What's new

Why So Many Terrorists Are Arabs

Not by accident, by deliberate carpet bombings and Nuke strikes! The US alone is responsible for more civilian deaths then the rest of the world combined. Over a million women and children died in Iraq alone because of the unjust US war in that country, we shall not even bother discuss any other war of the US alone. Do you, or any sane mind, even consider the possibility of Muslim 'terrorists' ever achieving the figure of 1 million?????

Self deleted
 
.
I wonder why these article only consider low tech act of terror as terrorism.
Why they don't want to consider killing innocent people with million dollar bomb and missiles also is terrorism.
Why they don't want to think that also arming terrorists while we knew who they really are just because they are against the guys we don't like.

Because the executors never call themselves as terrorists. They call themselves as heroes. NATO said so, so does Al-Qaeda Jihadists. Basically, both of them are wrong, but people emotionally caught between them.


Actually, seeing you are Iranian, you should not said that way. Because the so called terrorists are actually a real terrorist for your people. You are the enemy, they killed a lot of you in Iraq in the terrorist acts. And in Syria too.

You emotionally caught between them from the clever propaganda.
 
.
it might seem offensive to some but they got nothing to do.. they have no jobs/no gfs/they dont drink. nothing really fun happening. got to do something to get the loads off!!!
 
.
It's not about lowtech/hitech means that kill civilians, it's about intent and purpose.

It's not NATO's intent or policy to kill civilians.
It is for terrorists.

Well ask you something what's the difference between what nato and co. Did in sumali and terrorism . They overthrow a functional government and replaced it with chaos and what we see today . Isn't the blood of every single sumalian whi have been killed since then on their hand .

In 2006 israel attacked civilian of lebanon without any consideration and even used cluster bombs against them . What was the different between that and terrorism.

Wasn't usa use of agent orange and nspalms in Vietnam any different from terrorism .

What about using nuke against jaoanese civilians or firebombing Tokyo?

What about depleted uranium in iraq ?

.
.
.
.
 
.
Because the executors never call themselves as terrorists. They call themselves as heroes. NATO said so, so does Al-Qaeda Jihadists. Basically, both of them are wrong, but people emotionally caught between them.


Actually, seeing you are Iranian, you should not said that way. Because the so called terrorists are actually a real terrorist for your people. You are the enemy, they killed a lot of you in Iraq in the terrorist acts. And in Syria too.

You emotionally caught between them from the clever propaganda.

The article is a racist one . The writer of it has sime hidden agenda .
The matter that shias are being killed on daily base is something else .
After all the end wont justify the mean.
 
.
The article is a racist one . The writer of it has sime hidden agenda .
The matter that shias are being killed on daily base is something else .
After all the end wont justify the mean.

It just a cultural clash. It's the author problem, not the Arabs.

As a Chinese, well...I understand. There are tons of articles about Chinese in internet...whatever the content and perspective of the authors. I do believe you bump some of it in internet and newspapers. I think, there's no people on planet Earth that understand you more than Chinese...I guess so.
 
.
Well ask you something what's the difference between what nato and co. Did in sumali and terrorism . They overthrow a functional government and replaced it with chaos and what we see today . Isn't the blood of every single sumalian whi have been killed since then on their hand .

In 2006 israel attacked civilian of lebanon without any consideration and even used cluster bombs against them . What was the different between that and terrorism.

Wasn't usa use of agent orange and nspalms in Vietnam any different from terrorism .

What about using nuke against jaoanese civilians or firebombing Tokyo?

What about depleted uranium in iraq ?

.
.
.
.

The world is a twisted place now. As your Al Qur'an say about the future, where people can't tell the different between right and wrong.

Yeah, aggressor vs victim...That is not so true. In this world, everyone have sins. Fooling and being fooled, hurting and being hurt, down to the individual level. Everyone is pretending to be a good guy...
 
.
I wonder why these article only consider low tech act of terror as terrorism.
Why they don't want to consider killing innocent people with million dollar bomb and missiles also is terrorism.
Why they don't want to think that also arming terrorists while we knew who they really are just because they are against the guys we don't like.

You hit the nail on the head. Assassination is not really an Arabic invention, nor is Hashishi anything more special than assassination organization throughout the world. For example, Jin Ke is a very famous Chinese assassin known his attempt on Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China and the one that arguably started unification of Chinese culture. Assassinations in Roman empires (both the original and Byzantium) are also so prevalent that they coined the phrase backstabbing.

For the most part, modern middle Eastern countries are embroiled in the power struggle from A LOT of major powers and since they couldn't fight back the attack in the open field, the next best thing will have to do. This is why even though North Korea is reviled by the western world, but you would never see a terrorist from North Korea.
 
.
I read more reports of shia killing sunni and vice-versa in Iraq than I read about NATO bombs killing civilians there.

Before the US invasion or after? And where are you getting your reports from? Don't you think you would be fed news that suits the west by media that is indeed controlled & owned by the Jews (over 90% of all media)? And while you go search for stuff, let me tell you how peaceful Iraq was before the US invasion. It was a prosperous country where everyone feared Saddam and hence everyone lived by the law.

The US annihilated the peace, spread weapons and 'just' causes for infighting and is also directly responsible for millions of Iraqi deaths!

In all American war in subcontinent, Pakistan was ally. Pakistan has given US green signal for air strike in which a lots of innocent civilians have died. So if US responsible, Pakistan is equally responsible.

You are somewhat correct from your viewpoint, although since my Governments have consistently denied the charge, most of the civilians (over 80%) are actually naive enough to accept the official BS.

But involvement or complicity of the Pakistani government, for whatever reasons, cannot absolve the US of the charge that it is the biggest mass terrorist the world has ever witnessed.
 
.
Well ask you something what's the difference between what nato and co. Did in sumali and terrorism . They overthrow a functional government and replaced it with chaos and what we see today . Isn't the blood of every single sumalian whi have been killed since then on their hand .

The mission in somalia is according to US, NATO Allies Prepare New Invasion Of Somalia >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Winds about overthrowing the al shabaab "government". Somalia's neighbors asked for this intervention, NATO is only providing military assistance and training as far as I can tell.

According to Al-Shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) said:
Al-Shabaab describes itself as waging jihad against "enemies of Islam", and is engaged in combat against the TFG and the African Union Mission to Somalia (AMISOM). Alleging ulterior motives on the part of foreign organizations, group members have also reportedly intimidated, kidnapped and killed aid workers, leading to a suspension of humanitarian operations and an exodus of relief agents.[11] Al-Shabaab has been designated a terrorist organization by several Western governments and security services.
So, al shabaab is a direct affiliate of alQuada. While some muslims may call fundamentalistic islam a functional government, we here in the west can not, primarily for these two reasons;
- they too often engage in terrorism
- they impose socially- and culturally-restrictive islamic values on the entire population they control

In 2006 israel attacked civilian of lebanon without any consideration and even used cluster bombs against them . What was the different between that and terrorism.

Let me start off with the fact that I don't like the use of "asymettrical force" (closest translation to NATO lingo of your using the word "terrorism" in relation with NATO/Israeli military actions).
I don't like our retirement funds investing in things like cluster bombs, and I have advocated many times already to NATO governments that (drones for instance) need smaller warheads rather than larger ones, pin-point strikes are better than very destructive large bombs.

As for the Israeli action in 2006 in lebanon;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Lebanon_War said:
The Israeli actions followed attacks from militants of Hezbollah, which left five Israeli soldiers dead and two kidnapped.

That does not mean I support the Israeli's when they 'overreact' like they have done then (nor in 2009 in Gaza with that horrible white phosphorous bullshit). I actually complain to any Israeli's i meet online about this, and have written mossad directly about this as well.

Wasn't usa use of agent orange and nspalms in Vietnam any different from terrorism .

What about using nuke against jaoanese civilians or firebombing Tokyo?

I wouldn't have gone to war in Vietnam at all, I'd let it have turned communist.

Aside from what I said earlier about asymettrical force, I don't want to focus solely on what previous generations have done. I prefer to look at the present and the future.

What about depleted uranium in iraq ?

Another weapon that may be banned as far as I'm concerned. I'll put it on my list of things to remind the Americans and Israelis about ok.
 
.
Before the US invasion or after? And where are you getting your reports from? Don't you think you would be fed news that suits the west by media that is indeed controlled & owned by the Jews (over 90% of all media)? And while you go search for stuff, let me tell you how peaceful Iraq was before the US invasion. It was a prosperous country where everyone feared Saddam and hence everyone lived by the law.

Jeez, that sounds like you support dictatorships that rule by fear...?

The US annihilated the peace, spread weapons and 'just' causes for infighting and is also directly responsible for millions of Iraqi deaths!

Yea, read this please;

http://strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/20130806.aspx said:
August 6, 2013: Corruption in Afghanistan can be astonishing at times. That’s because Afghans consider stealing from foreigners to be a laudable goal and this is a tradition that goes back thousands of years. An excellent example of this can be seen by a recent effort by some Afghan customs officials to scam the U.S. government out of over $70 million. This was basically an organized extortion effort carried out by customs officials. It first appeared in June, when American equipment (vehicles and cargo containers) leaving the country were halted at the Afghan border by demands for a document proving the equipment had entered Afghanistan. If this document was not available (and it never was), payment of a $1,000 fine (per violation) would allow the item to pass. This in itself was absurd because a 2002 agreement between Afghanistan and the United States exempted American military equipment from anything of this nature. Senior customs officials replied that the 2002 agreement was unfair and no longer applied. At this point the situation was becoming surreal and negotiations continued as U.S. officials climbed the Afghan government chain of command, finding that the original scammers had, as is usually the case, promised all their superiors a piece of the action and all were doing their best to make the extortion plan work. Finally the U.S. agreed, but with the understanding that these fines could be paid but that the amount would be deducted from foreign aid, plus large processing fees and fines. Sensing the game was up, the scam collapsed.

Many of these scams succeed, again and again. One of the best examples of this is the “dead goat scam” in which villagers lie about who was killed by a NATO bomb in order to obtain more compensation money, and to avoid Taliban retribution. This one is quite common and works like this. Often, when a smart bomb gets dropped in an isolated location (which describes most of Afghanistan), and there is any chance of civilian casualties the locals will often make a fuss about seeking to find who was hurt or killed. The village elders insist that outsiders (as in U.S. military personnel investigating the damage) stay away during this trying time. Even the foreign soldiers and Afghan police are put off (after a quick search for Taliban bodies, documents, and equipment is completed). Being good *******, the villagers bury the dead before sunset of the same day. The next day, the elders will claim as many civilian dead, killed by smart bombs, as they think they can get away with. Sometimes additional graves get a dead goat or other animal, so the proper stench permeates the mound of earth. Digging up graves is also against Islamic law, so the elders know the foreign troops have to take their word for it. The elders also know that the foreign troops, depending on nationality, will pay $1,000-$5,000 compensation per dead civilian. Not only is there a big payday, but the Taliban appreciate the bad publicity directed at the foreigners and usually show their appreciation by cutting this village or valley some slack in the future. The villages encourage this by offering the local Taliban a cut of the compensation money.

This scam works because there aren't many public records in Afghanistan. The only ones who know exactly who lives in a village are the people there and the elders speak for everyone. Investigators have a hard time interrogating individuals because the elders, and everyone there, has a vested interest in not being found out. Sometimes the elders get greedy. For example, despite an intensive investigation into a 2008 bombing in Azizabad (outside Heart), the villagers got paid for over 90 dead. Investigators, piecing together what information they could, were certain that there were only 15 dead civilians (plus Taliban). But you can't touch the graves, and even questioning the veracity of the claims gets you howls of indignation.
 
.
Simple answer.

Arabs are the founders of Islam. They are the nucleus of the religion, and therefore hold the most radical and fundamentalist population.

The further away you go from the Muslim mainland, the less radical the population. Take Bangladesh, Albania, Malaysia, Bosnia, Turkey, or Kazakhstan as examples.
 
.
These days democratically elected governments cause more terrorism than terrorists themselves... But no one mentions that..
 
.
Why So Many Terrorists Are Arabs ? Foreign intervention is the anwser. If you have a situation where Arab countries are being bombed, invaded, sanctions that kills childrens are being impose, men being raped, entire families being shot at foreigners set up road block and checkpoints while most of the soldiers who perpetrated these acts gets off scott free. Your land is being occupied and most of your hated leaders are the sock puppets of outside powers. When you see all these acts being perpetrated against your people what do you do as a individual, as a person or even as a human being ? You fight back anyway you can. And when you do your are called a terrorist and a fanatic. The reason perhabs why other Muslims don't engage in such activities is perhabs they don't suffer the same treatment being meaded out against the Arabs. So why are the Arabs then singled out for such treatments ? A big part of it is because of economic interest ie oil and because of ideological and emotional reasons like Israel. I believe if the Arabs or any other people left alone they will find their own ways. They will make mistakes and its a process of two steps forward and one step back ie trial and error. China went through a similar period in the 19th century where the country was invaded and humiliated by foreign powers. That has let to the rise of the Boxers at the turn of the 20th century. These are people who believes that performing certain rituals they can make themselves invulnerable to guns and knives and then proceded to fight the foreign invaders. Of course that has led to another defeat for China. China was only able to develop itself after they shook off foreign domination. Today the foreigners are now allowed back into China again but under China's terms.

And the hashish killers are a response to the crusaders from Europe.
 
.
The mission in somalia is according to US, NATO Allies Prepare New Invasion Of Somalia >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Winds about overthrowing the al shabaab "government". Somalia's neighbors asked for this intervention, NATO is only providing military assistance and training as far as I can tell.

According to Al-Shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ;

So, al shabaab is a direct affiliate of alQuada. While some muslims may call fundamentalistic islam a functional government, we here in the west can not, primarily for these two reasons;
- they too often engage in terrorism
- they impose socially- and culturally-restrictive islamic values on the entire population they control

when I talked about Somali , I never meant today , I meant far before that , I meant the coup backed by foreigners in 1991 that resulted in today Anarchy

Rebellion and ouster

After fallout from the unsuccessful Ogaden campaign, Barre's administration began arresting government and military officials under suspicion of participation in an abortive 1978 coup d'état.[32][33] Most of the people who had allegedly helped plot the putsch were summarily executed.[34] However, several officials managed to escape abroad and started to form the first of various dissident groups dedicated to ousting Barre's regime by force.[35]

A new constitution was promulgated in 1979 under which elections for a People's Assembly were held. However, Barre's Somali Revolutionary Socialist Party politburo continued to rule.[11] In October 1980, the SRSP was disbanded, and the Supreme Revolutionary Council was re-established in its place.[13] By that time, the moral authority of Barre's ruling Supreme Revolutionary Council had begun to weaken. Many Somalis were becoming disillusioned with life under military dictatorship. The regime was further weakened in the 1980s as the Cold War drew to a close and Somalia's strategic importance was diminished. The government became increasingly totalitarian, and resistance movements, supported by Ethiopia's communist Derg administration, sprang up across the country. This eventually led in 1991 to the outbreak of the civil war, the toppling of Barre's regime and the disbandment of the Somali National Army (SNA). Among the militia groups that led the rebellion were the Somali Salvation Democratic Front (SSDF), United Somali Congress (USC), Somali National Movement (SNM) and the Somali Patriotic Movement (SPM), together with the non-violent political oppositions of the Somali Democratic Movement (SDM), the Somali Democratic Alliance (SDA) and the Somali Manifesto Group (SMG).

Many of the opposition groups subsequently began competing for influence in the power vacuum that followed the ouster of Barre's regime. In the south, armed factions led by USC commanders General Mohamed Farah Aidid and Ali Mahdi Mohamed, in particular, clashed as each sought to exert authority over the capital.[36]

and then
Somalia: Another CIA-backed coup blows up | Global Research

lets just say it's the exact fate of Syria if the terrorist win this conflict , its the exact thin that happened to Afghanistan its the fate that Iraq face if the situation there get escalated and go out of control

aren't those foreign countries which interfered in those countries and destroyed the life f several generation examples of Terrorists
 
.
Back
Top Bottom