--,-'{@
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 554
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
While talking about this civilization, he only talks about India - which means the same thing.
........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While talking about this civilization, he only talks about India - which means the same thing.
jab tak indian subcontinent main ek bhi gareeb rahega tab tak maoism Gareebon ki aas rahega.I am all for the himsa part, i am upto my gills with this soft secular BS. i would prefer to go the Chinese way, first take out all our internal enemies, the desh drohis, aathankwadhis, the fundamentalists, illegal immigrants and the naxals then plan for the future.
A very interesting write up indeed.
The write up first criticizes the last 1000 years of Indian History and ask the Indian people to learn their lessons from a history which is over 4000 years old.
It blames the invaders and rulers of last 1000 years for all of India's current ills and seeks glory in a period of history which is 4000 years old. It exhorts that India's history lies in Indus Valley Civilization, which is incorrect and is as frivolous as it sounds and even funny to even think about it.
The cradle of IVC lies in Pakistan and Pakistan is the scion of this civilization - not the current India. India may claim a tiny part of this old glory and not the whole of it.
However, I don't understand as to what is new that the author is talking about. This is exactly what the Indians have been saying and doing since last 65 years.
Blaming the current ills on a period of 1000 years of old history is just like becoming an ostrich with head hidden in the sand.
I am not saying that India should not take pride in the history of those people who live in current India, but India may also like to take pride in what India became since 1947. The later part is somehow less talked about and all the blames and ills of current India are pushed under the rug of historical perspectives.
How can any country grow, unless it addresses the current ills and weaknesses rather than merely blaming history and live in the past glory.
In my personal opinion, if India takes more pride in the India which is now rather than what India was, it will be able to walk in the next century with head held high.
Basically Indians have a deep inferiority complex - They think they are all super and mighty now and therefore they must show aggression now (This is vindicated by the posts of Indians Members on this forum!! as well as the popularity of Hindu radical parties such as RSS and BJP)
jab tak indian subcontinent main ek bhi gareeb rahega tab tak maoism Gareebon ki aas rahega.
(Till when there is even one poor/exploited on this subcontinent till then maoism will always remain the ray of hope for them.)
PS:Maoists are also for himsa.they dont believe in nonsense of ahimsa.Power flows from the barrel of gun as mao once said.....
Basically Indians have a deep inferiority complex - The Hindus in particular feel that they were made slaves by the Mughals (Muslims) so therefore they must take revenge now by attacking Pakistan.They think they are all super and mighty now and therefore they must show aggression now (This is vindicated by the posts of Indians Members on this forum!! as well as the popularity of Hindu radical parties such as RSS and BJP) but Indians should be careful what they wish for.Nazi Germany was also mighty and powerful (Obviously India does not have the kind of power that Nazi Germany possessed but just giving a comparison.) but you know what happened to Third Reich once it started the unjust WW2 by massacring people in Poland and other countries..
No. This was the only line with a vague reference to IVC
NO where does the author imply that India is the sole inheritor of that legacy. He just says where the name "India" came from. Please dont be so insecure.
>>>>>The word "India" is derived from the culture developed on the banks of the Sindhu (or Indus) river (It is IVC culture) at the beginning of known time. India became and remained one of the most powerful and richest countries in the world. This was over a period of about 3,000 years from about 2,000 BCE to about 1,000 CE. This era is broadly divided into 3 main periods - the Vedic Age, the Imperial Unity Age that encompasses the first example below and the Classic Age, the Golden Age of India, that encompasses the second example below. <<<<<
I don't blame you if you don't know my history. The history the author talks about is Pakistan's history and only a little part of this history relates to current India.
I really hope more Pakistanis believe what you claim.At least that way sites could be preserved from complete ruin.
Many of the Indus valley sites in Pakistan are facing Ruin like this one.
Floods Threaten 5,000-Year-old Site in Pakistan | Suite101
>>>>>The word "India" is derived from the culture developed on the banks of the Sindhu (or Indus) river (It is IVC culture) at the beginning of known time. India became and remained one of the most powerful and richest countries in the world. This was over a period of about 3,000 years from about 2,000 BCE to about 1,000 CE. This era is broadly divided into 3 main periods - the Vedic Age, the Imperial Unity Age that encompasses the first example below and the Classic Age, the Golden Age of India, that encompasses the second example below. <<<<<
I don't blame you if you don't know my history. The history the author talks about is Pakistan's history and only a little part of this history relates to current India.
>>>>>The word "Pakistan" is derived from the culture developed on the banks of the Sindhu (or Indus) river (It is IVC culture) at the beginning of known time. Pakistan became and remained one of the most powerful and richest countries in the world. This was over a period of about 3,000 years from about 2,000 BCE to about 1,000 CE. This era is broadly divided into 3 main periods - the Vedic Age, the Imperial Unity Age that encompasses the first example below and the Classic Age, the Golden Age of Pakistan, that encompasses the second example below. <<<<<
I don't blame you if you don't know my history. The history the author talks about is Pakistan's history and only a little part of this history relates to current India.
if you guys always post stuff about nuking india supporting separatism and terrorism in india why would you expect kind words from our side
ohh there he goes again playing the scion of of Indus valley civilisation.Back in the day,those guys in IVC surely did not know what does "subject" mean.The scion here doesnt know what does the title of the thread say either.
Is that what you mean?? that sounds not only weird but absurd as well.
You need training in English. Honestly. Your reading and the interpreted meaning is wrong. Go read it again.