What's new

why Peaceful muslims are irrelevant and world only view the radicals as representing Islam

May be that's because they

1. Don't deserve the spotlight.
2. Radical Hindus/Buddhists don't build cells all over the world, declare caliphates, call for death of non Hindus/non Buddhists the world over.
3. They don't call for the destruction of Palestine or any other state.

1. Says you
2. Don't need to Hinduism and Buddhism have only regional reach compared to Abrahamic religions, caliphate has nothing to do with non Muslims as it is a Muslim concept, and tell that to those who were killed by radical Hindus and still being killed by radical Buddhists today.
3. Like I said only because their reach is regional and so their motives lie in their respective countries.
 
.
1. Says you
2. Don't need to Hinduism and Buddhism have only regional reach compared to Abrahamic religions, caliphate has nothing to do with non Muslims as it is a Muslim concept, and tell that to those who were killed by radical Hindus and still being killed by radical Buddhists today.
3. Like I said only because their reach is regional and so their motives lie in their respective countries.

OK then we must put same tactics in use in regions within our reach. Our house our rules. Gujarat was a great start.
 
. .
Shut the hell up amit.

Better shut these guys up.

http://www.newsweek.com/pro-isis-demonstrators-call-death-jews-hague-262064

isis-protest-hague.jpg


Like I said in one of my posts in this thread: Using Democracy to kill Democracy and then they wonder why they are being projected as villains.
 
.
.
Too far from me, maybe the police should shut them up in most countries supporting terrorist organizations is a punishable offense.

Will not that be seen as a discriminatory act by these people? They become the biggest advocates of Democracy, Free Will and Secularism at times.

ISIS supporters using democracy to send a message. How Cute.
 
.
It does not matter if 95% of muslims are peaceful because they are tainted by the large amount of extremists, I dont care if 95% are good people when the 5% who arent want to destroy and enslave you into their archaic way of thinking. All it takes is a small number of people to change peoples mindset with a mob mentality that can bring about destruction on a worldwide scale (i.e Nazi Germany). Almost all the muslims I know are decent people but if theres a few bad ones then there always will be, I dont have to worry about a Buddhist or Hindu trying to kill off anyone who thinks different to them so when thats a consideration with Muslims, it ruins it for all of them.
 
.
Too far from me, maybe the police should shut them up in most countries supporting terrorist organizations is a punishable offense.


Whom will deserve punishment if your terrorized by your own shadow. ? Establishing a pure Islamic state is not act of terrorism .
 
.
1. Says you
2. Don't need to Hinduism and Buddhism have only regional reach compared to Abrahamic religions, caliphate has nothing to do with non Muslims as it is a Muslim concept, and tell that to those who were killed by radical Hindus and still being killed by radical Buddhists today.
3. Like I said only because their reach is regional and so their motives lie in their respective countries.
Like I said - Bingo. :tup:

Hindu and Buddhist radicals fall far short of the standards set by al Qaida or ISIS.
There was no sectarian violence in Iraq of Saddam.
Was it because the Government itself carried out pogroms? :D
I am talking about anti Shia and anti Kurd 'operations'...
 
Last edited:
.
Quote of the day my friend.

There are plenty of other threads to rant about the west, Modi, Israel etc, this one talks about Islamic jihad / terrorism / extremism / fundamentalism / indoctrination / radicalization. If you have nothing to say about it other than divert the topic to everywhere else then there is no benefit to draw out of the discussion.
 
.
There are plenty of other threads to rant about the west, Modi, Israel etc, this one talks about Islamic jihad / terrorism / extremism / fundamentalism / indoctrination / radicalization. If you have nothing to say about it other than divert the topic to everywhere else then there is no benefit to draw out of the discussion.

I discussed the particular issue in my previous comments. You are playing with words. If you think my comments don't fully explain the tide of extremism then please do add your valuable opinion.

It settles everything. When the US pastor burnt Q'uran he was well within his rights so was the guy who painted that cartoon.

Another one bites the dust.
 
.
1) 1% of peace ful & 99% criminals
2)any one heard christians cutting any soldiers head,kidnaping poor women,suicide bombing dont consider 30 Year back any latest event.....(for relegion)
 
.
1) 1% of peace ful & 99% criminals
2)any one heard christians cutting any soldiers head,kidnaping poor women,suicide bombing dont consider 30 Year back any latest event.....(for relegion)

When a christian do such thing he is called criminal not terrorist .
 
.
He is not doing it for relegious cause
i never heard a christian suicide bomber cutting soldiers head and kidnaping women because he thinkis bible said so
 
.
He is not doing it for relegious cause
i never heard a christian suicide bomber cutting soldiers head and kidnaping women because he thinkis bible said so

Haha, I am surprised by your approach . Please try to educate your self on christian religion , history and relationship with Islam,conflicts / crusades and current wars before coming on conclusions.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom