Will China-India border resume peaceful after Biden takes over power from Trump

[Oldman1]

And US learned the lesson not to mess with China in Vietnam, so yes China did won the Korean War we prevented the US to completely occupy the North. Not only that we achieved a victory through the Vietnam War because the US left.

No you didn't win the Korean War because U.S. troops are still there and the objective was to get rid of South Korea which if you haven't notice still exists.

 

[bshifter]

No you didn't win the Korean War because U.S. troops are still there and the objective was to get rid of South Korea which if you haven't notice still exists.

Wrong the objective was to drive the US forces out of the North, that was the objective. This we achieved.
And because of this psychological impact the US did not dare cross the 17th parallel, allowing the Vietnamese kicking the Americans out of the South. Had it not been for China entering the Korean War, US would have easily beaten the Communist Vietnamese and the whole Vietnam would be occupied by US forces.

 

[Place Of Space]

Will China be happy about selling weapons to India right now?

Selling weapons is happy, you know, especially to the budget rich buyer like India.

 

[Oldman1]

Wrong the objective was to drive the US forces out of the North, that was the objective. This we achieved.
And because of this psychological impact the US did not dare cross the 17th parallel, allowing the Vietnamese kicking the Americans out of the South. Had it not been for China entering the Korean War, US would have easily beaten the Communist Vietnamese and the whole Vietnam would be occupied by US forces.

No your objective was to takeover South Korea, even your leader Mao wanted that, but he wanted North Korea to do it, but realize he had to intervene when things didn't go as planned. You guys kept pushing and got Seoul, but lost it after the counterattack, so its not like you decided to stop and pull back.

 

[bshifter]

No your objective was to takeover South Korea, even your leader Mao wanted that, but he wanted North Korea to do it, but realize he had to intervene when things didn't go as planned. You guys kept pushing and got Seoul, but lost it after the counterattack, so its not like you decided to stop and pull back.

Pushing further to the South became the 2nd objective after he saw the success in driving the opponents out. He underestimated the logistic problem. So no our primary objective was achieved and that is pushing the US and UN forces out of the North. After almost 3 years of fighting and it was impossible to achieve he 2nd objective China did successfully force the US to sign the armistice, thus marks the ending of the war. Fighting a primitive China was so scary the US did not dare push further to Northern Vietnam, this is a fact. Now do not tell me that a super power alone could not have easily beaten Northern Vietnam back then. Nobody would believe this crap, the outcome of the Korean War scared the hell out of US so you guys did not go all the way wiping the Vietnamese out

 

[Oldman1]

Pushing further to the South became the 2nd objective after he saw the success in driving the opponents out. He underestimated the logistic problem. So no our primary objective was achieved and that is pushing the US and UN forces out of the North. After almost 3 years of fighting and it was impossible to achieve he 2nd objective China did successfully force the US to sign the armistice, thus marks the ending of the war. Fighting a primitive China was so scary the US did not dare push further to Northern Vietnam, this is a fact. Now do not tell me that a super power alone could not have easily beaten Northern Vietnam back then. Nobody would believe this crap, the outcome of the Korean War scared the hell out of US so you guys did not go all the way wiping the Vietnamese out

No it wasn't a second objective because that was the primary objective in the first place at the start of the war. Pushing the U.S. led military back was the secondary. The counterattack against China pretty much forced China and North Korea to sign the armistice and South Korea still exists which was suppose to be taken over. And you learned your lesson from that war when you invaded Vietnam which has a history of resisting powerful countries. Just like in Afghanistan when they resisted the powerful Soviet Union and the U.S. So imagine how badly China would suffer had they kept fighting in Vietnam. You wouldn't have done any better right?

 

[bshifter]

No it wasn't a second objective because that was the primary objective in the first place at the start of the war. Pushing the U.S. led military back was the secondary. The counterattack against China pretty much forced China and North Korea to sign the armistice and South Korea still exists which was suppose to be taken over. And you learned your lesson from that war when you invaded Vietnam which has a history of resisting powerful countries. Just like in Afghanistan when they resisted the powerful Soviet Union and the U.S. So imagine how badly China would suffer had they kept fighting in Vietnam. You wouldn't have done any better right?

China warned the US not to cross the Yalu river a couple of times before intervening in the war. We conveyed the message through the Indian prime minister since there was no direct communication between PRC and US. The US ignored to its peril. China did not warn the US to leave South Korea. It became a threat to China if US occupies the North. When the US and UN forces started to fight North Korean troops in the South, China did not warn the US, Mao only warned the US after Americans and UN troops pushed all the way close to the Yalu River. So primary objective is kicking you guys out of the North. Just accept it

 

[GHALIB]

Seems you haven't learnt anything from 20 soldiers frozen to death. Your coward army scare to death, dare not to search them, wait until next morning. Do you know they can survive if your coward army save them in time?
No your fake news India media won't tell you truth. India army generals don't have balls.

we killed 43 chinese , that is why you cowards are nit daring to declare your dead because of fear of chances of low moral development .

 

[sinait]

we killed 43 chinese , that is why you cowards are nit daring to declare your dead because of fear of chances of low moral development .

Haha, LOW MUSCLE MASS SUPA POWA INDIANS are so FUNNY.

First learn to climb 6ft walls before go killing, hahaha.

.

 

[Beast]

This is upto China and US. India wanted to make a profit from China-US tensions. US used India's greed and seduced India to mess with China.

China saying US should not interfere doesn't mean China didn't know US was already involved and was the pushing hand behind India. It means the incident would not have happened and would be settled much more easily if it wasn't for US.

More like US make a hefty profit during the tension. Remember India forced to import billions dollars of winter logistics from US to support large army in Ladakh.

we killed 43 chinese , that is why you cowards are nit daring to declare your dead because of fear of chances of low moral development .

Modi beg us not to tell the world Chinese low number of casualty. And he is an obedient slave when he tells congress nobody invade india. India didn't lost an inch of land. Indirectly telling Indian is invaders.

Don't tell me there is a Chinese soldiers behind him pointing gun at his head to utter those words....

 

[kankan326]

Disengagement comes