@fatman17
In the light of modern research especially international trend(i am talking about the IIT bombay seminar pics that i posted),a missile with 4-10 MIRVs would require atleast 2-3 tonnes of throw weight.Now the natural question that comes up is- how would pakistan increase the throw weight capacity of their missile? Consideration should be given to various other factors like the absence of a pakistani program to design a cryogenic engine(either STAGED COMBUSTION CYCLE or GAS GENERATOR CYCLE), or industrial maturity of pakistan in the field of composites (composite motor,shroud,and various other structural assembly)- now these are some of the factors that might help increase the throw weight of pakistani missiles
Another aspect of the ICBM is it's survivability(here i am talking about itz mobility and reaction time and not itz capability to overcome potential ABMs)- In that reagrds too,pakistani strategic missiles show a number of complications.some of them are-
1)None of them have been cannisterized(like the way india is cannisterizing A-4,A-5 and A-6 AND chinese DF-31).A cannisterized system drastically reduces the reaction time(and increases the shelf life) of missiles,for instance the reaction time of un-cannisterized agni-5 is close to 30mins whereas the same missile in a TCT-5 cannisterized launcher can be fired in less than 10mins(these figures again were given by none other the DG DRDO)!
2)pakistani strategic missiles still feature external control surfaces- fins,- this would pose a challenge while designing a canister for them(if at all they have such plan)
3)Again we are back to our initial argument i.e pakistani metallurgical research and itz industrial maturity to design a canisterized launching system on a high mobility truck