Why do Indians consider Pakistan one of their own vs Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh?

[Haris Ali2140]

Indians consider present day Pakistan as a separate political entity. Except for some politicians looking to score brownie points to prove their patriotic cred, no one is interested undoing the Partition.

Indic civilization includes present day Pak, Bangladesh, Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal, Burma, Cambodia, even parts of Indonesia and Thailand. India just happens to be so large that people tend to forget that.

There was a video in which Indians were asked about their views on Pakistan. Surprisingly many of them said that Pakistan should be a part of India and they were Uni. students.

 

[SIPRA]

There was a video in which Indians were asked about their views on Pakistan. Surprisingly many of them said that Pakistan should be a part of India.

Most of them cannot get rid of this ridiculous idea; since it is deeply rooted in their collective psyche.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

There was a video in which Indians were asked about their views on Pakistan. Surprisingly many of them said that Pakistan should be a part of India and they were Uni. students.

Can you post the video here ?

 

[Haris Ali2140]

Can you post the video here ?

You cab find it on youtube it was titled as "what indians think about pakistan".
I will also look fir it on PDF.

 

[jamahir]

Why do they think Pakistan is more Bharati than Nepal, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka?

Maybe you should ask Dilip Kumar ( Yusuf Khan ) who left his native Peshawar to come work in Bombay films. He surely found Bombay as comforting as Peshawar.

 

[SkyWolf]

Indians consider present day Pakistan as a separate political entity. Except for some politicians looking to score brownie points to prove their patriotic cred, no one is interested undoing the Partition.

Indic civilization includes present day Pak, Bangladesh, Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal, Burma, Cambodia, even parts of Indonesia and Thailand. India just happens to be so large that people tend to forget that.

Bullshit. Indus valley civ is indus valley civ. It has nothing to do with bharat nepal or burma. Stop appropriating our history and heritage.

 

[Flash_Ninja]

Same reason why their biggest Bollywood stars are all either Punjabis, Pathans, or Sindhis.

Same reason why they religiously follow all the affairs of Pakistan and Pakistani content to the point where even a school fight in some small town will have them commenting on it.

Same reason why after their disgusting actions in Kashmir they are frothing at the mouth for their desire to lie with Muslim Kashmiri women.

Pure jealousy.

 

[B.K.N]

Maybe you should ask Dilip Kumar ( Yusuf Khan ) who left his native Peshawar to come work in Bombay films. He surely found Bombay as comforting as Peshawar.

Where are you from Mumbai Indian punjab UP or some other area

 

[jamahir]

Where are you from Mumbai Indian punjab UP or some other area

From the Deccan.

 

[KhanBaba2]

"Hing" means shit, "laj" means nonstop, and mata means mother...so basically it is the "mother of unstoppable shit".. which they refer to India or Gangudesh in their books.

Careful. That is blasphemy. You know the punishment for it in Pakistan.

 

[SIPRA]

From the Deccan.

You mean Andhra Pradesh or Telangana?

 

[Crusher]

because historically the word "Hindustan" meant Sind and Punjab plus few adjoining states next to these two provinces to a lesser extent. Them idiots took the name India without Indus LOL

I extremely doubt it, Punjab and Sind were never known as "Hindustan". Hindustan was the area around Delhi and UP only. Different parts of Punjab in earlier times had different "indigenous names" such as the central Punjab was called "Madra". Sindh was always called Sindh, even parts of southern Punjab, eastern balochistan and southern KPK were also at times considered "greater Sindh". Kashmir was always called "Kashmir" or "Kasperia" etc. in the past, northern parts of KPK areas along with some adjoining areas in eastern Afghanistan were called "Gandhara" for most part of their history.

There was no such term as "Hindustan" in use in the ancient past, because the term "Hindustan" originated rather recently only during Turkic and Mughals times for areas around Delhi/UP where their centre of power lied. The word "Punjab" was also coined by the same Mughals to "differentiate" the areas lying west of "Hindustan" that is Delhi/UP areas. I read somewhere that one of the Sikh gurus had referred to himself as "Madri" in reference to the ancient name of central Punjab that is "Madra", the the name "Madra" was in use as late as few centuries ago in some circles of central Punjab. I wouldn't be surprised if the modern word "Majha" for the central Punjab that is still used in indian Punjab is a corrupted form of the ancient name of this region "Madra" and the language spoken in this area which they call in indian punjab as "Majhi" being originally "Madri" language or the modern standard punjabi of central Punjab.

See Madra located in the modern central punjab of Pakistan in the ancient times in this map

 

[jamahir]

You mean Andhra Pradesh or Telangana?

I prefer not revealing more on this open forum.

 

[B.K.N]

From the Deccan.

What language you speak?
mother tongue

 

[SIPRA]

I prefer not revealing more on this open forum.

It is OK. But my question was broad in nature. I intend to know, what at present Deccan implies?