Why Whites, not Chinese, dominated the world despite inventions

[faithfulguy]

Again, you are showing yourself to be a proud functional illiterate.

I never doubted that the concept of zero was invented by Indians.... Only that they weren't you Australoid brownskin Indians.



Wow, is there a single Indian on this planet who isn't functionally illiterate?

There are 4 different theories as to what happened. ALL of them posit that the native Indians were displaced. Not a single one denies this.



Almost everyone on Earth respects Pakistanis more than Indians. After all of the revisionist history you posted, the White slaves, all of your BS in Western countries... wow man, you are the world's most hated people.

Even though the Africans are less intelligent, they at least have SOME self-dignity, a little self-worth.

The Indians are proud that English link their country together. They gladly accept what the British left for them and take it in as their heritage. The blacks in America struggled for freedom and then equality. if it were Indians in the US being slaves, they would fight each other for the rights of being the house hold slave and oppress their fellow Indian slaves that work in the field instead of fighting for freedom.

 

[WhiteMansBurden]

The Indians are proud that English link their country together. They gladly accept what the British left for them and take it in as their heritage. The blacks in America struggled for freedom and then equality. if it were Indians in the US being slaves, they would fight each other for the rights of being the house hold slave and oppress their fellow Indian slaves that work in the field instead of fighting for freedom.

I agree. Blacks have far more self-respect for their own people than Indians ever will.

I'm guessing that they have some serious personality disorders because of all the cultures that have dominated and converted them. The Indo-Aryans branched off of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, and basically created Indian culture, tradition, and religion.

It wasn't until very recently that genetic and archaeological data had confirmed this. So the Indians just recently realized they don't even have an indigenous culture.

In addition, 4,000 years later, some of the descendants of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, located on a tiny island by the name of Britain, established a foothold on the Indian subcontinent and re-converted them to the updated Indo-European culture.

Y'see, the Indians, after thousands of years, had still latched onto our ancient culture, with barely a modification. They were intellectually incapable of advancing the culture beyond the limits my European ancestors had pushed them to. When the British arrived, they changed all of that by.... "updating"... if you will, the software. So, the Indians had a new and updated culture, again provided to them by the European people.

To this very day they live in both worlds, one side sucking on the teet of British culture, language, and religion, and the other of the Hindu tradition that the British peoples' ancestors had created!

 

[Yabgu]

I agree. Blacks have far more self-respect for their own people than Indians ever will.

I'm guessing that they have some serious personality disorders because of all the cultures that have dominated and converted them. The Indo-Aryans branched off of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, and basically created Indian culture, tradition, and religion.

It wasn't until very recently that genetic and archaeological data had confirmed this. So the Indians just recently realized they don't even have an indigenous culture.

In addition, 4,000 years later, some of the descendants of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, located on a tiny island by the name of Britain, established a foothold on the Indian subcontinent and re-converted them to the updated Indo-European culture.

Y'see, the Indians, after thousands of years, had still latched onto our ancient culture, with barely a modification. They were intellectually incapable of advancing the culture beyond the limits my European ancestors had pushed them to. When the British arrived, they changed all of that by.... "updating"... if you will, the software. So, the Indians had a new and updated culture, again provided to them by the European people.

To this very day the live in both worlds, one side sucking on the teet of British culture, language, and religion, and the other of the Hindu tradition that the British peoples' ancestors had created!

Some Indians here even starting to claim Mughal Empire as indians, a Turkic empire as Indian lol. Soon I'm waiting for them to say they was not ruled by British but just 'collaborating'.

 

[WhiteMansBurden]

Some Indians here even starting to claim Mughal Empire as indians, a Turkic empire as Indian lol. Soon I'm waiting for them to say they was not ruled by British but just 'collaborating'.

Literally LOL'ed!

I have a big smirk on my face right now; it seems we all know how Indians think!

 

[Alienware]

Literally LOL'ed!

I have a big smirk on my face right now; it seems we all know how Indians think!

The trouble is they don't think. Indians just follow those around them, as is the case, Indian culture is European (both ancient and modern). Who can take India seriously? All they do is whine and moan about China and Pakistan. Its pathetic.

Indians make good curry, but hey, did you know that the modern Indian curry was a British invention? Yes, the British Raj altered Indian cuisine to fit European tastes and their fascination with spices.

 

[WhiteMansBurden]

The trouble is they don't think. Indians just follow those around them, as is the case, Indian culture is European (both ancient and modern). Who can take India seriously? All they do is whine and moan about China and Pakistan. Its pathetic.

Indians make good curry, but hey, did you know that the modern Indian curry was a British invention? Yes, the British Raj altered Indian cuisine to fit European tastes and their fascination with spices.

Didn't know that. I'll be sure to look into it though!

It didn't take me by surprise when I found that there was a plethora of evidence that indicated the Indo-Aryan diffusion into South Asia was not just a cultural one, but a physical one as well.

Seriously, compare and contrast the Indians of today with the "Indians" of the ancient times. How could these people have fallen so unbelievably far?

Well, these questions all disappear when it is realized that the cultural and technological feats of the ancient Indians were accomplished by an entirely different race of people!

 

[faithfulguy]

I agree. Blacks have far more self-respect for their own people than Indians ever will.

I'm guessing that they have some serious personality disorders because of all the cultures that have dominated and converted them. The Indo-Aryans branched off of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, and basically created Indian culture, tradition, and religion.

It wasn't until very recently that genetic and archaeological data had confirmed this. So the Indians just recently realized they don't even have an indigenous culture.

In addition, 4,000 years later, some of the descendants of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, located on a tiny island by the name of Britain, established a foothold on the Indian subcontinent and re-converted them to the updated Indo-European culture.

Y'see, the Indians, after thousands of years, had still latched onto our ancient culture, with barely a modification. They were intellectually incapable of advancing the culture beyond the limits my European ancestors had pushed them to. When the British arrived, they changed all of that by.... "updating"... if you will, the software. So, the Indians had a new and updated culture, again provided to them by the European people.

To this very day they live in both worlds, one side sucking on the teet of British culture, language, and religion, and the other of the Hindu tradition that the British peoples' ancestors had created!

I guess the Indians practice one drop theory. As long as they have a drop of Indo-European blood in them, they regard themselves as white.

 

[Arya Desa]

Some Indians here even starting to claim Mughal Empire as indians, a Turkic empire as Indian lol. Soon I'm waiting for them to say they was not ruled by British but just 'collaborating'.

Wrong. Central Asian blood, turkish name but PERSIAN Culture. They were Persian.

 

[gambit]

I guess the Indians practice one drop theory. As long as they have a drop of Indo-European blood in them, they regard themselves as white.

So do the white supremacists. As long as there is one drop of black blood in a white supremacist's ancestry, his entire family line is considered black. Or Jewish or Asian.

Here is one example...

Black Ancestry, White Supremacist Confederate Officer :: racismreview.com

The great, sad, and sick irony about Colonel Gibson’s extremely racist view of the racial hierarchy and white supremacy was that he himself was the descendant of a free black man named Gideon Gibson who came to the South Carolina colony in the 1730s. Because he had married a white woman and had been a landowner in another colony, Gideon Gibson was granted substantial land in expanding South Carolina and eventually became a well-off planter and slaveholder there. This worked out because before the Civil War, as Sharfstein notes,

Most Southern states followed a one-quarter or one-eighth rule: anyone with a black grandparent or great-grandparent was legally black, and those with more remote ancestry were legally white.

As the Gibson’s descendants moved west and thrived in Louisiana, their African origins got “watered down” by more marriages and interactions with whites, and forgotten or hidden, and soon the descendant of a black man, Randall Gibson, became a raving white supremacist and Confederate Officer. This probably happened dozens if not hundreds of times over slavery’s centuries.

This is a clear example not only of how “race” is socially and societally constructed, but also of how powerful the age-old white racial frame is.

Take note of the highlighted.

Supposedly, Randall Lee Gibson's ancestor was a free black named Gideon Gibson, a clearly 'white' name, who married a white woman. Through successive interracial marriages, we can assume that RLG himself no longer have any noticeable 'black' physical attributes so he can pass himself off as a white. RLG himself then became a raving racist lunatic. Is it because he knew of his ancestry and ashamed of it and had to act that way to hide his lineage? Possibly and probably.

The key point is this...If one entity, like a government, can arbitrarily decide who is what, another entity like an individual can disagree and set his own arbitrary standard. There is an on going conflict inside the white supremacist community over this issue. Mock the Indians over this, and you just mocked your fellow racist.

 

[WhiteMansBurden]

So do the white supremacists. As long as there is one drop of black blood in a white supremacist's ancestry, his entire family line is considered black. Or Jewish or Asian.

Here is one example...

Black Ancestry, White Supremacist Confederate Officer :: racismreview.com

Take note of the highlighted.

Supposedly, Randall Lee Gibson's ancestor was a free black named Gideon Gibson, a clearly 'white' name, who married a white woman. Through successive interracial marriages, we can assume that RLG himself no longer have any noticeable 'black' physical attributes so he can pass himself off as a white. RLG himself then became a raving racist lunatic. Is it because he knew of his ancestry and ashamed of it and had to act that way to hide his lineage? Possibly and probably.

The key point is this...If one entity, like a government, can arbitrarily decide who is what, another entity like an individual can disagree and set his own arbitrary standard. There is an on going conflict inside the white supremacist community over this issue. Mock the Indians over this, and you just mocked your fellow racist.

There is no conflict. If you're 90% White, and 10% Black, what does that make you? 9/10th White and 1/10th Black.

Easy as that.

 

[gambit]

There is no conflict. If you're 90% White, and 10% Black, what does that make you? 9/10th White and 1/10th Black.

Easy as that.

If there is no conflict, then your despicable kind would not exist. It would not matter a person's skin color or facial features, of which your kind always uses to arbitrarily determine who is inferior or superior.

Genome Biology | Full text | Characterizing the admixed African ancestry of African Americans

The bottom line in the above scientific analysis is that most of the forcibly imported blacks, aka slavery, into the Americas went to South America and that blacks in the US is about 1/4 white in ancestry, give or take a couple percentage points here and there. That is what YOU do not like because now there is a potential in YOUR lineage that there is a black or Jewish ancestor somewhere. Your kind do not like the kind of details you tried to posit as 'no conflict'. You prefer to describe yourselves as either or. White or Black.

 

[faithfulguy]

So do the white supremacists. As long as there is one drop of black blood in a white supremacist's ancestry, his entire family line is considered black. Or Jewish or Asian.

Here is one example...

Black Ancestry, White Supremacist Confederate Officer :: racismreview.com

Take note of the highlighted.

Supposedly, Randall Lee Gibson's ancestor was a free black named Gideon Gibson, a clearly 'white' name, who married a white woman. Through successive interracial marriages, we can assume that RLG himself no longer have any noticeable 'black' physical attributes so he can pass himself off as a white. RLG himself then became a raving racist lunatic. Is it because he knew of his ancestry and ashamed of it and had to act that way to hide his lineage? Possibly and probably.

The key point is this...If one entity, like a government, can arbitrarily decide who is what, another entity like an individual can disagree and set his own arbitrary standard. There is an on going conflict inside the white supremacist community over this issue. Mock the Indians over this, and you just mocked your fellow racist.

First of all, you need to watch the India superpower 2030 video to determine who is the real racist. I'm all for judging people by the content of the character. But its today's black racists that state that because my child is an Asian, a black child with far lower GPA would be accepted over my child. That is racism against Asians as neither me nor my child nor my ancestors never done anything to oppress others. Also, the white people today in America, even the southern whites, should not pay for the deeds of their ancestors.

I'm still waiting for the day of Martin Luther King Jr, that we are judge by the content of our character instead of color of our skin.

 

[Yabgu]

Wrong. Central Asian blood, turkish name but PERSIAN Culture. They were Persian.

What is central Asian blood lol? Is there a regions blood? So Timur who killed more Persians than any other after mongols is Persian? The guy hated Persian to the blood and you say Persian lol. Just because I said something against indians don't cry and change facts.

 

[Arya Desa]

What is central Asian blood lol? Is there a regions blood? So Timur who killed more Persians than any other after mongols is Persian? The guy hated Persian to the blood and you say Persian lol. Just because I said something against indians don't cry and change facts.

Then why did he adopt Persian customs and their language? Why are the kings called Shahs? Because he had no culture of his own and had to adopt Persian culture. Don't get so angry turk when you are confronted with the truth.

First of all, you need to watch the India superpower 2030 video to determine who is the real racist. I'm all for judging people by the content of the character. But its today's black racists that state that because my child is an Asian, a black child with far lower GPA would be accepted over my child. That is racism against Asians as neither me nor my child nor my ancestors never done anything to oppress others. Also, the white people today in America, even the southern whites, should not pay for the deeds of their ancestors.

I'm still waiting for the day of Martin Luther King Jr, that we are judge by the content of our character instead of color of our skin.

Face it your daughter was lackluster and could not competitively compete against an African-American. Your mind is incapable to rationalizing this reality so your mind makes up an elaborate excuse how the African-American got in over the poor asian.

 

[Yabgu]

Then why did he adopt Persian customs and their language? Why are the kings called Shahs? Because he had no culture of his own and had to adopt Persian culture. Don't get so angry turk when you are confronted with the truth.



Face it your daughter was lackluster and could not competitively compete against an African-American. Your mind is incapable to rationalizing this reality so your mind makes up an elaborate excuse how the African-American got in over the poor asian.

Oh god, and I thought I'm talking to someone with knowledge.

Do you even know what shah is? Go and learn history and don't quote me before you learn because your making yourself seem stupid.