Why So Many Terrorists Are Arabs

[Hack-Hook]

Simple answer.

Arabs are the founders of Islam. They are the nucleus of the religion, and therefore hold the most radical and fundamentalist population.

The further away you go from the Muslim mainland, the less radical the population. Take Bangladesh, Albania, Malaysia, Bosnia, Turkey, or Kazakhstan as examples.

well simple question , in what category you'll put Lord Resistance army or Khmer Rouge ?

 

[WhiteMansBurden]

well simple question , in what category you'll put Lord Resistance army or Khmer Rouge ?

What do you mean what category? In terms of ethnicity, race, nationality, type of war they are waging, size, religion... what?

 

[Hack-Hook]

What do you mean what category? In terms of ethnicity, race, nationality, type of war they are waging, size, religion... what?

in term of why they are terrorist , one is religious another one Atheist and non are Muslim

 

[WhiteMansBurden]

in term of why they are terrorist , one is religious another one Atheist and non are Muslim

I don't know, and I don't think it's relevant.

 

[MuslimConscript]

Because the executors never call themselves as terrorists. They call themselves as heroes. NATO said so, so does Al-Qaeda Jihadists. Basically, both of them are wrong, but people emotionally caught between them.


Actually, seeing you are Iranian, you should not said that way. Because the so called terrorists are actually a real terrorist for your people. You are the enemy, they killed a lot of you in Iraq in the terrorist acts. And in Syria too.

You emotionally caught between them from the clever propaganda.

You get the Point, Both are wrong and it's just clever propaganda,
Yet the west didn't used the word Christian Terrorism when christian extremist carried out the massacere in Indonesia during Eid ul-Fitri in 1999 which killed an estimated 800 Muslim in Maluku, and the Vatican even ask The Goverment to Pardon Terrorist who Beheaded the Entire people inside Islamic Boarding School the Pesantren Walisongo in Poso in the name of Humanity,
Funny isn't it? Where's those "Humanity" when the Student, Teachers and their Family(Women and Child) get beheaded and their body being throw up on the river

www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs...catholic-terror-was-never-used-about-ira.html

Edit: Both of that massacere was happen before 9/11

 

[Mav3rick]

Jeez, that sounds like you support dictatorships that rule by fear...?

I do not support dictatorship in general, however there are countries which have been much better off under so called 'dictators' then in democracy. Transition to democracy should be the eventual goal of any dictator, especially if he/she so assumes power in a desperate bid to save his nation (emphasis on the word 'nation' and purposeful neglect of the word 'Country').

Regardless of the above, I was merely trying to explain how much better off Iraq was under dictatorship then after it.

 

[PeaceGen]

I do not support dictatorship in general, however there are countries which have been much better off under so called 'dictators' then in democracy. Transition to democracy should be the eventual goal of any dictator, especially if he/she so assumes power in a desperate bid to save his nation (emphasis on the word 'nation' and purposeful neglect of the word 'Country').

Regardless of the above, I was merely trying to explain how much better off Iraq was under dictatorship then after it.

I'll admit 2 things;
- just before the invasion and regime-change of Iraq, i was supportive of such action because I thought Saddam was a particularly brutal and oppressive dictator.
- but when viewing the net results of the invasion of Iraq, i learned that dividing your forces is a bad idea because of the extra violence that generates in all invaded territories (i mean Afghanistan and Iraq in this case).

I plan to take that lesson learned to all future messages I send to my NATO governments about any plans for future invasions they announce.
In fact, I've already changed my tune to advocate much more domestically-defensive tactics and strategies rather than 'taking the fight to the enemy' in the future.

And I have also advocated to NATO officials and on this forum and other forums that NATO do not supply arms to the Syrian resistance because that only prolongs the conflict there..