What's new

Will Imran Khan change Pakistan's stance toward Israel?

Will Imran Khan change Pakistan's stance toward Israel?

350139_1689297_updates.jpg


Much has been written in national and international press about Imran Khan's address to the nation since his party won majority in the parliament in July 25 election.

Media outlets at home and abroad ran editorials and analyses on what Khan's victory means for his country and the world at large.

The part of his first address that was discussed in international media was Pakistan's foreign policy and his plans to foster relations with other nations especially neighboring countries.

Although Pakistan does not recognize Israel, the media in the Jewish state has also reported developments in Pakistan since July 25 elections.

In an analysis published in the Times of Israel, an author questioned whether Pakistan's new leader will be any different from his predecessors when it comes to Islamic Republic's relations with the Jewish state.

Written by Charles Dunst, the article gave complete profile of the Pakistani leader, highlighting his career as sportsman and a politician.

The author also discussed the allegations Imran Khan has long faced about his connection to Jewish lobby after his marriage to Jemima Khan.

The author thinks Imran is less critical of Isreal than many other leaders in the Muslim world.

The analyst interpreted one of Khan's tweet from 2011 as an apparent repudiation of anti-Semitism.

“Just as questioning the holocaust is painful to the Jews, & we respect this, so abuse of the Prophet (PBUH) is even more painful to Muslims” the author referred to this tweet of Khan which he had sent out to condemn blasphemy.

Alluding to Khushid Kasuri's 2005 meeting with Israeli counterpart Silvan Shalom in Istanbol, the writer questioned whether Khan would build on this relations or follow Saudi Arabia which seems to have softened its stance towards Tel Aviv.

The analyst also quotes, Hussain Haqqani, the former Pakistani ambassador to Washington, saying “His (Imran Khan's )political stance has been anti-Israel.Given his own Islamic-nationalist rhetoric, I do not see Imran Khan as the man who would reach out to Israel on behalf of Pakistan. But miracles can always happen.".

Arguing that Israel is open to establishing relation with Pakistan, the author presented Isreali prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu speech in which he refuted claims that his country's relationship with India is in any way a threat to Pakistan.

“We are not enemies of Pakistan and Pakistan should not be our enemy either,” Netanyahu told reporters," the Israeli PM was quoted as saying at an event in India last year.


“Negative perceptions of Israel by some in Pakistan, and Israel’s close partnership with India, may impose some limits on what is possible,” he cautioned. “But that doesn’t mean quiet ties based on security cooperation or access to Israeli technology are out of the question.

“They can provide important mutual benefits even before establishing official relations is possible," Daniel Shapiro, the former US ambassador to Israel is reported as having said .

https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/350139-will-imran-khan-change-pakistans-stance-toward-israel
Why dont we abolish our armed forces and become a satellite state to india, us or china ? These liberals have no purpose but just to make money ...
 
. . . . .
What Pakistan have achieved with decades of current stance other than destroying own property in protests and Palestinian leadership calling Kashmiri struggle for freedom terrorism? Israel is reality which we better leave it for Jesus and Imam Mahdi to undo.
 
.
we can benifit from israel a lot but we are spoons of arab nations whom themselves recognized israel
 
.
we can benifit from israel a lot but we are spoons of arab nations whom themselves recognized israel
Nope Arabs don't dictate us so please leave this old story now. If we had to do anything is with Arabs we would have been in Yemen and we would have recognized Israel already because most Arabs do recognize it. No one wants to say the hard truth here and let me say it. Pakistani don't make peace with a regime that is doing illegal occupation and our relations with Israel will never exist until 1967 line is observed he same case is with Armenia and else where.
 
.
Relationship with Israel has the least priority.

What Pakistan have achieved with decades of current stance other than destroying own property in protests and Palestinian leadership calling Kashmiri struggle for freedom terrorism? Israel is reality which we better leave it for Jesus and Imam Mahdi to undo.

Truth be told, Israel is an irrelevant entity to Pakistan.

Apart from our stance in Israeli Palestinian conflict we don't share much in any area. Israel is too far away.

If the Palestinian conflict didn't exist there would be zero relevancy.
 
. .
Relationship with Israel has the least priority.



Truth be told, Israel is an irrelevant entity to Pakistan.

Apart from our stance in Israeli Palestinian conflict we don't share much in any area. Israel is too far away.

If the Palestinian conflict didn't exist there would be zero relevancy.

Palestine is also irrelevant for Pakistan, it's Arab problem what we have to do with it.
 
. .
I suppose i should just take your word or is there any proof
You don’t have to believe me. But think about it, id Pakistan dealt with Israel openly before, why would you not have heard about it?
 
.
:omghaha::omghaha:“We are not enemies of Pakistan and Pakistan should not be our enemy either,” Netanyahu told reporters,":rofl::rofl:

Hahaha, we've shot down several of their jets without sustaining any casualties of our own, no wonder he's so scared.

Israel is reality which we better leave it for Jesus and Imam Mahdi to undo.

Did the Saladin or Baybars say the Crusader occupation was to be left to Isa (Peace Be Upon Him) or the Mahdi (May Allah Be Pleased With Him)?

No, so why should we?
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom