What's new

Why is the international media unfair to India?

International media = christian + Muslim media.

I cannot remember a single instance in history when they have been fair to hindus :lol:

This entire video starts on a wrong assumption while ignoring history and reality. Silly girl.
 
.
But c'mon bro.. A eastern European woman in a saree with a Indian surname going on a tangent about how the rest of the world is being unfair to India ? Reeks of some desperate ultra nationalist vain attempt to propagate half truths.. I cant fathom the motivation though

I have a feeling she is probably a member of some roided up hare krishna like cult (they are quite active in Poland, Russia and few other places...even dated one from Hungary few years back till I realised she was too nutty basically).

The critical thinking and analysis by such is quite lacking (given the overt bias/payroll whatever)....like adding too much sugar to something rather than letting the natural flavour come through...and thus overall video seems quite tacky and strange to me.....but the anti-MSM message does resonate to me and I have found the overall theme from this to be personally true.

For example there was indeed a concerted effort by several western thinkers in predicting the failure of India in a matter of years (as low key as political disintegration to massive outright starvation) after India's independence. That legacy remains entrenched in a lot of the media, albeit somewhat toned down today (given the grandiose predictions have all been disproven). Then you read up a lot of things that are still covered up that were done by the British to India (Macaulay's education "reforms" + overt proselytising with white man burden themes etc etc.)...and then truly understand what India had done to it that makes it hard to get the wheel rolling again like it used to.

Thats why many people who actually live and experience India more personally for an extended period of time (after coming from the outside)...people like Mark Tully of the BBC and a few friends I know (that are balanced and remain staunchly neutral)....grasp the inner resilience of India much better than those sitting outside and dependent on the media for all their information about it. That aspect is very true of what she says, you cannot really judge something till you have experienced it enough personally for yourself....and its very hard to put into words (and thus her effort is quite doomed from the onset I feel even if she was more balanced).
 
.
If you read bbc reporting(online), its particularly harsh on china.... but India is treated much more fairly... they will give a negative spin to chinese story but positive to Indian... not sure about american media.
 
.
If you read bbc reporting(online), its particularly harsh on china.... but India is treated much more fairly... they will give a negative spin to chinese story but positive to Indian... not sure about american media.

You are such a shameless lying false flagger. Seriously have some basic decency you disheveled loser.
 
.
Bbc is actually afraid of posting negative stories on China. They know that the Chinese will chuck their reporters out and ban their media.
Also the brits are sucking up to the chinese nowdays for investment and their media works in sync with their govt , so wont rock the boat.
In the case of India , its plain and simple jealousy at Indias progress . Cant stand their former slaves coming up , so always highlight the negatives. Actually DM is better than BBC in its reporting on India.
 
.
You are such a shameless lying false flagger. Seriously have some basic decency you disheveled loser.
HE is partly true western media is way too critical in their coverage of china. Also he is not a false flagger.
 
.
I have a feeling she is probably a member of some roided up hare krishna like cult (they are quite active in Poland, Russia and few other places...even dated one from Hungary few years back till I realised she was too nutty basically).

The critical thinking and analysis by such is quite lacking (given the overt bias/payroll whatever)....like adding too much sugar to something rather than letting the natural flavour come through...and thus overall video seems quite tacky and strange to me.....but the anti-MSM message does resonate to me and I have found the overall theme from this to be personally true.

For example there was indeed a concerted effort by several western thinkers in predicting the failure of India in a matter of years (as low key as political disintegration to massive outright starvation) after India's independence. That legacy remains entrenched in a lot of the media, albeit somewhat toned down today (given the grandiose predictions have all been disproven). Then you read up a lot of things that are still covered up that were done by the British to India (Macaulay's education "reforms" + overt proselytising with white man burden themes etc etc.)...and then truly understand what India had done to it that makes it hard to get the wheel rolling again like it used to.

Thats why many people who actually live and experience India more personally for an extended period of time (after coming from the outside)...people like Mark Tully of the BBC and a few friends I know (that are balanced and remain staunchly neutral)....grasp the inner resilience of India much better than those sitting outside and dependent on the media for all their information about it. That aspect is very true of what she says, you cannot really judge something till you have experienced it enough personally for yourself....and its very hard to put into words (and thus her effort is quite doomed from the onset I feel even if she was more balanced).

Whats been said in that video in general without going in to semantics is common to all post colonial nations.. And yes you're correct mate i myself have been visiting India over the years, and we do have a more balanced point of view

HE is partly true western media is way too critical in their coverage of china. Also he is not a false flagger.

Agreed completely, the amount of aggression and negativity spewed on China and Russia in Western media, Makes whatever they report on the short comings in India inconsequential.. Like i said on the contrary there seem to be a concerted effort to actually promote India, My guess the reason of the massive English speaking viewership both in India and it's diaspora around the world they are now trying to cater to

And just that they allocate a significant portion of their air play to report on India shows the prominence they place in Indian viewership.. Just be happy most other countries never get a mention if there is no natural calamity
 
Last edited:
.
HE is partly true western media is way too critical in their coverage of china. Also he is not a false flagger.

I have read what he posts...it is quite consistently the same agenda by him without even a bit of variation. He has me on ignore after I called him out for it. It is more a message of caution for others that come across him....at one point I thought he was just kidding when making fun of South Indians....nope he kept it up and exposed himself to be a very racist bigoted POS....he is thus a false flagger in my eyes, who's only role here is to sow division among Indian members....and "bootlick" every other opponent of India.

He has no balanced approach, thus gets no more benefit of the doubt from me.
 
.
I cannot remember a single instance in history when they have been fair to hindus :lol:
Indian Media = RSS and Hindutva fascist supporting media houses - E.g. "Chee" (Zee new) news. A Sanghi is a sanghi, he is going to find religion everywhere.
 
.
on the contrary there seem to be a concerted effort to actually promote India
I think thats overstating it a bit but most of the promoting is due to financial reasons specifically corporate promotions.
 
.
No offense but Indian journalists themselves are responsible for that negative attitude western countries have towards india, i'm following some on various social media platforms and sometimes it seems like they're ashamed of their own country. Same thing is happening to us nowadays.
 
.
I think thats overstating it a bit but most of the promoting is due to financial reasons specifically corporate promotions.

Well i'm telling you through Australian perspective, channels here like ABC and SBS have significant coverage on India compared to any other Asian nation maybe bar China for obvious reasons.. Same with British media.. Yes Commercial reasons probably is a major incentive given the massive Indian viewership
 
.
Well i'm telling you through Australian perspective, channels here like ABC and SBS have significant coverage on India compared to any other Asian nation maybe bar China for obvious reasons.. Same with British media.. Yes Commercial reasons probably is a major incentive given the massive Indian viewership
india should invade Australia, it has lots of resources with little hope of defending themselves.
 
. .
No offense but Indian journalists themselves are responsible for that negative attitude western countries have towards india, i'm following some on various social media platforms and sometimes it seems like they're ashamed of their own country. Same thing is happening to us nowadays.
give us some example where indian journalists are ashamed of their country and deliberately show India in negative light... its their job to unearth sh*t(not literally) .. if others have a negative attitude by reading truth, then so be it... if you mean why always more negative news and less positive, well thats how it is world over.
bad news sells.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom