the major cities and Indian Parliament nobody will live to retaliate back.It is a general agreement but in case we are attacked with nuclear weapon, our policy is very clear. We shall inflict a massive unacceptable damage to enemy. Those agreement shall not stand in case we are attacked with nuclear weapon. In next 5 years from now, we shall have some very potent airdefense like AAD, PAD, S300, S400 and LR sam And MR SAM in place. Indian AIr defense shall be vertically impossible to penitrate.
jaal nehi raha hai beta, mazaaq mazaaq me thoda tang khichayee kar raha tha, khair jane de, apne ko ban nahi honaMasla ho ya masala, appke jaal q rahy hai..
What happen if we simultaneously fire 50 or more nuclear missiles in India targets all the major IAF installations, Military H.Q reactors all the major cities and Indian Parliament nobody will live to retaliate back.
Few days back indian defence cabinet allow purchasing of S-400Do you really have PAD and S400...?
Anyways no restrictions on dreams and wishes.You may assume every possibility.But real life is really bitter.