We are a Congress-minded nation.
In saying this, I dont mean were a nation of Congress voters, though that also is not inaccurate. Other than in one election, 1977, Indians have always voted for the Congress more than for any other party.
What I mean is that Indian values are best, and I would even say, only represented by the Congress. These values are religious accommodation, comfort with racial and linguistic diversity, acceptance of caste in politics, comfort in dynasty and a preference for compromise over principle. This flexibility has kept India democratic, and it is a Congress trait. The party also represents the middle-class consensus which views India as a great civilizing force, and seeks a nurturing of Indias cultural aesthetic.
In Pakistans The Express Tribune, Khaled Ahmed wrote on 8 April: The Indian Constitution informs the attitude of the Indian middle class, which is tolerant of secularism. This is true, and as an idea it is owned by the Congress.
Unlike the Tories and Labour in the UK or Republicans and Democrats in the US, we dont have division by ideology in Hindu middle-class society.
Writer Arvind Rajagopal made this point by asking who, if the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was the Hindu right, was the Hindu left? Theres no such thing, of course.
The BJP thinks it is an ideological party but it doesnt have any real ideology. The partys three ideological thrusts are all negative: Muslims shouldnt keep their family law, Muslims shouldnt keep Ram Janmabhoomi, Muslims shouldnt keep separate status through Article 370 in Kashmir.
Ideology is something you stand for, not against. The CPM is an ideological party. The BJP is a party of resentful Hindus (symbolized by the face of a permanently sour Arun Jaitley).
We can observe a demonstration of this in the collapse of the Ayodhya movement. Its supporters were not in favour of the temple, but against the usurping mosque. Once the mosque disappeared, so did the movement of which we now hear little. This flaw is in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) gene and was passed on.
Muslim concession always deflates the BJP, and this explains the partys decline, which will continue. The middle-class Hindus bigotry against the Muslim is reactive. His hatred is not ideological or dogmatic, such as the Muslims for the Jew. His bigotry responds to offences against him real and imaginedSomnath temple or Partition.
Because the bigotry is reactive and not ideological, the Congress has been able to accommodate it where required almost as efficiently as the BJP.
An irreligious Congress such as Jawaharlal Nehrus does not put off Hindus, but it thinks it cannot afford to take the chance. This opportunism also aligns the Congress morally with Indians.
Many hate Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi now but historically, the Congress has never been above using a little slaughter to appease Hindus, like in Ahmedabad in 1969 under Hitendrabhai Desai. During the 1992-93 riots, when Surat burned, Gujarat was ruled not by the BJP but by Chimanbhai Patel. When Delhis Hindus turned against Sikhs in 1984, Rajiv Gandhi looked away.
It is only under Sonia Gandhi that the party has again become the standard-bearer for Ashokan secularism. She will go down in history as the finest Congress leader along with Nehru.
Pakistans Ahmed separates Congress voters from BJP voters in this fashion: Many factors are common between the city-dwelling middle classes of India and Pakistan. The middle class lives in the city and votes rightwing. The Bharatiya Janata Party gets its vote in the city; the Congress party gets it from the rural areas.
Secondly, the BJPs appeal for its voters lies in caste rather than ideology. For example, it is a Lingayat party in Karnataka. Its problems there have come because the RSS does not accept this fact and denies Lingayat champion B.S. Yeddyurappa his due. Ahmeds observation that the middle class aligns with the BJP is valid only so far as middle class can be conflated with upper castes, seen as BJP voters. Middle-class expansion is today happening in India because of the rapid entry of lower castes. This is actually lethal for the BJP and good for the Congress. Unlike in Pakistan, Indias middle-class expansion will make it more moderate.
There is a reason why the Congress continually attracts young and urbane talent, but the BJP doesnt. The reason is the alignment of the Congress with the broad Indian sentiment, which makes it naturally attractive and competitive. The open-minded BJP leader like Manohar Parrikar senses this and must often distance himself from the RSS position. In the Congress, Nitin Gadkari would have made even district president with difficulty.
I predict the decline of the BJP and the fragmentation of its state units into regional parties based on caste. This breaking away will paradoxically make these units more acceptable in coalitions and more coherent. The signs are visible in Rajasthan and Karnataka, where Hindutva has become irrelevant. In Gujarat, the party will collapse after the autocrat exits.
The Congress under the Gandhis, and later the Vadra-Gandhis, will remain our one great national party.
I nailed my colours to the mast in my column of 17 May 2009, but it is appropriate in a piece such as this that I again disclose my allegiance.
I am a Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) voter. I was persuaded by a newspaper article. In 1996, writer Meenal Baghel reported a BSP rally in Uttar Pradesh for TheIndian Express. She described rain, a large crowd, wet, and the bamboo barricades it was straining.
Mayawati mounted the stage and said: Chamari hoon, kunwari hoon, tumhari hoon (Im low-caste, single, yours). What a terrific line. I was seduced immediately.
The BSP is corrupt, true. But it has not butchered Sikhs or set Muslim children on fire. It has more legitimate grievance with India than any other group (Gandhi said of B.R. Ambedkar: That he does not break our heads is an act of self-restraint on his part). But it doesnt extract justice through collective punishment. It is pragmatic with its social tormentors, a quality I admire.
It doesnt share the Hindu middle-class fantasy that India will become a world power tomorrow, though most of us are illiterate and hungry and will remain so in our generation, and the next and the next.
I have sometimes wondered if I do right in voting BSP, for I am greatly attracted to Manmohan Singh, and because I have lived in states where BSP candidates usually forfeit their deposits.
But I have never felt guilt.
Why the Congress represents Indian values best - Columns - livemint.com
Such JNU Wallah delhi Dumbf*cks have to be Put under a Gun Fire.
In saying this, I dont mean were a nation of Congress voters, though that also is not inaccurate. Other than in one election, 1977, Indians have always voted for the Congress more than for any other party.
What I mean is that Indian values are best, and I would even say, only represented by the Congress. These values are religious accommodation, comfort with racial and linguistic diversity, acceptance of caste in politics, comfort in dynasty and a preference for compromise over principle. This flexibility has kept India democratic, and it is a Congress trait. The party also represents the middle-class consensus which views India as a great civilizing force, and seeks a nurturing of Indias cultural aesthetic.
In Pakistans The Express Tribune, Khaled Ahmed wrote on 8 April: The Indian Constitution informs the attitude of the Indian middle class, which is tolerant of secularism. This is true, and as an idea it is owned by the Congress.
Unlike the Tories and Labour in the UK or Republicans and Democrats in the US, we dont have division by ideology in Hindu middle-class society.
Writer Arvind Rajagopal made this point by asking who, if the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was the Hindu right, was the Hindu left? Theres no such thing, of course.
The BJP thinks it is an ideological party but it doesnt have any real ideology. The partys three ideological thrusts are all negative: Muslims shouldnt keep their family law, Muslims shouldnt keep Ram Janmabhoomi, Muslims shouldnt keep separate status through Article 370 in Kashmir.
Ideology is something you stand for, not against. The CPM is an ideological party. The BJP is a party of resentful Hindus (symbolized by the face of a permanently sour Arun Jaitley).
We can observe a demonstration of this in the collapse of the Ayodhya movement. Its supporters were not in favour of the temple, but against the usurping mosque. Once the mosque disappeared, so did the movement of which we now hear little. This flaw is in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) gene and was passed on.
Muslim concession always deflates the BJP, and this explains the partys decline, which will continue. The middle-class Hindus bigotry against the Muslim is reactive. His hatred is not ideological or dogmatic, such as the Muslims for the Jew. His bigotry responds to offences against him real and imaginedSomnath temple or Partition.
Because the bigotry is reactive and not ideological, the Congress has been able to accommodate it where required almost as efficiently as the BJP.
An irreligious Congress such as Jawaharlal Nehrus does not put off Hindus, but it thinks it cannot afford to take the chance. This opportunism also aligns the Congress morally with Indians.
Many hate Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi now but historically, the Congress has never been above using a little slaughter to appease Hindus, like in Ahmedabad in 1969 under Hitendrabhai Desai. During the 1992-93 riots, when Surat burned, Gujarat was ruled not by the BJP but by Chimanbhai Patel. When Delhis Hindus turned against Sikhs in 1984, Rajiv Gandhi looked away.
It is only under Sonia Gandhi that the party has again become the standard-bearer for Ashokan secularism. She will go down in history as the finest Congress leader along with Nehru.
Pakistans Ahmed separates Congress voters from BJP voters in this fashion: Many factors are common between the city-dwelling middle classes of India and Pakistan. The middle class lives in the city and votes rightwing. The Bharatiya Janata Party gets its vote in the city; the Congress party gets it from the rural areas.
Secondly, the BJPs appeal for its voters lies in caste rather than ideology. For example, it is a Lingayat party in Karnataka. Its problems there have come because the RSS does not accept this fact and denies Lingayat champion B.S. Yeddyurappa his due. Ahmeds observation that the middle class aligns with the BJP is valid only so far as middle class can be conflated with upper castes, seen as BJP voters. Middle-class expansion is today happening in India because of the rapid entry of lower castes. This is actually lethal for the BJP and good for the Congress. Unlike in Pakistan, Indias middle-class expansion will make it more moderate.
There is a reason why the Congress continually attracts young and urbane talent, but the BJP doesnt. The reason is the alignment of the Congress with the broad Indian sentiment, which makes it naturally attractive and competitive. The open-minded BJP leader like Manohar Parrikar senses this and must often distance himself from the RSS position. In the Congress, Nitin Gadkari would have made even district president with difficulty.
I predict the decline of the BJP and the fragmentation of its state units into regional parties based on caste. This breaking away will paradoxically make these units more acceptable in coalitions and more coherent. The signs are visible in Rajasthan and Karnataka, where Hindutva has become irrelevant. In Gujarat, the party will collapse after the autocrat exits.
The Congress under the Gandhis, and later the Vadra-Gandhis, will remain our one great national party.
I nailed my colours to the mast in my column of 17 May 2009, but it is appropriate in a piece such as this that I again disclose my allegiance.
I am a Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) voter. I was persuaded by a newspaper article. In 1996, writer Meenal Baghel reported a BSP rally in Uttar Pradesh for TheIndian Express. She described rain, a large crowd, wet, and the bamboo barricades it was straining.
Mayawati mounted the stage and said: Chamari hoon, kunwari hoon, tumhari hoon (Im low-caste, single, yours). What a terrific line. I was seduced immediately.
The BSP is corrupt, true. But it has not butchered Sikhs or set Muslim children on fire. It has more legitimate grievance with India than any other group (Gandhi said of B.R. Ambedkar: That he does not break our heads is an act of self-restraint on his part). But it doesnt extract justice through collective punishment. It is pragmatic with its social tormentors, a quality I admire.
It doesnt share the Hindu middle-class fantasy that India will become a world power tomorrow, though most of us are illiterate and hungry and will remain so in our generation, and the next and the next.
I have sometimes wondered if I do right in voting BSP, for I am greatly attracted to Manmohan Singh, and because I have lived in states where BSP candidates usually forfeit their deposits.
But I have never felt guilt.
Why the Congress represents Indian values best - Columns - livemint.com
Such JNU Wallah delhi Dumbf*cks have to be Put under a Gun Fire.
