What's new

Why Pakistan is crucial to world stability

Adnan,

Yes, See the point is These people are bound by Rules of engagement when caught by authorities can be proscuted, at the same time Non-state Actors are as medival as it can get. It is exactly like how Koran is guide to Religious Following for some Humans, similar it is a guide.

I am sure Indian and Pakistan army has done that, I am sure US must have done that too, but it is just a small portion. There is a difference between Collateral Damage and Terror. Military doesnt achieve anything by bombing a Market, while terror " freedom fighters" gets anrachy chaos, something they need to thrive in.

Yes, it's a guide, but no one follows it really. My teacher once told me,

"Even a righteous man has committed at least one sin in his life time, no one is free from sin"

No matter, what good moral and ethics he follows he does a crime, but the cases we hear are those that have been caught and brought forward, tell me has justice really been served when a service man has killed 12 members of a family and raping a girl and he's sentenced to prison? While he still lives, after killing murder? And on top of that using DU, and I'm sure you have seen pictures of what happens, I have personally seen children of Ex-soldiers from First gulf war who have deformed children, just image those dropped in Iraq what is happening there. But this is a issue to discuss in another time.

But what I'm saying is these rules are to benefit a select few, and no matter what the person does he should be bought under the court of law, cause if you don't your no better than the person who did the crime.

And no bro their ain't no small portion of crimes and rules broken by this so called "Coalition of the willing".

About the military and freedom fighters we can get into a big debate but I rather skip it this time.
 
.
No way, US are doing the right thing, Why dont they just form an Army and fight them, rather than exploding bombs in Markets, I rather have US Army killing any people with those tendencies.

You want the U.S to kill innocent civilians? They are an army, a militia. They are doing nothing less than what U.S is doing, fighting, for what they believe in.
 
. . .
Militia dont bomb Markets

Its a war. It should be understandable.

USAF has attacked sacred places like mosques (unintentionally of course), let alone markets.. :rolleyes:

Yet i dont blame them.
 
.
US could have inflicted as much collateral damage in the first day of war as has been committed TILL NOW if it wanted to. Rather it is trying its best to avoid such incidents. They are afterall at war, and thus what some people here are saying is completely wrong.
 
.
Exactly, They could inflict more, if they really didnt care, level the whole block with Naplam or something, It is quite hard for people to show restraint in the face of such unethical cowardly attack.
 
.
How well could a country with a considerably less resources sustain the loss of 500 troops and maintenance of 80K on a volatile border that harms even the best equipped military?

Well Pakistan has been sacrificing a lot of troops and resources for the sake of kashmir. And i never heard them complaining about it. So why is that when they lose 500 soldiers in NWFP they start crying foul.
 
.
US could have inflicted as much collateral damage in the first day of war as has been committed TILL NOW if it wanted to. Rather it is trying its best to avoid such incidents. They are afterall at war, and thus what some people here are saying is completely wrong.

Yes both sides r on war, u accept that
As again and again pointed out by webby as well, "its an open war", if bombing a mosque or wedding to be called collateral dammage, then i would call those people bombing the markets the same. "Collateral damage".

The only difference is in way of fighting and available resources.
 
.
No way, US are doing the right thing, Why dont they just form an Army and fight them, rather than exploding bombs in Markets, I rather have US Army killing any people with those tendencies.

So in other words you would welcome US soldiers into Assam and Jharkand aswell to end terrorist activites? :tup:
 
. . .
Well Pakistan has been sacrificing a lot of troops and resources for the sake of kashmir. And i never heard them complaining about it. So why is that when they lose 500 soldiers in NWFP they start crying foul.

Pakistan has been sacrificing alot of troops and resources over Kashmir as well as on india's border for the last 6 decades and they are crying over that too, for a long time as they have the right to do so. No wonder india is doing the same, plus pakistan has never thought of putting that much soldiers near afghanistan, a loss is always a loss. Tell me wont u cry over the death of ur own soldiers.
 
.
Pakistan has been sacrificing alot of troops and resources over Kashmir as well as on india's border for the last 6 decades and they are crying over that too, for a long time as they have the right to do so. No wonder india is doing the same, plus pakistan has never thought of putting that much soldiers near afghanistan, a loss is always a loss. Tell me wont u cry over the death of ur own soldiers.

That was not my point. Pakistan has lost a way lot more soldiers and resources fighting for kashmir.

While the mere loss of 500 soldiers , trying to protect your own homeland is way too much for you guys.

Got the point?

Why is the Pakistanis are willing to take risk with respect to Kashmir while in the case of NWFP they hesitate.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom