Why Pak DID NOT oppose Indo-US nuclear deal

[SnIPeR Xr]

Its said that cry only when your tears have worth

At this state, crying would only add up to floods.

500 AMRAAMS.
18 new blk52's.
Negotiations for more Blk 52's.
8 Naval frigates.
12 P3c orions.
Kerri logar bill.
Recent 2bn $ military AId.


We all know how worth your tears are.

 

[mjnaushad]

500 AMRAAMS.
18 new blk52's.
Negotiations for more Blk 52's.
8 Naval frigates.
12 P3c orions.
Kerri logar bill.
Recent 2bn $ military AId.


We all know how worth your tears are.

42 MLU for F16s
1000 LGB
2400 TOW 2
Mi17s
and after 2015

AH1Z and AH64 are awaiting for negotiations

hehehe

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Its said that cry only when your tears have worth

At this state, crying would only add up to floods.

In ur case ur tears and rants are totally a waste and useless.... indians cryin infront of white house against the PAF F-16 deal is afine example frm recent past..... or cries frm delhi which again US didnt give a shyt about.

Also crying doesnt make u a big man nor do tears have any worth...... it only makes u look like a sissy.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

42 MLU for F16s
1000 LGB
2400 TOW 2
Mi17s
and after 2015

AH1Z and AH64 are awaiting for negotiations

hehehe

U still forgot the=
32-36 more bells
Tactical UAVs
115 M109A5 and more upgrade kits.... etc

 

[Kinetic]

Just as Indians were barking at Sino-Pak Deal but Indians could not do anything.So Pakistan made the right choice to not look like a fool (like India ).

US was 'barking' more than India!!! When the dial was signed that you are asking India could not do anything? As far as we know China could not get support for it during Christ Church NSG meeting. Even China also seems hesitant about spelling out its intentions during the meeting. China was asked by NSG members to spell out its intentions in this matter and it didn't do that.

 

[Hulk]

Has anyone noticed the change in which Pakistani leaders talks about nuke now?
Before they use to talk lot agressively, like Kashmir can be nuclear flashpoint etc, now they are saying it is only for deterence, wonder why?

It is because they have realized by saying all those agressive thing they have it it difficult for other countries to share defence technologies with them, including nuke. India was smart around this, while Indians hardly say how many nukes we have, you can see the contrast from Pakistan.

See how it impacts you.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Has anyone noticed the change in which Pakistani leaders talks about nuke now?
Before they use to talk lot agressively, like Kashmir can be nuclear flashpoint etc, now they are saying it is only for deterence, wonder why?

It is because they have realized by saying all those agressive thing they have it it difficult for other countries to share defence technologies with them, including nuke. India was smart around this, while Indians hardly say how many nukes we have, you can see the contrast from Pakistan.

See how it impacts you.

They still say Kashmir can be a nuclear flash point.... and its for deternce ....

Unlike genuises who talk abt being ready for limited nuclear wars

 

[barcelona]

so you take my words as the answer to this situation...thanks for accepting my view.

secondly...the purpose of opening a thread is to have a discussion..I kept my view on the topic....you keep yours or move ahead no need to give lectures to me.

Actually this is the perfect answer which u gave as i saw lot of threads in which selective qoute were taken like the one of Zalmay Khalilzad abt Pakistan concern regarding baluchistan
If u wouldn't have given this answer i would have thought it to be a lame n jingoistic thread