Obviously it has limits for the time being.. but not in this case..since it is limited in its scope to replace the pilot after detection of enemy aircrafts.. we are not trying to replace human brain here.. you can check the Chinese section to see where the field is at right now..
agar meine net pe hi dhoondna hota to aapko takleef na deta. I havent found any thing worthwhile to convince me.
how important are agility and maneuverability for air superiority?Sir main mission of Su-34 is to strike, CAS, and anti-ship (maritime) not air superiority like Su-35, Su-34 has reduce agility (maneuverability), fixed inlets which means reduce speed (MACH-1.8) no TVC for improve agility, radar and avionics is more specifically design for strike, CAS and anti-ship missions rather than AD jet like Su-35 has
Well, you can compare the SU-24 with the SU-30 for example..you are doing the same with their replacements..one is for CAS the other is for air superiority..
I get the role, but SU34 is based on SU-27 just like SU35. SU-24 was something very different in built, not the role which is strike for both aircrafts.
The only SU with two seats side-by-side is the SU-24.. which did not have air to air missiles..maybe added later on/.. they took the large frame of the SU-27 for its payload capacity and made a hybrid for CAS with some air to air missiles too..If I am not mistaken it was called SU-31 or 32 before it was definitely named SU-34..
in today's world , it could be few set of some micro chips , in engines or in the computers of that jet fighters , can work with , satalite operating
There are only three instances I can recall where US fighters faced each other on two different sides.. KSA F-15s against Iranian F-4s in the Gulf..and twice when Saudi F-15s intercepted Usraeli F-16s..forcing them to lend in Saudi Arabia in the second encounter.. and there was no kill switch involved..
practically both were not lining up against USAF ????
So there is no way for knowing till someone confronts the US with its own weapons.. from here to there.. the kill swish remains speculatory..
than why F-22, F-35 J-20, PAK-FA uses area rule (streamline fuselage)
then why those jet including TVC engines (including 4 and 4.5 gen) look at the forward fuselage of Su-34 it can't sustain 9G load as compare to AD jets, SUKHOI intentionally made Su-34 less agile and maneuverable, because Fighter jets is design based on their missions not someone wishes, for survival of there multiple methods those are electronic jamming, ECM ECCM,EW, chaff and flares as for AD jets if all electronic system fails last ditch effort to use AB or (top speed) to get out off no escape zone from AAMs, SAM, Su-34 is more relying on those electronic systems rather than a top speed to avoid interceptions
they know & they monitor it , it's a open secret , how they often find the info & most of the times that , some conflict is about to happen , & what are troops positions & which front they are moving ?
