why was Sindh not "partitioned"??

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Unfortunately u have not improved one bit.

Yeah? really? well ... by now you should have known that i really dont give a ..... ehm... damn?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Unfortunately u have not improved one bit.

Who are you replying to?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

ISI does recognize them! That's why you fund them. Similary, you agree that BLA must be given freedom of speech according to the Pakistan's constitution. But you declared them terrorists. Very wrong.

See we gave these guys freedom :

 

[Areesh]

ISI does recognize them! That's why you fund them.

Lol. What kind of a weak and bogus logic is that? In that case RAW recognizes BLA and that's why funds it despite it can spend that money on providing toilets to Indian populace.

Similary, you agree that BLA must be given freedom of speech according to the Pakistan's constitution.

Because they are a militant organization. They don't write in newspapers to promote their whatever ideology. And according to Pakistani constitution nobody is allowed to pick up guns and kill people for whatever reason.

But you declared them terrorists. Very wrong.

We are following our constitution. Ask BLA to lay down the guns and go write some blog on wordpress about their ideology. We have no problem with that.

PS: Good that you stopped comparing apples and oranges like comparing Kashmir and Baluchistan.

See we gave these guys freedom :
View attachment 190833 View attachment 190834

Lol poor guy has lost all the arguments. It would be funny reading his posts. I am telling you now.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Lol. What kind of a weak and bogus logic is that? In that case RAW recognizes BLA and that's why funds it despite it can spend that money on providing toilets to Indian populace.



Because they are a militant organization. They don't write in newspapers to promote their whatever ideology. And according to Pakistani constitution nobody is allowed to pick up guns and kill people for whatever reason.



We are following our constitution. Ask BLA to lay down the guns and go write some blog on wordpress about their ideology. We have no problem with that.

PS: Good that you stopped comparing apples and oranges like comparing Kashmir and Baluchistan.



Lol poor guy has lost all the arguments. It would be funny reading his posts. I am telling you now.

Those guys are BLA perari commanders from Kohlu (insurgent strong hold) with Changez Khan Marri n his son..surrendering arms..

 

[Screambowl]

Lol. What kind of a weak and bogus logic is that? In that case RAW recognizes BLA and that's why funds it despite it can spend that money on providing toilets to Indian populace.



Because they are a militant organization. They don't write in newspapers to promote their whatever ideology. And according to Pakistani constitution nobody is allowed to pick up guns and kill people for whatever reason.



We are following our constitution. Ask BLA to lay down the guns and go write some blog on wordpress about their ideology. We have no problem with that.

PS: Good that you stopped comparing apples and oranges like comparing Kashmir and Baluchistan.



Lol poor guy has lost all the arguments. It would be funny reading his posts. I am telling you now.

RAW never recognized BLA, it was Iraq and US which recognized them and funded them till 70's. You are not even aware of the Baluchistan scenario.

Pakistan chose not to allow them(BLA) to write on newspapers and come forward democratically, so BLA had to take up arms. India allows Hurriyat to come forward democratically.

 

[Kabira]

At the time of Partition in 1947, the Hindu population of Pakistan was estimated at approximately a quarter of the total population. For example, the population of Karachi, Pakistan in 1947 was 450,000, of which 51% was Hindu, and 42% was Muslim. By 1951, Karachi�s population had increased to 1.137 million because of the influx of 600,000 Muslim refugees from India. In 1951, the Muslim population of Karachi was 96% and the Hindu population was 2%.[lx

At least come up with proper figures, hindu population was not more then 8% in Pakistan. Which now stand at 2-3% because they migrated. Plus half of these hindus were not even natives to begin with, they had migrated recently from India because of British masters.

I only feel sorry for sindhi hindu trading castes, they were peacefull people. They should have stayed, many did and many fled. But there was no place for any hindu of Indian origin any longer.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

RAW never recognized BLA, it was Iraq and US which recognized them and funded them till 70's. You are not even aware of the Baluchistan scenario.

Pakistan chose not to allow them(BLA) to write on newspapers and come forward democratically, so BLA had to take up arms. India allows Hurriyat to come forward democratically.

 

[Areesh]

RAW never recognized BLA, it was Iraq and US which recognized them and funded them till 70's.

So ISI also don't recognize ULFA and north east separatists.

You are not even aware of the Baluchistan scenario.

I perfectly know what I am talking about. Much more than you know about your "atoot ang".

Pakistan chose not to allow them(BLA) to write on newspapers and come forward democratically, so BLA had to take up arms.

Then you also didn't allow LeT, HUM, JeM, Khalistan militants, ULFA, Maoists and all other north east separatists militants a chance to write in newspapers, so they had to pick up guns.

 

[HRK]

It's actually a more general question and not exactly particular to the Indian case.

Which other country divided on the basis of RELIGION ??

Muslims are human beings. Just like any of us. You, me all. A population that is unaware of the diktats or are ignorant about mazh'b will live just like anybody else. In a country as diverse as India, praying to a different God personally is no big deal. Putting food on the table is the first priority.

Agreed cent percent agreed human beings are human beings & its does not matter you, I or anyone else pray to which good; putting the food on the table is priority of most of the population of the world not just in India but Why most of Muslims think Islam (as a whole) is not a personal matter... ??

But if Islam is the dominant nazariya then self isolation and later demand for secession becomes a natural outcome. This is true to a large extent to any religion that has an we vs them world view.

'DOMINANT NAZARIYA' ....

Socialism & Capitalism .... ??

Term muslims as the root cause of all the evils, but Why a religion can not be dominate Ideology for the masses ??

like 'Neo' Indian Nationalism is predominantly having 'DHRAMIC' bases ??

In India it took time as well. Take Allama Iqbal for example. Was he mistreated? Nope. Was he humiliated? Nope. Discriminated? Not at all. But in 4 years of writing 'Sare Jahan Se Accha' he wrote 'Chin o Arab humara'...you know the rest.

Why just Allama Iqbal ..... why not ask about 'M.A. Jinnah' or any other leader ??

Why A MUSLIM feel himself/herself different from the others (or in the case of India different from HINDU & SIKH)..... ??

and 'if' all the Muslim all over the Globe feel the same way then why the results are different in India... ??

Why British India failed to exist as a single political entity ??

 

[Areesh]

Those guys are BLA perari commanders from Kohlu (insurgent strong hold) with Changez Khan Marri n his son..surrendering arms..

Yeah I know. Happened a few days ago. Good to see someone's tax money going to waste.

 

[Kabira]

Partition it self was blunder, even now more muslims live in India then either BD or Pak. At least land up to Tajmahal should have become muslim country. Need of another partition will arise soon in India.

 

[Areesh]

Partition it self was blunder, even now more muslims live in India then either BD or Pak. At least land up to Tajmahal should have become muslim country. Need of another partition will arise soon in India.

Well that's not true.

 

[Screambowl]

So ISI also don't recognize ULFA and north east separatists

Then you also didn't allow LeT, HUM, JeM, Khalistan militants, ULFA, Maoists and all other north east separatists militants a chance to write in newspapers, so they had to pick up guns.

LeT is Pakistani grown, JeM is Pakistani grown, HuM is Pakistani grown.. those who are caught are Pakistanis, how are they related to Indian movement?

ULFA That's an internal matter of India, why Pakistan is so curious that they started funding them? The only difference is.. India has proofs of Pakistani involvement Pakistan does not have proof of Indian involvement. Care to understand?

 

[Areesh]

That's an internal matter of India, why Pakistan is so curious that they started funding them?

Baluchistan is also internal matter of Pakistan, why India is so curious that they started funding them?

The only difference is.. India has proofs of Pakistani involvement Pakistan does not have proof of Indian involvement.

The difference is. India has no proof of Pakistani involvement while Pakistan has loads of proof for India's involvement in supporting terror.

Care to understand?

Yup. Now I hope you understand too.