What's new

Why Russia's military adventures worry Europe (CNN)

Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By Ivan Watson, Antonia Mortensen and Jeffrey Kehl, CNN

Riga, Latvia (CNN)Janis Garisons isn't surprised when he hears allegations of Russian hacks targeting the recent US presidential election.

"Some things you discovered in your pre-election campaign, we've been seeing it already for years," he says.
"They've been keeping us awake for twenty-five years," he tells CNN. "We're facing Russian propaganda, information warfare and even psychological warfare almost daily."

Garisons is a top official in the defense ministry of Latvia, a small Baltic country that was ruled for nearly a half century by the Kremlin.

When asked for a response, Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for Russian foreign minister told CNN: "Why didn't Latvia inform Russia about it through the appropriate channels?"
This year, Latvia celebrated a quarter century of regaining independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. But even now, as a part of the European Union as well as a member of the NATO military alliance, the threat from Moscow still lingers.

Colonel Ilmars Lejins of the Latvian Armed Forces says he considers Latvia's enormous Russian neighbor his primary threat.

"Our neighbor to the East has shown his intents and capability of disrespecting international law and treaty obligations," Lejins says. "So I must consider that in my military planning."

161219155809-02-russia-baltics-latvia-1991-exlarge-169.jpg

Civilians gather outside a government building barricaded against potential attack by Soviet troops in Riga, Latvia,
on January 21, 1991.


Enter Trump

Tensions in eastern Europe have been ratcheting up ever since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, and the US military presence in the region has increased significantly.
But the election of Donald Trump has thrown the Baltic States, including Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (who rely heavily on US protection), into a great deal of uncertainty.


During the campaign, Trump outlined a sharp break in US foreign policy tradition, suggesting the US wouldn't defend NATO allies, including the Baltic states, against Russian aggression if they haven't "fulfilled their obligation to us."

This rhetoric, combined with his public admiration for Russian President Vladimir Putin, has left many in Europe concerned that a new Cold War with Putin is coming.

Publicly, officials in Baltic countries are taking a wait-and-see approach. They stress that they have dramatically increased defense expenditures for the next several years while reminding the US that they have contributed troops to US-led military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

161219161532-05-russia-baltics-georgia-conflict-exlarge-169.jpg

A Russian armoured vehicle passes a house set on fire by seperatist militia during the conflict between Georgia
and Russia, on August 18, 2008.


Former Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili, who famously fought and lost a war against Russia in 2008, predicts the next several months could be particularly tense.

"Baltic countries are so vulnerable," Saakashvili told CNN from Kiev, the capital of Ukraine, where he is forming a local political party.

161219161634-06-russia-baltics-georgia-conflict-exlarge-169.jpg

A woman reacts after separatist militia destroyed much of the village of Tkviavi, Georgia, on August 7, 2008.
The Ossetian separatist movement sparked Russian intervention in neighboring Georgia, escalating the affair
into a military conflict.


"We see that the military potential of these three countries (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia) cannot match, in any way, the Russian military. And the problem is: I don't see large European powers coming to their help."

How long will Trump's Russian honeymoon last?

On the defensive

In a snowy field in Latvia, cannons lob artillery shells at distant targets. A pair of Blackhawk helicopters land, and soldiers from the US Army's 173rd Airborne Brigade pour out, firing a rocket attached to a long cord laced with explosives. It detonates, a simulation of how soldiers would blow a path through a deadly minefield in the event of a conflict.

US troops are performing military maneuvers with the Latvian military and a platoon of soldiers from Slovenia as part of a series of joint exercises called "Atlantic Resolve."

161219162047-09-russia-baltics-latvian-military-exlarge-169.jpg

Latvian soldiers take part in live-fire exercises at the Adazi military base outside Riga, Latvia, on December 9, 2014.


"The origins were in response to Russian activity in 2014, when the strategic situation changed," said Colonel Gregory Anderson, who monitored this exercise with his local counterpart Colonel Lejins.
Anderson was referring to Russia's lightning-swift occupation and annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea.

To confuse and then push Ukrainian troops out of the region, Russia deployed so-called "little green men," well-disciplined Russian forces who wore uniforms without insignia or flags identifying their country of origin.


161219161945-08-russia-baltics-ukraine-exlarge-169.jpg

Armed men wearing no identifying insignia guard a government building on March 3, 2014, in Simferopol, Ukraine.


The well-choreographed operation has served as a wake-up call to the new strength and sophistication of the Russian military.

How small states prepare for cyber-war

On the lookout for potential enemies If a conflict suddenly exploded with Russia, Latvian commanders say their forces would present little more than a "speed bump" to an advancing Russian military.

"Therefore, the US presence here is very important to deter Russian attempts or simply to avoid miscalculation," says Garisons, Latvia's secretary of state.

Latvian officials say, Russia has amassed two armies with an estimated 200,000 troops on the other side of the border. Five years ago, Russia reestablished a helicopter base with scores of aircraft at a location a short drive from the Latvian border.


To protect itself and its population of nearly two million people, Latvia has only 5,000 professional troops as well as a much larger force of volunteer National Guards.

"We need to be a good speed bump that takes out the muffler of the enemy so that it is loud enough that there is no question that this is military aggression against one NATO member," Colonel Lejins explains. "Then the activation of (Article 5) occurs."

Under Article 5 of the NATO charter, an attack on one member is considered an attack on all countries in the alliance and requires an active response.

Russian doorstep in Europe
Next, we drive cross country from Latvia, across Lithuania and into Kaliningrad, an exclave of Russian territory sandwiched between Poland and the Baltics, cut off from mainland Russia.


At the end of World War II, Soviet Red Army soldiers wrenched control of this territory from Nazi Germany. For decades, it was a heavily militarized region, closed off to foreigners.

161220173953-11-russia-baltics-kaliningrad-wwii-exlarge-169.jpg

Russian soldiers fight to take control of Kaliningrad from German troops during World War II.


The region lurched into the headlines last fall after Russia confirmed reports it deployed nuclear-capable Iskender missiles to Kaliningrad.

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov defended Russia's right to deploy weapons to its sovereign territory in an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour last October.

"They moved NATO infrastructure next to our borders," Lavrov said. "And this is not United States territory."

161219161418-04-russia-baltics-kaliningrad-church-exlarge-169.jpg

In this file photo, a view of Kaliningrad's gothic cathedral serves as a reminder of the town's historical connection to Germany before World War II.


In many ways, Kaliningrad is a historical curiosity. The streets of the main city, which was known in German times as Konigsberg, are lined with grand examples of old German architecture alongside grim, concrete Soviet apartment blocks.

Here, some Russians also expressed hope about the next US government.

"With the change of leadership in the US we are hoping for an improvement in the situation," says Konstantin Smernov, a 53-year-old former lieutenant in the Soviet Navy who now works as a real estate agent. "Confrontation isn't good for anybody."


Western governments imposed economic sanctions on Russia after the seizure of Crimea in 2014. In restaurants and in homes here, many Russians said those measures contributed to a broader economic crisis that set in after the plunge in oil prices in recent years. Oil and natural gas are two of Russia's most important exports and the backbone of the country's economy.

Those sanctions, combined with a move last summer to remove visa-free travel for Kaliningrad residents traveling to neighboring Poland, have some here concerned about the former Soviet citadel's increasing isolation.

Why Russia has been ramping up hostile action

Anna Shugatova was born after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Her dream was to find a job that would allow her to travel. But the 23-year-old, who moved to Kaliningrad from her home in Siberia to pursue a master's degree in linguistics, says that dream is now in doubt.

"I don't know if I will be able to travel soon. There are tensions between countries," Shugatova said.

Echoes of the Cold War
But several Russians say they've found one advantage to living in an enclave with relatively easy access to countries like Poland and Lithuania. Visitors can purchase and smuggle in foreign foods that are now banned in Russia.

"We are back to the days of smuggling cheese and sausage from abroad," said Igor Pleshkov, a businessman and vocal critic of the Kremlin who describes himself as the sole elected member of the opposition on Kaliningrad's city council.

161219162206-10-russia-baltics-putin-baltiysk-exlarge-169.jpg

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a n even during Navy Day on July 26, 2015, in the militarized garrison
town of Bailtiysk, Russia.


The Russian port of Baltiysk, about a 45-minute drive towards the coast, is still very much a militarized garrison town. Warships from the Russian Navy's Baltic Sea Fleet moor at the town entrance, while rows of olive-green military trucks and armored vehicles can be seen in several nearby compounds.

One of the striking oddities about this region is the dozens of ruined German churches dotting the countryside. These crumbling places of worship stand partially collapsed and empty, symbols of what happened the last time armies fought for control of this part of Europe.



CNN's Alla Eshchenko contributed to this report.

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/23/europe/russia-military-adventures-baltics/
 
Fear Tactics nothing more .. Russian's are not going to Attack Europe anytime soon , they are already too deep into Syria and Crimea and another front will be a Disaster to Russians ..
 
Riga, Latvia (CNN)Janis Garisons isn't surprised when he hears allegations of Russian hacks targeting the recent US presidential election.

I wonder why isn't anyone in Europe worried about annual NAZI, neo-NAZI parades that occur throughout Europe? Not to mention in Latvia? ( Latvian Nazi veterans join controversial annual march ) This tiny 'nazi-proud' country even goes as far as threatening Russia, a country that lost 20 million people fighting the NAZI's, and begins treating its ethnic Russian citizens as trash, stripping them of their rights, and destroying monuments.....

Of course there is a heavy anti-Russia 'propaganda' campaign going on, but still people shouldn't be so lazy to believe everything.
 
Propaganda. Europe is worried about Islamic terror,ISIS and refugees. WWII and cold war his history
 
Enough of this nonsense. Russia withdrew its troops from Europe absolutely voluntarily. If Russia wanted to occupy someone, than in a month there would be another wall in Berlin. And no one could stop this.
 
Enough of this nonsense. Russia withdrew its troops from Europe absolutely voluntarily. If Russia wanted to occupy someone, than in a month there would be another wall in Berlin. And no one could stop this.

You are right, but Western Russiaphobia will never end. Especially when Uncle Sam keeps stoking the fire.
 
You are right, but Western Russiaphobia will never end. Especially when Uncle Sam keeps stoking the fire.

European Leaders are pushing their people into hate , they are doing everything to create this Fear in their minds that Muslims are the enemies , Arabs are the Enemies , Russians are the Enemies .. they want to just deal with North/South America all others are their Enemies ... countries are in deep shit they don't even have breathing time from their own shi* let alone conspire against Europe ..
 
European Leaders are pushing their people into hate , they are doing everything to create this Fear in their minds that Muslims are the enemies , Arabs are the Enemies , Russians are the Enemies .. they want to just deal with North/South America all others are their Enemies ... countries are in deep shit they don't even have breathing time from their own shi* let alone conspire against Europe ..

Europe just tows the US line. The real problem is the US view of the world. They are only interested in establishing their hegemony at all cost. Europe simply follows. Europeans feel indebted for US support during WWII. They cannot look Uncle Sam straight in the eye.
 
Europe just tows the US line. The real problem is the US view of the world. They are only interested in establishing their hegemony at all cost. Europe simply follows. Europeans feel indebted for US support during WWII. They cannot look Uncle Sam straight in the eye.
Europe is under American occupation for now. When the occupation is over, everything will change.
 
European Leaders are pushing their people into hate , they are doing everything to create this Fear in their minds that Muslims are the enemies , Arabs are the Enemies , Russians are the Enemies .. they want to just deal with North/South America all others are their Enemies ... countries are in deep shit they don't even have breathing time from their own shi* let alone conspire against Europe ..
Yes, and you would know about this how? I live in Europe. There is no predominent anti-arab or anti-Russian sentiment, nor are 'European leaders' [< now there's a diverse and ever changing collection, if ever there was one!] pushing anything.
Speaking as Dutch, it wasn't the French that shot down MH17, now was it?

Europe is under American occupation for now. When the occupation is over, everything will change.
Balony! There are fewer US troops in Europe then ever since 1950s. Currently around 95k. Of which almost 40,000 are NAVY (associated with US EUCOM structure i.e. not combat forces). There are some 27,000 Army and 25,000 Air Force personnel.

20111126_WOC108.gif


Mostly in Germany, where key Army logistics hubs are. United States European Command (EUCOM)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_deployments#Europe

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/10/global-us-troop-deployment-1950-2003
http://www.hoover.org/sites/default...1_-_kane_-_decline_of_american_engagement.pdf

As of 2009, there were 11,600 Russian ground troops based in the Kaliningrad oblast alone, plus additional naval and air force personnel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaliningrad_Oblast#Military

IN 2016 In May, Russia announced plans to put two new [= extra] divisions in the Western region and another in the south. That could be about 30,000 troops
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...y-buildup-in-the-baltic-stokes-invasion-fears
 
Yes, and you would know about this how? I live in Europe. There is no predominent anti-arab or anti-Russian sentiment, nor are 'European leaders' [< now there's a diverse and ever changing collection, if ever there was one!] pushing anything.
Speaking as Dutch, it wasn't the French that shot down MH17, now was it?


Balony! There are fewer US troops in Europe then ever since 1950s. Currently around 95k. Of which almost 40,000 are NAVY (associated with US EUCOM structure i.e. not combat forces). There are some 27,000 Army and 25,000 Air Force personnel.

20111126_WOC108.gif


Mostly in Germany, where key Army logistics hubs are. United States European Command (EUCOM)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_deployments#Europe

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/10/global-us-troop-deployment-1950-2003
http://www.hoover.org/sites/default...1_-_kane_-_decline_of_american_engagement.pdf

As of 2009, there were 11,600 Russian ground troops based in the Kaliningrad oblast alone, plus additional naval and air force personnel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaliningrad_Oblast#Military

IN 2016 In May, Russia announced plans to put two new [= extra] divisions in the Western region and another in the south. That could be about 30,000 troops
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...y-buildup-in-the-baltic-stokes-invasion-fears
When the number of occupation troops has decreased - this is not the occupation? :-)
 
Hahaha. You know very well there is no occupation. And even if there were, it would be far more benign than the military occupations in Eastern Europe by Soviet Union post 1945.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_occupations_by_the_Soviet_Union
Nobody argues that the Soviet Union also had occupied many countries in Europe at the time. But in 1994, last military base in East Germany was closed .
But the United States do not hurry to end the era of occupation in Europe.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom