I though you do understand the world politics . first and second Afghan war both are no less than indirect attacks or in case we did not involve it would have been direct invasion on Pakistan
meaning you saw Afghanistan as a buffer state?
an early warning in case someone decides to go against you?
Tibet was a buffer state to us...by the same measure...
Room for China in Pakistan for operating against whom????????
I thought you understood the world politics too...
2. Leave that to Chinese how much they need Pakistan Indians are in no position to comment on that unless China settles issues with India which is unlikely to the favour of India hence i am sure India is also not going to settle these so soon
I am not issuing a foreign office statement here...it's my observation...you can refute it...but with reason...or we won't touch this if you don't like.
We are investing time and money to see our tiffs with China through...while I can't say the same for Kashmir...we need settlement..and the land being contested for isn't that much...even if you divide AP equally...
Ruskies going into Afghanistan on the call of one group invading the majority and jeopardizing the good links and relations between the two countries was foolishness which result in disintegration of USSR.
It has destabilised the entire region
and your efforts in bringing the to their knees are?
"destabilised the entire region"
shows that it has caused more harm to you than to any other big power.
ahhh so good a bharti at last is seeing US hand too in this Afghan issue/
I have a lot of respect for you...avoid calling me a bharati...it's either an Indian or a Bharatiya...you know that.
I have a fair bit of idea how it worked out...the last CIA ordeal with Afghanistan.
So why US is now being defeated in this modern second part of an Old Afghan war with anti-US fighters having same old weapons while US with almost half of the army from half of the powerful world aka NATO with modern missiles, drones, chinooks and so on???
Is there any other country in the world able to hold two different countries at it's mercy at the same time?
I don't understand why you don't get that the US's strategic goal was to build the nation as it wanted...that is free it from the elements that'd cause America any trouble in the future...they wanted to educate and arm the Afghans...the Afghans are incompetent to work as a field army....they have never had any success in fighting conventional battles...which require some degree of discipline and training...whoever can fire a kalashnikov is fit to join their ranks.
the Americans have also been attacking territories that have been under your control....they surely must have a lot of power to be able to do that..
Because for winning a war against invaders its not only Stingers you need but will to fight for justice
we all have different definitions for justice.and stingers helped.
First of all you from India with massacre of Muslims, Sikhs and Christians and atrocities against own Dalits and human rights violations in Occupied Kashmir you should not be an ideal person to speak about human rights.
but you can...you can right?no body's stopping you.
The only hypocrisy is on your part who is unwilling to point out the human rights violation by those pro-India warlords who are now sitting in Afghan govt.
they are less evil than the Taliban...once there is complete roder everybody should be tried.
US has yet to start any practical proxy against China
I doubt that would happen.