What's new

Will Adopt ‘Unbiased’ Approach To India’s Move For UN Ban On Jaish: China

this is simpler than all that.

If China does anything differently they will be exposed as aiding and abetting terrorists. Guess they have learnt from Pakistan's experience
 
.
Same goes for india what u doing in afghan and balouch u r doval officially accepted ur terror financing in pak soilgo to youtube see it
Sir, ask anyone from Afghanistan, what we are doing in there, I wont go into details, but lets not kid ourselves who started proxy terror. Doval recently became NSA, what about before Doval and Modi? The only reason you fear him, is because he speaks straight, much like Musharaff. And btw, you too can go in youtube and check Mushraff's interview, so lets not go into tu tu main main.

And what is the implication of that?

Anyway, there is only one thing that matters, I.e. solid evidence/proof to back up your allegations. If you have that, then China or anyone else won't even have the option to block it.

@kadamba-warrior
Sir, even you know, no matter what proof india gives, china wont be backing it up, and why would china even do it. Firstly, pakistan is an ally of her, and not just any ally a perfect ally.
1. Pakistan is giving access to china to middle east.
2. Pakistan buys defence equipments more than any other countries for china.
3. Pakistan keeps check india.
4. In case of any war with china, pakistan can open the other front and help china.
5. Most importantly, pakistan buys stuff from china without any question. Without proper tender, no competition, chinese companies are given full hand in pakistani projects and resources. Pakistan is more like a province for china now.
So, unless pakistan does something totally stupid to screw its relation with china like it did with states about obl, china wont mind anything, and we are ok with it, a stable pakistan is far better than an unstable one.
But please spare the lecture, that you need evidence and this and that.
 
. .
And what is the implication of that?

Anyway, there is only one thing that matters, I.e. solid evidence/proof to back up your allegations. If you have that, then China or anyone else won't even have the option to block it.

@kadamba-warrior

It's pretty obvious. The attacks in pakistan were against military surveillance hardware of both Air Force and the navy. Similarly the attack against India AF base was against its aircrafts too. There is more than meets the eye definitely here.
Whereas The attacks around the world have been against civilians crowded places.

In all aspects, this menace needs to be eradicated. Peace and living rights of human beings have been disputed by these attacks all over the world,
 
.
It's pretty obvious. The attacks in pakistan were against military surveillance hardware of both Air Force and the navy. Similarly the attack against India AF base was against its aircrafts too. There is more than meets the eye definitely here.
Whereas The attacks around the world have been against civilians crowded places.

In all aspects, this menace needs to be eradicated. Peace and living rights of human beings have been disputed by these attacks all over the world,

Thanks for clarifying sir. :cheers:

You're right, the trend of attacking air force bases does seem to be quite different from what is seen elsewhere.
 
.
And just like members have always told here, we dont hate every pakistanis, we hate terrorists emerging from pakistan. If pakistan can control them, you wont see india complaning anymore. We may be enemies, so is china, but lets keep that within borders.
India started it with training of Mukti Bahni in 60s and 70s.
 
.
India started it with training of Mukti Bahni in 60s and 70s.
Sir, with due respect, if you want to look at past, lets go a bit further then. Congress gave Jinnah what he wanted, a separte state, and kashmir became a point of debate for both Congress and Jinnah. India wouldn't even thought of putting army into kashmir, had your people not attacked kashmir and unless asked by maharaja hari singh himself. With the bloody partition and then attack on kashmir, india understood pakistan's intentions. Before Bangladesh became independent, we all know what kind of announcements from east bengal was arising in loudspeakers day after day. If you dont know ask someone from bengal or your old man, and the amount refugees that were fleeing to India from east bengal was massive, infact my own forefathers came at that time, they recall the horrific time during operation searchlight. India had to stop this, in one way or other, just like you are doing with afghanistan, and thus came Mukti Bahini.
NOTE: The funny part is from that day till now, your army is still trying to ape that liberating force strategy in kashmir in hope that they can replicate what india did with them.
P.S : India have long moved on from then, young generation doesn't even know now about mukti bahini and kashmir. Yet your country is stuck with this mindset.No offence but, Look at the mindset of both the countries, while one is striving to become a developed country, getting UNSC seat, the other is still struck in hindu bashing and kashmir.
 
. . .
Sir, there's a famous quote, "you cannot make a person see, if he choose not to"

I have a simpler way of looking at it.

If you don't give me evidence/proof, what makes you different from a conspiracy theorist? Both have no proof, and just want me to believe it because they said so. :P
 
.
I have an easier saying.

If you don't give me evidence/proof, what makes you different from a conspiracy theorist? Both have no proof, and just want me to believe it because they said so. :P
So UN declared Lakvi, jaish-e-mohammad, hafeez sayeed as terrorist are conspiracy theory? hmm nice logic.
 
.
So UN declared Lakvi, jaish-e-mohammad, hafeez sayeed as terrorist are conspiracy theory? hmm nice logic.

If they did, that means there was actual evidence.

So like I said, if you have evidence, you have nothing to worry about. :P

If you don't have enough evidence, you are the same as a conspiracy theorist.
 
.
If they did, that means there was actual evidence.

So like I said, if you have evidence, you have nothing to worry about. :P

If you don't have enough evidence, you are the same as a conspiracy theorist.
We already did, china couldn't do anything about it, thus vetoed, the only option. Anyways, lets not play the quote-quote game further, unless you have something substantial to say rather than parroting the same line. Cheerio
 
.
We already did, china couldn't do anything about it, thus vetoed, the only option. Anyways, lets not play the quote-quote game further, unless you have something substantial to say rather than parroting the same line. Cheerio

Give me a break. :lol:

Indians are crying all day. Just give any evidence you have and leave the rest to us, instead of being constant crybabies.

And don't try to take the moral high ground on terrorism, India was responsible for training the world's first modern terrorist group, the Tamil Tigers.

Hell, India is so proud of terrorism their own defence minister openly boasted about how India uses terrorism as an OFFICIAL state policy:

‘You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only,’ says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar | The Indian Express

The only country in the world to boast of using terrorists as an official state policy.
 
.
hilarious , as the title is , unbiased approach of china , too biased approach se kya okard liya chin ne ? kamzor dost se takatwar dushman zyada fayedemand hota hai ,chin ko samaj me aa jayega eek din ., as there is an old saying in punjabi , banda puchada nayi kolo , nai nai mere baal kinne lambe hain , nayi bolda , puttar kat reha hoon , tere agge hi aa jaan ge .
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom