What's new

Wikileaks Diplomatic Cables

First Cache of wiki leaks is all Music India ears.

In one, King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa inquires from US interlocutors about the extent of India's involvement in Afghanistan and notes that Bahrain sees India as very positive force in the region. "It's a new era," he says. "They can be of great help."

In another document, UAE's crown prince Mohammed Bin Zayed, referred to as MBZ in the cables, supports the US decision to sell F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan arguing that it would not tilt the balance of power, and even if it did, "India's strength as a stable democracy would ensure that it would not ever be in as 'risky' a situation as its neighbor."

Piero Fassino, head of the foreign policy department of the opposition Partito Democratico's (PD) tells his US interlocutors that the greatest risk with nuclear proliferation is that irresponsible governments like the one in Iran could gain access to nuclear arms, and adds that the "PD assessed that there was little to fear with nations such as India, Britain, and France having nuclear weapons."

In another cable, former Austrian Ambassador to Tehran Michael Postl tells his US interlocutors that that the US should not shy away from interviews with Iranian media outlets. In fact, the US diplomat who sent the cable notes, "a program built around broadcasting the differing opinions of the US, India ('because its opinion is well-respected given its influence as a leader in the non-aligned movement'), and Iran might be a useful way to get our messages across while counteracting perceptions of bias.
 
Last edited:
aabd6249e61d1.jpg


Qaddafi's Ukrainian nurse:
 
As much as I despise Mr. 10%, I don't agree. Military dictatorship, regardless of the capability of the leadership, was more of an obstacle to Pak progress than democracy under Zardari. The difference has to do with the consensus-type politics of the military. Without civilian leadership, this automatically favors conservatism and inflexibility. Decisive political decisions that could cause division within the ranks were impossible, so a sustained offensive against terrorist elements (which carried the possibility of career failure for the officers involved, if unsuccessful) was out of the question until Zardari arrived on the scene.

I translate that as suicidal wars for the advancement of American imperial goals in Asian region was impossible under qualified military regime while the money greedy zardari is willing to sell anything and everything for a price. Seriously the much propagated Pakistani dictatorship wasn't all that undemocratic once mushraff stepped down as army chief.

First Cache of wiki leaks is all Music India ears.

Provided the leaks have an element of truth..so far they are just psy-op operations to set the stage for division between Pakistan and its allies..setting the smaller GCC countries in a "pro-indian" lime light and causing a major uproar in three powerful islamic block countries ie: Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia...

stage is being set for future wars in the muslim world..WOT can rightfully be called war against islam.
 
never forget wikileaks only gives informations which are not sensitive
all the informations between allies of US, we won't be able to see because they don't use these canal of communication

wikileaks is just an apparent easy talking part of the whole
(sorry if my english is not clear, i mean when they use these communications it is not so important that they care about security)
 
Wikileaks is just an evidence how US intelligence fool its decision makers and public by acting as double agents to India.

It also exposed the puppets of network working for the larger interest of India.

Wikileaks totally missed the RAW's association with TTP, ANP, and Bugti's son.

Most interesting part is whole wikileaks proves that US personally have no objection to Iran's nuclear development. While it is Arabs who are forcing him to act against Iran.

Well.... i'm not sure about other's but i will not swallow this pill of weired assumption.
IMO.... wikileaks actually put Iran in suspicious position... looking at his open co-operation with US in wars against Iraq and Afghanistan.

We all know recently Hamid Karzai have accepted that he has taken cash from Iran upon advise of Bush which was used to disperse to unknown contractors. (TTP)
 
Last edited:
WikiLeaks: No chance for IPI pipeline

A U.S. diplomat, whose name was redacted, was quoted by WikiLeaks as saying at a 2009 energy summit in Azerbaijan that it was "very unlikely" the gas pipeline would move forward, noting "the Pakistanis don't have the money to pay for either the pipeline, or the gas," the Press Trust of India said, quoting the watchdog.
 
Wikileaks is just an evidence how US intelligence fool its decision makers and public by acting as double agents to India.

It also exposed the puppets of network working for the larger interest of India.

Wikileaks totally missed the RAW's association with TTP, ANP, and Bugti's son.

RAW is nthing,so y they will waste time on it.but pakistan have every thing to get listed:agree:
 
Did anyone noticed this oxymoron ? :lol:


UAE's crown prince Mohammed Bin Zayed..

"India's strength as a stable democracy would ensure that it would not ever be in as 'risky' a situation as its neighbor." :toast_sign:
 
who care for these kings,they are self red handed.they finance the al qaeda and comment on others.they are american stooges.
 
who care for these kings,they are self red handed.they finance the al qaeda and comment on others.they are american stooges.

They finance al-qaeeda and than round them up :hitwall:

Only friendly state of TTP and Al-Qaeeda is India.
 
ALLAH, aapko TATA ka status, AMBANI ki daulat, VAJPAYEE ka dhiraj,LADEN ki himmat, BUSH ki taqat, aur BILLGATE ki income de, AMEEN
 
Most interesting part is whole wikileaks proves that US personally have no objection to Iran's nuclear development. While it is Arabs who are forcing him to act against Iran.

That is the stage being set to attack Iran. America wants to show it as a Arab Vs Persian or Sunni vs Shia conflict while attempting to keep its own hands clean..also Americans much tarnished reputation in the Muslim world need an uplifting and nothing would deliver it as fast as pitting majority Muslim sect (sunni) against a rival (shia) but minority one.. remember how Islam was pitted against communism to justify wars against soviet union..nothing bothers an enemy more than unity..more importantly Muslim unity..remember America has been the atomic force in keeping arab vs persian and sunni vs shia conflict alive to advance its own imperial goals..First it was shah against the arabs, then Saddam against the Persians, then shia vs sunnis then taliban vs northern alliance..the cycle never stops but we are too ignorant to connect the dots..
 
Saudi King on a roll here...I thought he was sympathetic to Guantánamo detainees?

During a March 2009 visit to Riyadh by John Brennan, President Barack Obama's chief counterterrorism adviser, King Abdullah bin Abdelaziz al-Saud proposes a slightly unorthodox idea to help track detainees released from the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay: implant the men with electronic chips like the kind that the Saudi ruler uses to track his prized pets.

"This was done with horses and falcons, the King said. Brennan replied, 'horses don't have good lawyers,' and that such a proposal would face legal hurdles in the U.S.," according to the cable.

Leaks Show Arabs Leaders Hawkish on Iran - WSJ.com
 
WIKILEAKS:Zardari is bad but not dangerous,Nawaz sharif is not bad but dangerous....:blink:.:woot:
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom