What's new

Why did Adolf Hitler dislike Indians? How Does Bhakt Love of Hitler Make Sense?

. .
[
Back then "India" was used as a geographical term like "Europe"

Nowerdays "India" is used to refer to "Republic of India"

Thats why I say I am a "Pakistani" from "South Asia"

South Asia is from Afghanistan to Bangladesh
Your identity is not independent. Logically, you need India no matter what because of your two nation theory.
 
.
What is perceived as love for hitler is actually admiration for having 'dealt with the enemy appropriately'. Right wing Hindus are very comfortable endorsing both Hitler's purge of Jews (read: Majority teaching the 'upstart' minorities a lesson) and Zionist Jews subjugating Palestinians (read: Muslims being a 'taught a lesson in their own neighbourhood').

For the right wing, Muslim is a bigger problem than the racism of a known monster, and nothing that cannot be swept under the carpet of History. In any case, I doubt even educated Indians have any knowledge of Hitler's poor view on Indians, let alone Bajrang dal members. In the same vein, the beef eating, circumcised, skull cap wearing Jew is acceptable as long as long as he is not eating Indian cows.
 
.
Considering the love of Hitler among fascist outfits like RSS and Shiv Sena among others, and them trying to model themselves after Hitler's Brown Shirts, is this not a joke itself??
That usually tends to happen when someone doesn't have something of his own to be proud of.
 
.
At least we do not suck up to the Russians.

On the contrary the Indian Establishment in the 1980s didn't like more USSR influence in South Asia ( other than in Afghanistan ) if the Zia ul Haq government were to fall to Pakistani leftists. So Indian Establishment saw Zia's Pakistan as buffer against USSR's expansion and would have supported Zia. From my thread from 2015, an article from The Asian Age :
Washington: Contradicting perceived proximity to the Soviet Union in the Cold War era, India under the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had toyed with the idea of supporting anti-Russian civilian groups in Pakistan if the then Zia regime was thrown out by Moscow, a recent declassified CIA document has claimed.

According to CIA documents of the era, which were recently declassified and posted on the CIA website under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which is similar to India's Right to Information Act, Gandhi wanted non-interference from both the United States and the then USSR. "Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi would like both the USSR and the United States to end their involvement in South Asia," noted the 31-page CIA document titled 'The Soviet Presence in Afghanistan: Implications for the Regional Powers and the US'.

While taking note of the historic India-USSR relationship in particular in the defence field, the CIA report of April 1985 noted that India is likely to become increasingly concerned about long-range Soviet intentions in the region and could find itself moving towards confrontation with the Soviets if Pakistan was effectively neutralised.

"New Delhi regards Pakistan as a strategic buffer against the USSR and would oppose Moscow's effort to dominate Pakistan. New Delhi and Moscow would find themselves supporting rival factions within Pakistan," said the report, according to which Moscow had plans to change the regime in Pakistan and extend its influence beyond Afghanistan. In that case, the report said, "The Indians would seek to significantly reduce their dependence on Moscow and reorder their strategic relationship with the USSR, the United States and China if they perceived Soviet ambitions as extending beyond Afghanistan toward the subcontinent."

According to the report, the Soviets tried to heighten India's suspicion about Pakistan's intentions and its security relationship with the US in order to foster Indo-Pakistani tensions and heighten New Delhi’s dependence on Moscow. "In Soviet view, conflict between India and Pakistan would work toward solving Moscow's Afghan problem and would give Moscow opportunities to strengthen its position in South Asia," the report said.

"If (Gen) Zia (Ul Haq) regime were to fall, the Indians might try to prevent Soviet attempt to dominate Pakistan by supporting rival Pakistani political factions, Soviet military moves against an already neutralised Pakistan could even result in military confrontation with India," it added.

Six months later when Gandhi was planning to meet General Zia on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, the CIA analyzed that the then Indian Prime Minister, despite his strong public views on Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, was unlikely to push him hard on it. "Gandhi is unlikely to push Zia hard about the Pakistani nuclear program, although he probably will at least mention his continuing concern," noted the top secret CIA document dated October 21, 1985.

"For his part, Zia is also likely to propose ideas on ways to improve the bilateral relationship. He may suggest regular high-level diplomatic talks in addition to the formal Joint Commission sessions that focuses on trade, communications and cultural exchanges," the report said. "Zia may also solicit Gandhi's views on whether as the Pakistanis believe the Soviets are becoming serious about a negotiated settlement in Afghanistan," it said.
 
.
The Indians are not to be reasoned with because he has alot of grievances according to himself that goes as far back as 1000 years hence they have an ultra-high inferiority complex towards Pakistanis hence their hatred is great.

You can't reason with that person because his mind is already made up long time ago and you are wasting your time. Don't reason at all but instead work on keeping him locked inside his inferiority complex.

We build their cities and everything they own and hack even they themselves belong to us as property.. don't get side tracked from this simple fact. They are inferior beings who are fuelled by inferiority complex..

They aren't our equals on the land and if they wanna be our equals they should first lose the inferiority complex and act normally first of all removing the mental block but I doubt they can ever achieve that
 
Last edited:
.
It's Jinnahs basic message, the hindus have a thousand year chip on their shoulders, all that defeat left a mental mark on the Hindu and they can't be trusted, it's why partition was the only way then the cluster fcuk of hate that is a united India
 
.
It's Jinnahs basic message, the hindus have a thousand year chip on their shoulders, all that defeat left a mental mark on the Hindu and they can't be trusted, it's why partition was the only way then the cluster fcuk of hate that is a united India

It is an inferiority cesspool with a long term chip on thier shoulders as you said. They aren't the type of people who know bygones are bygones due to caste system being ingrained into their life styles hence the chip will over shoulder everything and last
 
.
It is an inferiority cesspool with a long term chip on thier shoulders as you said. They aren't the type of people who know bygones are bygones due to caste system being ingrained into their life styles hence the chip will over shoulder everything and last

Jinnah tried to explain this to Indian Muslims, he was adamant, DONT PUT YOURSELVES IN A POSITION THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE A SAY IN YOUR FUTURE

Indian Muslims were crazy to trust in a india
 
.
Indians are typically very slavish mindset to Muslims & West, Pakistanis even when they start dominating Indians accept it. Pakistanis has a psychological affect on their brains despite India is 7 times bigger than Pakistan.

Every Tom Dick Harry Indian is trying to prove itself better than a Pakistani. Indians hanger to put down Pakistan at every little aspect of life is a bigger sign of inferior complex and trying to pull leg down. Indians live a slave life in 100+ countries they live. So many aspects define Indian inferiority complex and narrow mindedness.
 
.
Jinnah tried to explain this to Indian Muslims, he was adamant, DONT PUT YOURSELVES IN A POSITION THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE A SAY IN YOUR FUTURE

It should have never been founded as state but in separate states because it is technically not even a country but a sub-continent as you have over 50-100 ethnicties.. It's creation itself is an error that must be undone
 
.
Jinnah tried to explain this to Indian Muslims, he was adamant, DONT PUT YOURSELVES IN A POSITION THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE A SAY IN YOUR FUTURE

Indian Muslims were crazy to trust in a india

They didn't have a choice, those who could migrate did but many just couldn't, very few minority supported united India their progeny ofcourse will pay the price for it.
 
.
Indians are typically very slavish mindset to Muslims & West, Pakistanis even when they start dominating Indians accept it. Pakistanis has a psychological affect on their brains despite India is 7 times bigger than Pakistan.

Every Tom Dick Harry Indian is trying to prove itself better than a Pakistani. Indians hanger to put down Pakistan at every little aspect of life is a bigger sign of inferior complex and trying to pull leg down. Indians live a slave life in 100+ countries they live. So many aspects define Indian inferiority complex and narrow mindedness.

Yes I have noticed this in the west. They are extremely inferior also there and you would noticed an Indian straight away here in the US. they always need someone to guide them thru life. Indian without a master is nobody and their lives is build upon seeking a master. They are extremely different from all other ethnicties I have seen in the US.

They are like the minions cartoon in real life
 
.
India has fallen to a terrorist element with massive inferiority complex
 
.
Back
Top Bottom