What's new

Why do Pakistanis love Kashmir?

that reason was kargil... you people got another blow...

Kargil happened in 1999, Parliament attack happened in 2001. This was all agreed after that. And it was agreed back channel with India. With deals like these things are always sorted well ahead of the actual signing ceremony. The signing ceremony is just a formal photo shoot. The details have already been worked out. It's not like Pakistan was to go to India and say sign this. India and Pakistan had both agreed to it, you can ask or check your foreign ministry sources. However just before it could be signed, India backed away for reasons best known to them. The point being, there is no way India will get Kashmir from Pakistan, and vice versa without a nuke war. Simple. Indian PM and Musharraf both realized this. So just make LOC the border.
 
.
In short it is less about winning Kashmir and more about defeating Indians. Chinese occupied Kashmir to leke dekhe yen, they can't and wont even think of.
 
.
Strange logic of yours.Why the hell would we want delhi or mysore??????


Actually I can see such a possibility from your side .And my doubts was confirmed when the staffs in here talks like that.One of them told us several.times that they are looking for demographic change of entire India where Muslims having more than 50% population.Ok we can.ignore that as a silly comments from PDF.But your actions in other parts proved otherwise.We simply dont trust you guys .
You guys dont have anything with a Southie named as Tipu Sultan .yet I have seen the your members in here taking prpud about him.And If I am right you have a ship.in the name of Tipu.And we also heard about Hafiz Rant about raising Pak flag in Red Fort etc.
 
.
Other than the facts that you've corrected, you did not say anything about the main topic, which is why do Pakistanis love kashmir?
It's a variety of political, social, religious and cultural factors that combine to make Pakistanis 'love' Kashmir the way they do.

The comment from the original article I quoted sheds some light on the cultural and social perspective and the reality on the ground - ultimately I'm not an expert so I won't make any definitive conclusions except that the author's conclusion here is too superficial to be correct (i.e it is wrong).
 
.
Kargil happened in 1999, Parliament attack happened in 2001. This was all agreed after that. And it was agreed back channel with India. With deals like these things are always sorted well ahead of the actual signing ceremony. The signing ceremony is just a formal photo shoot. The details have already been worked out. It's not like Pakistan was to go to India and say sign this. India and Pakistan had both agreed to it, you can ask or check your foreign ministry sources. However just before it could be signed, India backed away for reasons best known to them. The point being, there is no way India will get Kashmir from Pakistan, and vice versa without a nuke war. Simple. Indian PM and Musharraf both realized this. So just make LOC the border.
Do you have any credible source that India was the one, which backed out?
 
. . . .
First of all kindly behave. Even if you don't like my claim, you should still behave.

Have you ever been to cantt area and a normal area of my beloved country. Do you have any idea about the perks and benefits uniformed govt "servants" get as compared to equivalent scale govt "teachers"? Do you have any idea about the number of plots and houses given rather bestowed cheaply to our staff car walay officers? do you remember the nlc(or perhaps maybe nha) scandal of generals involved in billions of loot and how they were saved by army chief? what is a bachelor pass non master non phd army general doing as rector nust? i can go on and on and cite you the corruption examples from martial law eras... but before that i hope you may learn your manners... and discuss these things in a civilized manner.
1;Firstly i know pakistan more than u considering the fact that u r sitting in SA.Secondly,i have visited cantt. and i know what u r trying to say.
2:Army provides relief to soldiers and officers using its own funds by investing money in housing schemes.Thats why 22the uniformed govt emplyes`` get those benefits for serving their country
3:Those were just scandals,nothing concrete to prove.Also u mentioned Pakistan army looting and plundering in Pakistan in comparison with indian army`s plundering in IOK.....Would u care to clarify????
4:I have no idea about NUST`s rector being from the army???May be @Pakistani shaheens can explain.Also its irrelevant as its not considered as ``looting and plundering``.
 
. .
Kashmiris are our blood, our kin, our family. We will fully back their central asian resistence model.
okay, keep backing. another failure awaits you people way...
 
.
The same logic can be applied to india too considering ur current govt.But still this is a strange logic......:o:

Lol :lol:
Still dont get it .Dont you ?.If we were a bully like you the BD would have been our other state after 71 liberation.But didnt happen why.Responsible nations wont bully others.They will react only when their national security is being questioned by others.We dont get any thing from you except headache if try for others territory
 
.
Kash -persky - mir

nick-fury-i-see-what-you-did-there[1].jpg
 
.
A bunch of weird points which make no sense.... This article has no facts and superficial points.
If America can be a hegemon and Israel can defy international law, so can Pakistan’ hypothesis.REJECTED: This certainly explains Pakistan’s constant revisionism, but it doesn’t explain why exactly Pakistanis love Kashmir in particular.
someone needs a lesson in Law
we know most Pakistanis are pretty shallow
One should be careful what we post. A few thousand such articles can be posted saying that about any national...
despite a lack of a shared history and language
many divided families still live on both sides which was too hard to research
@levina check the facts before posting articles and post meaningful articles
 
.
the author's conclusion here is too superficial to be correct (i.e it is wrong).
Superficial!
right!
But had she been brusque then would it not 've invited a lot of criticism from the authorities?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom