What's new

Wikileaks docs offer insight into Saudi diplomats’ world

ArsalanKhan21

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
4,006
Reaction score
-2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Wikileaks docs offer insight into Saudi diplomats’ world - The Globe and Mail

Wikileaks docs offer insight into Saudi diplomats’ world
Raphael Satter And Maggie Michael
ISTANBUL — The Associated Press
Published Saturday, Jun. 20, 2015 10:04AM EDT

At the Saudi Embassy in Tehran, diplomats talked about airing the grievances of disenchanted local youth using Facebook and Twitter. At the embassy in Khartoum, they reported anxiously on Iran’s military aid to Sudan.

Meanwhile the Saudi mission in Geneva was stuck dealing with a multi-million dollar limo bill racked up by a Saudi princess and her entourage.

The diplomatic documents published by WikiLeaks Friday are only the first batch of what the transparency group says will be a much larger release, but they’ve already provided an unusual level of insight into the day-to-day of Saudi diplomacy – giving a snapshot of the lavish spending habits of senior royals and the political intrigue percolating across the Middle East.

WikiLeaks has so far published roughly 60,000 documents, of which The Associated Press has only been able to authenticate a handful. But the organization has a long track record of hosting large leaks of government material and insists the latest batch is genuine.

Saudi officials have not explicitly challenged the authenticity of the documents and Saudi diplomats have not answered repeated requests for comment. However, the Foreign Ministry posted a carefully worded message on its Twitter account early Saturday morning, warning citizens to avoid visiting “any website with the aim of getting a document or leaked information that could be untrue and aims to harm the nation.”

Many of the scores of documents reviewed by AP appear aimed at keeping track of Iranian activity across the region or undermining Tehran’s interests. An undated memo apparently sent from the Saudi Embassy in Tehran made note of what it said was the “frustration of the Iranian citizen and his strong desire for regime change” and suggested ways to publicly expose Iran’s social grievances through “the Internet, social media like Facebook and Twitter.” It also suggests “hosting opposition figures overseas, co-ordinating with them and encouraging them to use galleries to show pictures of torture carried by the Iranian regime against people.”

Saudis also kept a watchful eye on Iran’s friends, real or perceived. One 2012 memo warned that Iran was getting “flirting American messages” suggesting that the U.S. had no objections to a peaceful Iranian nuclear program so long as it had guarantees, “possibly Russian ones.”

Another memo, dated to 2012, accuses the United Arab Emirates of helping Russia and Iran circumvent international sanctions. A third memo – marked “top secret” – makes the startling claim that Iranian fighter jets bombed South Sudanese forces during a 2012 standoff over the oil-rich area of Heglig.

There are many such hard-to-confirm stories in the Saudi documents.

One of the most inflammatory memos carries the claim that Gulf countries were prepared to pay $10-billion to secure the freedom of Egypt’s deposed strongman, Hosni Mubarak. The memo, written on a letterhead bearing only a single palm tree and crossed scimitars above the words “top secret,” quotes an unnamed Egyptian official as saying that the Muslim Brotherhood would agree to release Mubarak in exchange for the cash “since the Egyptian people will not benefit from his imprisonment.”

Although the document is undated, the political situation it describes suggests it was drafted in 2012, when the Muslim Brotherhood appeared poised to take power. Senior Brotherhood official Mohammed Morsi served as Egypt’s president from June 2012 to July 2013, before being ousted by the military.

But it’s not clear the idea of paying the Brotherhood to secure Mubarak’s release ever coalesced into a firm offer. A handwritten note at the top left of the document says the ransom “is not a good idea.”

“Even if it is paid the Muslim Brotherhood will not be able to do anything regarding releasing Mubarak,” the unknown author writes. “It seems there are no alternatives for the president but to enter prison.”

Still, the memo’s existence adds credence to the claim made in 2012 by senior Muslim Brotherhood leader Khairat el-Shater that Saudi Arabia had offered billions of dollars in return for Mubarak’s freedom – something Saudi officials hotly denied at the time.

Amid all the intrigue are other insights into Saudi attitudes abroad – especially their taste for luxury.

Amid a small mountain of administrative documents, the AP found a 2009 invoice for an unpaid limousine bill racked up by Princess Maha Al Ibrahim, which Saudi media identify as the wife of senior Saudi royal Abdul-Rahman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. The invoice, from Geneva-based Golden Limousine Services and addressed to the Saudi mission there, says the princess skipped town after failing to paying a first installment of 1.5 million Swiss francs owed to the company and her hotel. When the bill was brought to her attention, “she declared that the amount was too high” and asked diplomats to handle the negotiations over its payment.

When reached by phone on Saturday, Louis Roulet, the administrator of the limousine service, confirmed the document’s authenticity and said he remembered the incident well. The total bill was “far more” than 1.5 million Swiss francs, he said, adding that it was eventually paid in full.

“We don’t work with this family anymore, for the obvious reasons,” Roulet said.

Still, the Algerian-born Roulet was unfazed, saying these kinds of disputes were typical of the Arab customers he dealt with.

“I find this totally normal,” he said.
 
.
saudi ministry of foreign affairs is urging "wise" saudis to ignore the leak lol
 
.
Buying Silence: How the Saudi Foreign Ministry controls Arab media

On Monday, Saudi Arabia celebrated the beheading of its 100th prisoner this year. The story was nowhere to be seen on Arab media despite the story's circulation on wire services. Even international media was relatively mute about this milestone compared to what it might have been if it had concerned a different country. How does a story like this go unnoticed?

Today's release of the WikiLeaks "Saudi Cables" from the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs show how it's done.

The oil-rich Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its ruling family take a systematic approach to maintaining the country's positive image on the international stage. Most world governments engage in PR campaigns to fend off criticism and build relations in influential places. Saudi Arabia controls its image by monitoring media and buying loyalties from Australia to Canada and everywhere in between.

Documents reveal the extensive efforts to monitor and co-opt Arab media, making sure to correct any deviations in regional coverage of Saudi Arabia and Saudi-related matters. Saudi Arabia's strategy for co-opting Arab media takes two forms, corresponding to the "carrot and stick" approach, referred to in the documents as "neutralisation" and "containment". The approach is customised depending on the market and the media in question.

"Contain" and "Neutralise"

The initial reaction to any negative coverage in the regional media is to "neutralise" it. The term is used frequently in the cables and it pertains to individual journalists and media institutions whose silence and co-operation has been bought. "Neutralised" journalists and media institutions are not expected to praise and defend the Kingdom, only to refrain from publishing news that reflects negatively on the Kingdom, or any criticism of its policies. The "containment" approach is used when a more active propaganda effort is required. Journalists and media institutions relied upon for "containment" are expected not only to sing the Kingdom's praises, but to lead attacks on any party that dares to air criticisms of the powerful Gulf state.

One of the ways "neutralisation" and "containment" are ensured is by purchasing hundreds or thousands of subscriptions in targeted publications. These publications are then expected to return the favour by becoming an "asset" in the Kingdom's propaganda strategy. A document listing the subscriptions that needed renewal by 1 January 2010 details a series of contributory sums meant for two dozen publications in Damascus, Abu Dhabi, Beirut, Kuwait, Amman and Nouakchott. The sums range from $500 to 9,750 Kuwaiti Dinars ($33,000). The Kingdom effectively buys reverse "shares" in the media outlets, where the cash "dividends" flow the opposite way, from the shareholder to the media outlet. In return Saudi Arabia gets political "dividends" – an obliging press.

An example of these co-optive practices in action can be seen in an exchange between the Saudi Foreign Ministry and its Embassy in Cairo. On 24 November 2011 Egypt's Arabic-language broadcast station ONTV hosted the Saudi opposition figure Saad al-Faqih, which prompted the Foreign Ministry to task the embassy with inquiring into the channel. The Ministry asked the embassy to find out how "to co-opt it or else we must consider it standing in the line opposed to the Kingdom's policies".

The document reports that the billionaire owner of the station, Naguib Sawiris, did not want to be "opposed to the Kingdom's policies" and that he scolded the channel director, asking him "never to host al-Faqih again". He also asked the Ambassador if he'd like to be "a guest on the show".

The Saudi Cables are rife with similar examples, some detailing the figures and the methods of payment. These range from small but vital sums of around $2000/year to developing country media outlets – a figure the Guinean News Agency "urgently needs" as "it would solve many problems that the agency is facing" – to millions of dollars, as in the case of Lebanese right-wing television station MTV.

Confrontation
The "neutralisation" and "containment" approaches are not the only techniques the Saudi Ministry is willing to employ. In cases where "containment" fails to produce the desired effect, the Kingdom moves on to confrontation. In one example, the Foreign Minister was following a Royal Decree dated 20 January 2010 to remove Iran’s new Arabic-language news network, Al-Alam, from the main Riyadh-based regional communications satellite operator, Arabsat. After the plan failed, Saud Al Faisal sought to "weaken its broadcast signal".

The documents show concerns within the Saudi administration over the social upheavals of 2011, which became known in the international media as the "Arab Spring". The cables note with concern that after the fall of Mubarak, coverage of the upheavals in Egyptian media was "being driven by public opinion instead of driving public opinion". The Ministry resolved "to give financial support to influential media institutions inTunisia", the birthplace of the “Arab Spring”.

The cables reveal that the government employs a different approach for its own domestic media. There, a wave of the Royal hand is all that is required to adjust the output of state-controlled media. A complaint from former Lebanese Prime Minister and Saudi citizen Saad Hariri concerning articles critical of him in the Saudi-owned Al-Hayat and Asharq Al-Awsat newspapers prompted a directive to "stop these type of articles" from the Foreign Ministry.

This is a general overview of the Saudi Foreign Ministry’s strategy in dealing with the media. WikiLeaks' Saudi Cables contain numerous other examples that form an indictment of both the Kingdom and the state of the media globally.


 
.
Buying Silence: How the Saudi Foreign Ministry controls Arab media

On Monday, Saudi Arabia celebrated the beheading of its 100th prisoner this year. The story was nowhere to be seen on Arab media despite the story's circulation on wire services. Even international media was relatively mute about this milestone compared to what it might have been if it had concerned a different country. How does a story like this go unnoticed?

Today's release of the WikiLeaks "Saudi Cables" from the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs show how it's done.

The oil-rich Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its ruling family take a systematic approach to maintaining the country's positive image on the international stage. Most world governments engage in PR campaigns to fend off criticism and build relations in influential places. Saudi Arabia controls its image by monitoring media and buying loyalties from Australia to Canada and everywhere in between.

Documents reveal the extensive efforts to monitor and co-opt Arab media, making sure to correct any deviations in regional coverage of Saudi Arabia and Saudi-related matters. Saudi Arabia's strategy for co-opting Arab media takes two forms, corresponding to the "carrot and stick" approach, referred to in the documents as "neutralisation" and "containment". The approach is customised depending on the market and the media in question.

"Contain" and "Neutralise"

The initial reaction to any negative coverage in the regional media is to "neutralise" it. The term is used frequently in the cables and it pertains to individual journalists and media institutions whose silence and co-operation has been bought. "Neutralised" journalists and media institutions are not expected to praise and defend the Kingdom, only to refrain from publishing news that reflects negatively on the Kingdom, or any criticism of its policies. The "containment" approach is used when a more active propaganda effort is required. Journalists and media institutions relied upon for "containment" are expected not only to sing the Kingdom's praises, but to lead attacks on any party that dares to air criticisms of the powerful Gulf state.

One of the ways "neutralisation" and "containment" are ensured is by purchasing hundreds or thousands of subscriptions in targeted publications. These publications are then expected to return the favour by becoming an "asset" in the Kingdom's propaganda strategy. A document listing the subscriptions that needed renewal by 1 January 2010 details a series of contributory sums meant for two dozen publications in Damascus, Abu Dhabi, Beirut, Kuwait, Amman and Nouakchott. The sums range from $500 to 9,750 Kuwaiti Dinars ($33,000). The Kingdom effectively buys reverse "shares" in the media outlets, where the cash "dividends" flow the opposite way, from the shareholder to the media outlet. In return Saudi Arabia gets political "dividends" – an obliging press.

An example of these co-optive practices in action can be seen in an exchange between the Saudi Foreign Ministry and its Embassy in Cairo. On 24 November 2011 Egypt's Arabic-language broadcast station ONTV hosted the Saudi opposition figure Saad al-Faqih, which prompted the Foreign Ministry to task the embassy with inquiring into the channel. The Ministry asked the embassy to find out how "to co-opt it or else we must consider it standing in the line opposed to the Kingdom's policies".

The document reports that the billionaire owner of the station, Naguib Sawiris, did not want to be "opposed to the Kingdom's policies" and that he scolded the channel director, asking him "never to host al-Faqih again". He also asked the Ambassador if he'd like to be "a guest on the show".

The Saudi Cables are rife with similar examples, some detailing the figures and the methods of payment. These range from small but vital sums of around $2000/year to developing country media outlets – a figure the Guinean News Agency "urgently needs" as "it would solve many problems that the agency is facing" – to millions of dollars, as in the case of Lebanese right-wing television station MTV.

Confrontation
The "neutralisation" and "containment" approaches are not the only techniques the Saudi Ministry is willing to employ. In cases where "containment" fails to produce the desired effect, the Kingdom moves on to confrontation. In one example, the Foreign Minister was following a Royal Decree dated 20 January 2010 to remove Iran’s new Arabic-language news network, Al-Alam, from the main Riyadh-based regional communications satellite operator, Arabsat. After the plan failed, Saud Al Faisal sought to "weaken its broadcast signal".

The documents show concerns within the Saudi administration over the social upheavals of 2011, which became known in the international media as the "Arab Spring". The cables note with concern that after the fall of Mubarak, coverage of the upheavals in Egyptian media was "being driven by public opinion instead of driving public opinion". The Ministry resolved "to give financial support to influential media institutions inTunisia", the birthplace of the “Arab Spring”.

The cables reveal that the government employs a different approach for its own domestic media. There, a wave of the Royal hand is all that is required to adjust the output of state-controlled media. A complaint from former Lebanese Prime Minister and Saudi citizen Saad Hariri concerning articles critical of him in the Saudi-owned Al-Hayat and Asharq Al-Awsat newspapers prompted a directive to "stop these type of articles" from the Foreign Ministry.

This is a general overview of the Saudi Foreign Ministry’s strategy in dealing with the media. WikiLeaks' Saudi Cables contain numerous other examples that form an indictment of both the Kingdom and the state of the media globally.


Actually yes, Saudi Arabia largely controls Arab media. That's a fact. Another fact is that there is no media outlet that doesn't follow their patrons' interests, there is none. Therefore, there is nothing strange of Saudi Arabia controlling Arab media, and yet representing Arab interests. We're glad with that.

saudi ministry of foreign affairs is urging "wise" saudis to ignore the leak lol

And what would you urge your Iranian brothers about Iranian WikiLeaks documents?
 
.
Actually yes, Saudi Arabia largely controls Arab media. That's a fact. Another fact is that there is no media outlet that doesn't follow their patrons' interests, there is none. Therefore, there is nothing strange of Saudi Arabia controlling Arab media, and yet representing Arab interests. We're glad with that.

It's good that you reaffirm your submission to your Saudi brothers, not that we didn't know that. But the article was about something else, how Saudis tried to bribe others to show a positive image from Saudis and to filter all the negative news.
 
.
It's good that you reaffirm your submission to your Saudi brothers, not that we didn't know that. But the article was about something else, how Saudis tried to bribe others to show a positive image from Saudis and to filter all the negative news.
Submission? Buddy you get things very wrong here. Defending Arab people and Arab nations is sth brings us pride. It's well known that Arabs want unity, let alone having effective media outlets to defend their interests. Saudi Arabia is the cradle of Islam and Arabs, it's a pillar in the Arab world. Yet it's interests are ours and it's enemies are ours.

Rather than being silly by denouncing Arabs being loyal to Arabs, you should look at the Shiite "Arabs" who follow the interests of our enemy Iran. That's what we should stop at and denounce.
 
.
Submission? Buddy you get things very wrong here. Defending Arab people and Arab nations is sth brings us pride. It's well known that Arabs want unity, let alone having effective media outlets to defend their interests. Saudi Arabia is the cradle of Islam and Arabs, it's a pillar in the Arab world. Yet it's interests are ours and it's enemies are ours.

Rather than being silly by denouncing Arabs being loyal to Arabs, you should look at the Shiite "Arabs" who follow the interests of our enemy Iran. That's what we should stop at and denounce.
Since when Arabs should only support Arabs, as in the racial context? Is that all Islam taught you? That Arabs should matter only for Arabs? If an Arab supports a non Arab, then he is a traitor? God, I'm no wrong, you people are exactly the same as you where 1400 years ago, the same ones wandering in deserts back then, only attired in modernity cover. The same mentality of beduin Arabs before Islam who buried their girls alive only for being girls.
 
.
I read a lot of of the documents, especially stuff concerning Iran and Egypt, and the more I read the more it reaffirmed my belief that the Iranian regime is your run of the mill Mafia-like organization, and that the main reason Saudi Arabia weren't buying the Egyptian revolution is because of the Iranian infiltration that followed (one document showing a "message" sent from a group of Egyptian media personals revealing that a lot of them were contacted by Iranian groups and that they were trying to buy them off).

Since when Arabs should only support Arabs, as in the racial context? Is that all Islam taught you? That Arabs should matter only for Arabs? If an Arab supports a non Arab, then he is a traitor? God, I'm no wrong, you people are exactly the same as you where 1400 years ago, the same ones wandering in deserts back then, only attired in modernity cover. The same mentality of beduin Arabs before Islam who buried their girls alive only for being girls.
Being an Arab is more than just a race. It's a complicated term that includes a shared language, heritage, and ethnic identity. And yes our interests, as Arabs, are aligned most of the time, and from our history, it's rarely intertwined with Persian interests.
 
.
I read a lot of of the documents, especially stuff concerning Iran and Egypt, and the more I read the more it reaffirmed my belief that the Iranian regime is your run of the mill Mafia-like organization, and that the main reason Saudi Arabia weren't buying the Egyptian revolution is because of the Iranian infiltration that followed (one document showing a "message" sent from a group of Egyptian media personals revealing that a lot of them were contacted by Iranian groups and that they were trying to buy them off).


Being an Arab is more than just a race. It's a complicated term that includes a shared language, heritage, and ethnic identity. And yes our interests, as Arabs, are aligned most of the time, and from our history, it's rarely intertwined with Persian interests.
That's not true. In the Arab-Israeli wars you had Egyptians, Jordanians and Syrians backstabbing each other even though they faced a common enemy.
 
.
Egypt has self-prostituted for Saudi money while Pakistan refused.

Saudi Arabia tells citizens to ignore latest WikiLeaks release | World news | The Guardian

Saudi Arabia tells citizens to ignore latest WikiLeaks release
61,000 leaked cables give rare insight into kingdom’s habit of buying influence and monitoring dissidents
Ian Black Middle East editor
@ian_black
Sunday 21 June 2015 16.08 BST Last modified on Sunday 21 June 2015 19.39 BST

Saudi Arabia
has warned its citizens to ignore thousands of its diplomatic documents leaked by the transparency site WikiLeaks, which give a rare insight into the kingdom’s habit of buying influence and monitoring dissidents.

The 61,000 Saudi cables, the first tranche of 500,000 promised by Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, also show the country’s sharp focus on its strategic rival Iran and the revolution in Egypt, and support for allies and clients in Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Nothing yet published matches embarrassing revelations about the Saudis in WikiLeaks’ 2010 release of US diplomatic documents, which reported King Abdullah calling to “cut off the head of the [Iranian] snake” as well as drink- and drug-fuelled partying by minor royals in Jeddah.

But routine secret correspondence from the foreign ministry in Riyadh and embassies abroad, some from as recently as April this year, catalogues many of the preoccupations of the conservative monarchy, the world’s biggest oil exporter, especially during the turbulent period of the Arab spring from early 2011.

According to one document, Gulf states were prepared to pay $10bn (£6.3bn) to secure the release of the deposed Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, which appears to support a previous claim about this by a leading Muslim Brotherhood politician.

A 2012 cable reveals concern that Iran was receiving “flirting American messages” that suggested the US did not oppose a peaceful Iranian nuclear programme so long as it had guarantees, including from Russia. Others from that period show Saudi plans for an anti-Iran satellite TV channel to broadcast in Persian from Bahrain, and plans to disrupt Iranian channels.

The cables show Riyadh often seems worried about any advantage for Tehran: one document explains that if an Arab summit conference were held as scheduled in Baghdad in 2012, it would mean “handing Iraq to Iran”. Cables also show efforts to back opponents of Nouri al-Maliki, the then Shia prime minister of Iraq, who was close to Iran.

Correspondence from the embassy in Beirut shows contacts with the Lebanese Forces leader, Samir Geagea, over cash payments to ease financial problems. Geagea had publicly defended Saudi Arabia and opposed president Bashar al-Assad of Syria, and generally shown “readiness to do whatever the kingdom asks of him”, the cables say.

Al-Akhbar, the Beirut newspaper that is publishing the documents with WikiLeaks, is a supporter of Assad and Iran’s Lebanese militia ally Hezbollah. The documents examined so far do not mention Saudi backing for anti-Assad rebels, most likely because these are handled by the country’s intelligence service.

Correspondence from the Saudi embassy in London shows filming of protesters and a discussion of legal action against the Guardian over an article by Saad al-Faqih, an Islamist. An appearance by Faqih on Egypt’s ON TV channel brought a proposal to “find out how to co-opt it”. But the billionaire owner of the station, Naguib Sawiris, did not want to be “opposed to the kingdom’s policies” and he ordered that Faqih never be interviewed again.

“The extent of Egypt’s ruling establishment’s self-prostitution to Saudi money is both embarrassing and unsurprising,” commented the writer Iyad al-Baghdadi, in one of many weekend social media reactions since the documents were released. Ala’a Shehabi, a Bahraini dissident concerned by the Saudi intervention in her country, called the trove a “rare insight into the most opaque regime in the world”.

Toby Matthiesen, a Cambridge University academic, said: “For Saudi experts there is little surprising so far … but the details will hurt a lot of corrupt people.”

The documents include several references to “hostile” media. An undated note describes the influence of journalists sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood on the Qatar-owned channel al-Jazeera, which has often fallen foul of the Saudis. The papers also show how in 2010 they purchased hundreds or thousands of subscriptions to publications in Damascus, Abu Dhabi, Beirut, Kuwait, Jordan and Mauritania in order to secure favourable coverage.

Influence and money are recurring themes. Reports from Sana’a state that the proceeds of the sale of 3m barrels of oil given to Yemen in 2012 never reached the country’s treasury. Another document accuses Qatar of paying a Yemeni sheikh to foment rebellion in the army and to prevent the 2012 presidential election of Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi.

The Sydney Morning Herald found documents with instructions from the Saudi government to its Canberra embassy relating to the payment of large subsidies to prominent Arabic newspapers and media organisations in Australia.

The Sunday Times reported that a document in the cache showed Saudi Arabia was prepared to pay the BBC correspondent Frank Gardner £1m in compensation after he was shot in Riyadh by al-Qaida. Gardner told the newspaper the compensation never materialised.

On Sunday the Saudi foreign ministry spokesman Osama Nugali warned citizens not to “allow enemies of the state to achieve their intentions in regards to exchanging or publishing any documents,” many of which, he said, had been “fabricated in a very obvious manner”.

WikiLeaks did not say where it obtained the documents, but it referred in a press release to Riyadh’s statement in May that it had suffered a breach of its computer networks – an attack later claimed by a group calling itself the Yemen Cyber Army.

The Guardian has not been able to independently verify the authenticity of the documents.

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
 
.
Here's a direct link to the sowdi cables my friend. Enjoy. Don't lose your head.


wikileaksDOTorgSLASHsaudi-cables/search


I read a lot of of the documents, especially stuff concerning Iran and Egypt, and the more I read the more it reaffirmed my belief that the Iranian regime is your run of the mill Mafia-like organization, and that the main reason Saudi Arabia weren't buying the Egyptian revolution is because of the Iranian infiltration that followed (one document showing a "message" sent from a group of Egyptian media personals revealing that a lot of them were contacted by Iranian groups and that they were trying to buy them off).


Being an Arab is more than just a race. It's a complicated term that includes a shared language, heritage, and ethnic identity. And yes our interests, as Arabs, are aligned most of the time, and from our history, it's rarely intertwined with Persian interests.
 
Last edited:
.
So the sowdi slavers have threatened their servants. I mean paid internet trolls not to make a peep an o it these cables. Or the get 20 years in the dungeons. no wonder everyone of these paid trolls are to scared to even make a peep in this thread. Now I understand why they are pumping those stupid pro Arabian nonsensical threads. Mile high tower. Marine world. Wealth fund. Like anyone really cares.


Your silence is worth more than a thousand words.
 
.
have you read the Wikileaks cables yet? Of course not. That would take a spine. Free will and a functioning brain. Much better to talk about masturbation.


Lol you're pathetic, have you finished masturbating to these BS articles? cuz no one gives a damn here.
 
.
500, 000 release cables boy ! and this is the best advice the lizard eaters can say? Saudi princess wasting $1.5 million of state money on limo expenses yet saudi clerics keep their mouths shut. Qatar spending $250 million to undermine saudi royals in yemen and this is just the tip of the ice berg. So what are you blabbering about, is changing the subject the only thing you can do defend some medieval family who's grasping at any straws preventing people from reading dark and revealing secrets? You can't dare say a bad word about your fat midget traitor king who was shaking bibi hands whilst your pilot had a starring role in a ISIS torture video.

Spare us your useless garbage ya opium smoker, maybe you should first tend to your Wali Faqih lifestyle in Iran while the rest of the population there are starving and standing in the long bread lines, at least in the GCC most people have a decent life unlike the people living in dirt poor ghettos all over Iran while your Khamenei enjoys his western style life and dumps their money in supporting genocidel leadrs and terror plots all over the middle east



 
.
Here's a nice gift for you short pants. Hopeful k y your paymasters won't mind

wikileaksDOTorgSLASHsaudi-cables/press




Spare us your useless garbage ya opium smoker, maybe you should first tend to your Wali Faqih lifestyle in Iran while the rest of the population there are starving and standing in the long bread lines, at least in the GCC most people have a decent life unlike the people living in dirt poor ghettos all over Iran while your Khamenei enjoys his western style life and dumps their money in supporting genocidel leadrs and terror plots all over the middle east



 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom