fatman17
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 32,563
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
- Location
Why the army will have to go into North Waziristan
By Imtiaz Gul
Published: July 15, 2011
Entire American establishment believes Haqqani network exports terror to Afghan and needs to be crushed by Pakistan Army.
ISLAMABAD:
Shortly before leaving Kabul, General David Petraeus, the outgoing chief commander of the US-Isaf troops, referred to Pakistan Armys long-overdue operation in Kurram and the trans-border movement by Afghan militants and their TTP affiliates as North Waziristan in Reverse.
He tossed the phrase in the presence of other Isaf representatives, suggesting that North Waziristan would have to be the Pakistan Armys next destination a place that the US abhors due to the presence of an al Qaeda-inspired militant conglomerate, presumably protected by the Haqqani network. The entire American establishment believes this network exports terror to the Afghan soil and thus needs to be crushed by the Pakistan Army something that the latter has thus far resisted. American exhortations in this regard have been shunned using multiple, and at times incomprehensible, reasons embedded in issues such as capacity and social milieu.
But, over 10 weeks since the surprise termination of Osama bin Laden and relations with the United States appearing to have hit rock-bottom, the narrative on North Waziristan seems to be changing. The situation in Kurram and the cross-border attacks on security posts in Bajaur and Dir in the last two weeks necessitated a geographical military activity in North Waziristan.
Highly-placed military officials now tell us that the recently-launched operation in the embattled and isolated Kurram Agency was a move to plug all the holes before taking on militants of all hue holed up in North Waziristan.
The initial target of the geographical operation is the area around the mountains that separate North and South Waziristan. Initial targets include Shawal and Makeen, where the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the avowed enemy number one of the state of Pakistan, took refuge after the army dislocated them from the Mehsud regions of Laddha, Makeen and Sararogha in October/November 2009. Other obvious targets include Miramshah, the administrative headquarters of North Waziristan, Dattakhel and particularly Mirali, considered to be a bee-hive housing the TTP, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, usually referred to as the Punjabi Taliban.
Apparently opposed to a full-scale military offensive in North Waziristan, and prisoner of a bloated ego, the military, under the burden of circumstances, has opted to call its activity in Shawal geographical operation, rather than a full-scale or even a selective operation.
But let us face reality: Whatever spin and name, the American pressure and the countrywide censure of the military in the aftermath of the Bin Laden affair, has finally done the trick. The much-awaited military movement against radical, al Qaeda-linked militants is now under way albeit without a major declaration to the effect.
However selective, the military is now gradually on the move in North Waziristan to hunt the enemy, and this deserves appreciation rather than scorn and scepticism. But, based on the ground realities in North Waziristan, which adjoins the entire greater Paktia region home to the Haqqanis Zadran tribe the belated crackdown also requires a national consensus, plenty of patience and understanding for several reasons.
Firstly, while the decision to embark on a selective offensive against al Qaeda marks a clear attempt to mend the fractured relationship with the United States, it, hopefully, also underscores a new realism within the military establishment: The refusal to crackdown on all Arab-African, Afghan and Pakistani affiliates of the Haqqani network in fact the network itself holds no water any more. The circumstances surrounding Pakistan simply demand a definite move against all those elements that are directly or otherwise a source of attacks on the interests of the state of Pakistan.
Secondly, any direct assault on the Haqqanis and affiliates in North Waziristan means stoking a bee-hive of all those who are already filled with a sense of betrayal by the erstwhile security institutions, and who, by implication, have become foot-soldiers for al Qaeda and are more than eager to peddle and promote the kind of terrorism that Bin Laden and Ayman Al Zawahiri stand for.
Any assault or even limited confrontation with some or all of these militant outfits will almost certainly trigger a reaction in mainland Pakistan meaning cities such as Peshawar, Mardan, some southern districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa such as DI Khan and Kohat, as well as Rawalpindi and Lahore. By implication, we should all anticipate, and be ready for, the kind of violence that Pakistanis suffered in the aftermath of the Lal Masjid operation in 2007, or the terror attacks in the last half of 2009. Thirdly, and this point flows from the second element which had held the army back from a crackdown in North Waziristan, the ensuing violence is likely to herald a new wave of uncertainty and instability across the country. The military establishment was already unsure, given the wobbly political landscape, whether the civilian government would be able to absorb shockwaves produced by an al Qaeda-inspired onslaught.
Security agencies fear that supporters of al Qaeda and its Pakistani auxiliaries might set off a new wave of terror if their mentors in North Waziristan were attacked.
Fourthly, the Haqqanis enjoy the reputation of being strategic assets of the Pakistani military establishment.
Fifth, a peace accord, signed on February 17, 2008, still holds true for North Waziristan, where people like Hafiz Gul Bahadur and Maulvi Sadiq Noor both close friends of the Haqqanis act as guarantors. Any unilateral action by the army would amount to a breach and thus might even result in adverse reactions by Bahadur and Noor.
As a whole, the advance on North Waziristan is fraught with risks. But what is obvious is that, sooner or later, Pakistan will have to face up to them for its long-term interest. History suggests that short-term pains must be taken to preempt long-term socio-political disasters. The antidote for the conglomerate of religiously-driven militants is a conclusive official campaign free of fear or favour. Therein lies the long-term salvation of Pakistan and this is why a military advance in North Waziristan is inevitable regardless of how the security establishment characterises it.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 15th, 2011.
By Imtiaz Gul
Published: July 15, 2011
Entire American establishment believes Haqqani network exports terror to Afghan and needs to be crushed by Pakistan Army.
ISLAMABAD:
Shortly before leaving Kabul, General David Petraeus, the outgoing chief commander of the US-Isaf troops, referred to Pakistan Armys long-overdue operation in Kurram and the trans-border movement by Afghan militants and their TTP affiliates as North Waziristan in Reverse.
He tossed the phrase in the presence of other Isaf representatives, suggesting that North Waziristan would have to be the Pakistan Armys next destination a place that the US abhors due to the presence of an al Qaeda-inspired militant conglomerate, presumably protected by the Haqqani network. The entire American establishment believes this network exports terror to the Afghan soil and thus needs to be crushed by the Pakistan Army something that the latter has thus far resisted. American exhortations in this regard have been shunned using multiple, and at times incomprehensible, reasons embedded in issues such as capacity and social milieu.
But, over 10 weeks since the surprise termination of Osama bin Laden and relations with the United States appearing to have hit rock-bottom, the narrative on North Waziristan seems to be changing. The situation in Kurram and the cross-border attacks on security posts in Bajaur and Dir in the last two weeks necessitated a geographical military activity in North Waziristan.
Highly-placed military officials now tell us that the recently-launched operation in the embattled and isolated Kurram Agency was a move to plug all the holes before taking on militants of all hue holed up in North Waziristan.
The initial target of the geographical operation is the area around the mountains that separate North and South Waziristan. Initial targets include Shawal and Makeen, where the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the avowed enemy number one of the state of Pakistan, took refuge after the army dislocated them from the Mehsud regions of Laddha, Makeen and Sararogha in October/November 2009. Other obvious targets include Miramshah, the administrative headquarters of North Waziristan, Dattakhel and particularly Mirali, considered to be a bee-hive housing the TTP, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, usually referred to as the Punjabi Taliban.
Apparently opposed to a full-scale military offensive in North Waziristan, and prisoner of a bloated ego, the military, under the burden of circumstances, has opted to call its activity in Shawal geographical operation, rather than a full-scale or even a selective operation.
But let us face reality: Whatever spin and name, the American pressure and the countrywide censure of the military in the aftermath of the Bin Laden affair, has finally done the trick. The much-awaited military movement against radical, al Qaeda-linked militants is now under way albeit without a major declaration to the effect.
However selective, the military is now gradually on the move in North Waziristan to hunt the enemy, and this deserves appreciation rather than scorn and scepticism. But, based on the ground realities in North Waziristan, which adjoins the entire greater Paktia region home to the Haqqanis Zadran tribe the belated crackdown also requires a national consensus, plenty of patience and understanding for several reasons.
Firstly, while the decision to embark on a selective offensive against al Qaeda marks a clear attempt to mend the fractured relationship with the United States, it, hopefully, also underscores a new realism within the military establishment: The refusal to crackdown on all Arab-African, Afghan and Pakistani affiliates of the Haqqani network in fact the network itself holds no water any more. The circumstances surrounding Pakistan simply demand a definite move against all those elements that are directly or otherwise a source of attacks on the interests of the state of Pakistan.
Secondly, any direct assault on the Haqqanis and affiliates in North Waziristan means stoking a bee-hive of all those who are already filled with a sense of betrayal by the erstwhile security institutions, and who, by implication, have become foot-soldiers for al Qaeda and are more than eager to peddle and promote the kind of terrorism that Bin Laden and Ayman Al Zawahiri stand for.
Any assault or even limited confrontation with some or all of these militant outfits will almost certainly trigger a reaction in mainland Pakistan meaning cities such as Peshawar, Mardan, some southern districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa such as DI Khan and Kohat, as well as Rawalpindi and Lahore. By implication, we should all anticipate, and be ready for, the kind of violence that Pakistanis suffered in the aftermath of the Lal Masjid operation in 2007, or the terror attacks in the last half of 2009. Thirdly, and this point flows from the second element which had held the army back from a crackdown in North Waziristan, the ensuing violence is likely to herald a new wave of uncertainty and instability across the country. The military establishment was already unsure, given the wobbly political landscape, whether the civilian government would be able to absorb shockwaves produced by an al Qaeda-inspired onslaught.
Security agencies fear that supporters of al Qaeda and its Pakistani auxiliaries might set off a new wave of terror if their mentors in North Waziristan were attacked.
Fourthly, the Haqqanis enjoy the reputation of being strategic assets of the Pakistani military establishment.
Fifth, a peace accord, signed on February 17, 2008, still holds true for North Waziristan, where people like Hafiz Gul Bahadur and Maulvi Sadiq Noor both close friends of the Haqqanis act as guarantors. Any unilateral action by the army would amount to a breach and thus might even result in adverse reactions by Bahadur and Noor.
As a whole, the advance on North Waziristan is fraught with risks. But what is obvious is that, sooner or later, Pakistan will have to face up to them for its long-term interest. History suggests that short-term pains must be taken to preempt long-term socio-political disasters. The antidote for the conglomerate of religiously-driven militants is a conclusive official campaign free of fear or favour. Therein lies the long-term salvation of Pakistan and this is why a military advance in North Waziristan is inevitable regardless of how the security establishment characterises it.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 15th, 2011.
Well i think game is bigger and dirty, As we all know that Pakistani people are being fooled by many politicians some are traitors like zardari and nawaz and some are naive! i won't say naive politician name! Well what i believe that Pakistan is being told by one politician that Pakistan can survive without aid or IMF and world bank which is totally rubbish, no country in the world can survive without these programs especially again especially third world countries, We are told that we have resources but what are we gonna do with them if we have a ban to sell from UN? who will buy them? country like USA which has the 100% tax collection system has 25% GDP from tax revenues, rest is exports! and we Pakistan which is a nation which has less then 10% tax collection towards GDP revenue is being told that we can stand on our own? well let's move forward, Even if we collect 100% tax this will max become 20% of our GDP then how will do business when world won't do business with us? Don't tell me that Muslim world will do business with us!! now going to next point, this is all check by USA, now situation is that USA cut the aid to Pakistan and on the contrary dropped 11 hell fire in these days to show that even if we don't pay we will still bomb those areas and if you wanna stop us then bring your anti aircraft guns and fighter jets! and as we all know that our army has admitted that we can't fight off USA let alone Pakistan i don't think anyone can fight off USA alone and i mean no country in this world alone. now having said that someone has to be realistic and decide carefully! on the other side when USA cut our aid and Pakistan threaten to pull back troops from afghan boarder! what do we see? 
