Whosoever was responsible..
The shameful thing is that 5, not 20, not 40.. FIVE.. men were able to hold a military base hostage for over 20 hours..
Killed multiple military personnel.. and caused a loss of millions of dollars.
Yet the Naval chief comes in the next day in his BMW 7 series(with the extra security options).. flag fluttering .. steps out in his pristine white uniform.. and looks around and leaves. Perhaps the money that went into the BMW might have bought a few more cameras.. more training. more fencing.
The Navy blamed the AF.. they blamed somebody else..
This is the ineptitude that has come over the Pakistani military.
Well lack of Night vision visors and equipment for special ops - I mean our soldiers had no visors they had visors and sniper rifles and garrisoned building
Even if the buildings were operated by limited people but they had the strategic advantage
a) Safety in night
b) Building to protect them
c) Weapons
d) Vision in night
The tactic, mentality and look and feel of this "Project" was very similar to what happened in neighboring country
I checked some news articles where our Military requested Visors and Night vision for our usage and nothing specific was mentioned from other side.
I think if we really look at "Motives" - Beneficiaries from whole episode , I mean the Big picture I can only conclude
a) I mean Mumbai thing was done , just at the peak of Indian - Pakistani dialog
Would Indian then agree to pressurize Pakistan ? No how could USA get India to put pressure
on Pakistan's Eastern Front ? Of course if something nasty like Mumbai was orchestrated
out come : Pressure on East , USA forces Pakistan to use its military to go into FATA displace 3 million civilians
Who carried out the attack rouges - Money / Green cards / Political Help in their organization's cause/ Funded by Contractor
b) P3 Orion Navy Base :
Comes right after Abbottabad - who was planning to attack or invade Pakistan during that time - USA
I mean Obama has openly stated that intent many times , we just have shrugged off that intent
Who really benefits ? USA because they are the only nation interested in going into Pakistan to build a base
Who carried out the attacks well stated that it was some Anti Russian rouges ? Since when did Pakistan had problem with
Anti Russian rouges ?
Who carried out the attack rouges - Money / Green cards / Political Help in their organization's cause/ Funded by Contractor
I mean lets use , common sense , its after the "RAID" / operation in Abbotabad , our Nation let alone army was alert
There was checking all over streets , and checkpoints so few "Individuals" in the shadow of night using "Stealth" would come / land so close that all the check points were bypassed? Equipped with visors and vision equipment that even our own soldiers did not had ?
We had to wait until morning
Its very interesting - how some of us , quickly don't consider similarities
a) Use of stealth obvious (not boat rowing , or swimming as it is suggested)
back then no one knew about the existence of a stealth helicopter
I mean how would they reach shore to shore in a night ?
b) Similarity in tactics
c) Looking at the beneficiary , behind the scene and immediate aftermath
Also is it just me of there are lately less Bombings in Pakistan since Pakistan kicked out CIA contractors
I mean I am not gonna suggest the obvious but "REALLY"
first it was the states now its India too . 
