Patterson was expressing an opinion as well, using your logic.
Don't have an App for Def.pk, using my Samsung captivate to post on the actual site.
Brings me back to the argument of credibility of the person being quoted....
Patterson is an ambassador expressing her concern based on intel and other sources at her disposal....
The UAE official is unidentified, his position has not been released... I also refuse to believe that the official is privy to the level of info say a US ambassador to Pak is privy to....Being closer to ground zero is another advantage of the same....
Of course I consider Patterson more credible as will a majority of people...
Anyways....we can keep going on in circles....the point I was making was that even if UAE believes that we are supporting TTP, their stance towards support for India has not changed.....
Though the negative relationship between US and Pak is obviously due to such revelations about Pakistan that the local US diplomats encounter from time to time
Even if we assume that the Wikileaks are not "proof", I do think that this affects Pak a lot more considering your allies are dubious of your activities while UAEs opinion of Indian activities has not changed their stance towards India.