What's new

Why dis Pakistani tec never failed?

Status
Not open for further replies.
loll what a crap thread. has pakistan ever built a single indegeneous radar, nuclear submarine, artillary gun, aircraft carrier, fighter plane, space rockets, satellites, engines etc etc.. nothing ever. pakistans first missiles were a copy of chinese missiles, jf17 is a gift from china to pakistan. can anyone tell me if pakistan has a known car company. :rofl: country that couldnt build a car cant build a rocket. sorry.

lolll 65 years after independence and pakistan could build missiles and couldnt convert those missiles into a slv. :rofl:. it shows how indegenous those were. india converted its missile tech immediately into space vehicle. why couldnt pak???

al khalid??? what is it have to do with pak. arjun is something u call indegeneous. soon it will be replaced by indian engine.

india might suffer failures in building its products, but atleast we build. :coffee:


does pakistan have any answer to indian anti ballestic missile system or up coming 5 nuke subs and slbm or to this beauty which will gaurd the valleys of kashmir reight above pakistani soldiers.
LCH%2BLight%2BCombat%2BHelicoptor%2B-%2BLCH%2BIndia.jpg
 
.
I am not sure about India, but in Pakistan we test each component, subcomponent, assembly and then put them together only when every component performs as per design parameters. It does not mean that final product is 100% ok the first time, but at least it does not fall from the sky. In this age, specially in case of missiles 98% is electronics and 2% physical systems. Success or failure depends on electronics performance, that can be tested in labs / on ground. Physical atrtributes can be modified / tweaked to enhance aerodynamic performance after real test, that is why we see minor design changes in Pakistani missiles. I hope this would help.

If your success rate is 100% then there is only two possibilities....either you are GOD or something fishy going on....
 
.
I am not sure about India, but in Pakistan we test each component, subcomponent, assembly and then put them together only when every component performs as per design parameters. It does not mean that final product is 100% ok the first time, but at least it does not fall from the sky. In this age, specially in case of missiles 98% is electronics and 2% physical systems. Success or failure depends on electronics performance, that can be tested in labs / on ground. Physical atrtributes can be modified / tweaked to enhance aerodynamic performance after real test, that is why we see minor design changes in Pakistani missiles. I hope this would help.

have u even seen the development of gslv mk3? i am 100% sure ur not an engineer or ur pakistani engineer which says all.

every country tests individual compenents before putting it together. the reason why pakistan doesnt fail is that pakistan gets made components from china which are already tested.
 
. .
@punjabimunda


Lol we have built everything except aircraft carrier, India still has to import from RUSSIA etc LOL

JF-17 is a JV not like Tejas which was given to Euro countries to make and painted in India :P

Al-khalid is indegenous, Argun doesn't have indegenous engine yet

What Indian anti ballistic system, your system is failed most of your test failed... btw we are making nuclear submarines you still have to import from russia

btw if you wanna know about car companies you can look and search, retard.
 
.
My age, education and IQ is not going to help either you your failed tests. Limited finanical resources do not leave any option of failure for Pakistan. It's about mindset, compare your LCA project with Thunder project. Compare Arjun project with AK project. Compare Prithivi/Agni/Tirshol/brahamos with Shaheen/Ghaznavi/Babur. Dollar for Dollar and day for day which country achieved better results.


Answer the question...counter questioning not allowed.
 
.
@punjabimunda


Lol we have built everything except aircraft carrier, India still has to import from RUSSIA etc LOL

JF-17 is a JV not like Tejas which was given to Euro countries to make and painted in India :P

Al-khalid is indegenous, Argun doesn't have indegenous engine yet

What Indian anti ballistic system, your system is failed most of your test failed... btw we are making nuclear submarines you still have to import from russia

btw if you wanna know about car companies you can look and search, retard.

ur knowledge on the topic prevents me from further discussion.:wave:
 
.
There's an old carpenter's maxim: measure twice, cut once!

Given the shoestring budget of Pakistan's military-industrial complex, it's cheaper to squeeze as much info as possible out of small component-level tests before trying out the full shebang.
 
.
@punjabimunda


LOL maybe you have nothing to say, chall bachay tum soojao you have to live in white country LOLZ
 
.
Pakistan can't even make a needle...forget about anything else...
 
.
Insa Allah.. Pakistan is really doing great in Military Technology. Their achievements are really appreciable...
I am pretty sure very soon Pakistan will start importing tech to CHINA as they have done in JF-17 program...
 
. .
My age, education and IQ is not going to help either you your failed tests. Limited finanical resources do not leave any option of failure for Pakistan. It's about mindset, compare your LCA project with Thunder project. Compare Arjun project with AK project. Compare Prithivi/Agni/Tirshol/brahamos with Shaheen/Ghaznavi/Babur. Dollar for Dollar and day for day which country achieved better results.

You are a bigger idiot than I earlier thought...my mistake.

Do you understand the dynamics of military projects?
Do you even know how many parts a missile/tank/plane has ?
Do you know how many companies have to come together to make ONE successful military product?

If the US with all its technological might and billions and billions of dollars at its disposal needs years and years to perfect technologies, your country should not even be counted.
 
.
My age, education and IQ is not going to help either you your failed tests. Limited finanicalresources do not leave any option of failure in tests. It's about mindset, compare your LCA project with Thunder project. Compare Arjun project with AK project. Compare Prithivi/Agni/Tirshol/brahamos with Shaheen/Ghaznavi/Babur. Dollar for Dollar and day for day which country achieved better results.

loll again immture and innocent pakistanis.

in the tejas program indian mastered 33 of 35 major 4.5 gen avionics. we built our own engine. agreed we had problems in it but we have know how now.

comparing pakistani and indian missiles is like comparing a phd with a 1st grader. indian missiles have ring gyro scope and are at par with the 21 century tech. on the other hand pakistani missiles lack the top guidence systems and dont have enough range and reentru tech or mirv. all these small things are crucial for long range missiles.

the abm ststem has been tested 6 times and be converted into sam of range 250 km...:coffee:

india converted its missile program into space program. now we are a space power. the now recket mk3 and 4 can take upto 15-18 tonnes in space. does pak have an ans??? if not the show some respect and stop ranting.
 
.
kids enough trolling for today i thing now please have a break this thread he open for fun :shout:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom